Cited by 30Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

An Investigation of Levetiracetam in Alzheimer’s Disease (ILiAD): A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover proof of concept study

Open access
Sen, Arjune, Akinola, Mary, Tai, Xin You, Symmonds, Mkael, Davis Jones, Gabriel, Mura, Sergio, Galloway, Joanne, Hallam, Angela +11 more·2021·Trials

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although Alzheimer's disease affects around 800,000 people in the UK and costs almost £23 billion per year, currently licenced treatments only offer modest benefit at best. Seizures, which are more common in patients with Alzheimer's disease than age matched controls, may contribute to the loss of nerve cells and abnormal brain discharges can disrupt cognition. This aberrant electrical activity may therefore present potentially important drug targets. The anti-seizure medication levetiracetam can reduce abnormal cortical discharges and reverse memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Levetiracetam has also been shown to improve memory difficulties in patients with mild cognitive impairment, a precursor to Alzheimer's disease. Clinical use of levetiracetam is well-established in treatment of epilepsy and extensive safety data are available. Levetiracetam thus has the potential to provide safe and efficacious treatment to help with memory difficulties in Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: The proposed project is a proof of concept study to test whether levetiracetam can help cognitive function in people with dementia. We plan to recruit thirty patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease with no history of previous seizures or other significant co-morbidity. Participants will be allocated to a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial that tests levetiracetam against placebo. Standardised scales to assess cognition and a computer-based touchscreen test that we have developed to better detect subtle improvements in hippocampal function will be used to measure changes in memory. All participants will have an electroencephalogram (EEG) at baseline. The primary outcome measure is a change in the computer-based touchscreen cognitive task while secondary outcomes include the effect of levetiracetam on mood, quality of life and modelling of the EEG, including time series measures and feature-based analysis to see whether the effect of levetiracetam can be predicted. The effect of levetiracetam and placebo will be compared within a given patient using the paired t-test and the analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline values. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to evaluate if an anti-seizure medication can offer meaningful benefit to patients with Alzheimer's disease. If this study demonstrates at least stabilisation of memory function and/or good tolerability, the next step will be to rapidly progress to a larger study to establish whether levetiracetam may be a useful and cost-effective treatment for patients with Alzheimer's disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03489044 . Registered on April 5, 2018.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-021-05404-4

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In early stages of AD, AGB101 is supposed to reduce neuronal hyperactivity Aβ-induced, fighting memory impairment and slowing disease progression.

    “In the early stages of AD, the drug is supposed to reduce neuronal hyperactivity Aβ-induced fighting the memory impairment and slowing the disease progression [110].”

    From Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Beyond Symptomatic Therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Introduction’s Background and rationale proposes that levetiracetam may improve cognition in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease by addressing disrupted neuronal activity; it also reports reduced amyloid plaques and memory deficits in mouse models. It does not identify the drug as AGB101, establish that the hyperactivity is Aβ-induced, or propose that treatment slows disease progression. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AGB101 acts by modulating the synaptic protein SV2A.

    “AGB101, assessed in a phase III clinical trial (NCT03486938) in MCI patients, acts by modulating the synaptic protein SV2A.”

    From Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Beyond Symptomatic Therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Introduction and Discussion state that levetiracetam binds synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A). Our copy does not identify AGB101 or establish that it is levetiracetam, so it does not verify the mechanism attributed to AGB101 (searched: AGB101 and the trial identifier). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sen, A., Akinola, M., Tai, X. Y., Symmonds, M., Davis Jones, G., Mura, S., Galloway, J., Hallam, A., Chan, J. Y. C., Koychev, I., Butler, C., Geddes, J., Van Der Putt, R., Thompson, S., Manohar, S. G., Frangou, E., Love, S., McShane, R., & Husain, M.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • UCB Pharma (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Sen, Arjune
Venue
Trials
Published
2021-07-31
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
508-508
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173559733
Cited by
30
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Medical Research Foundation (Confidence in Concept - letter attached)
  • UCB Pharma (Investigator initiated study - letter attached)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
levetiracetam, Alzheimer's disease, antiepileptic drugs, memory impairment, cognitive function, EEG, hippocampal function, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, seizure activity, drug repurposing, crossover trial, randomised placebo-controlled trial
MeSH terms
Proof of Concept Study, Levetiracetam, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Quality of Life, Cross-Over Studies, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review