Cited by 34Algal biology and biofuel productionFluid Dynamics and MixingGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control

Single-cell computational analysis of light harvesting in a flat-panel photo-bioreactor

Open access
Loomba, Varun, Huber, Gregor, von Lieres, Eric·2018·Biotechnology for Biofuels

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flat-panel photo-bioreactors (PBRs) are customarily applied for investigating growth of microalgae. Optimal design and operation of such reactors is still a challenge due to complex non-linear combinations of various impact factors, particularly hydrodynamics, light irradiation, and cell metabolism. A detailed analysis of single-cell light reception can lead to novel insights into the complex interactions of light exposure and algae movement in the reactor. RESULTS: The combined impacts of hydrodynamics and light irradiation on algae cultivation in a flat-panel PBR were studied by tracing the light exposure of individual cells over time. Hydrodynamics and turbulent mixing in this air-sparged bioreactor were simulated using the Eulerian approach for the liquid phase and a slip model for the gas phase velocity profiles. The liquid velocity was then used for tracing single cells and their light exposure, using light intensity profiles obtained from solving the radiative transfer equation at different wavelengths. The residence times of algae cells in defined dark and light zones of the PBR were statistically analyzed for different algal concentrations and sparging rates. The results indicate poor mixing caused by the reactor design which can be only partially improved by increased sparging rates. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide important information for optimizing algal biomass productivity by improving bioreactor design and operation and can further be utilized for an in-depth analysis of algal growth by using advanced models of cell metabolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13068-018-1147-3

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of gas-liquid flows in photobioreactor CFD models are modeled in the Eulerian-Eulerian formulation, as two interpenetrating continua.

    “According to Table 1, the majority of gas-liquid flows is modeled in the EulerianEulerian formulation [18,25-27,29-31,39-42,45,125,135,136], thus, as two interpenetrating continua.”

    From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Methods (Hydrodynamics) explicitly say this model uses an Eulerian approach for the liquid but a Lagrangian slip-model approach for gas velocity. It therefore does not exemplify the Eulerian–Eulerian formulation for which the citing sentence includes it; this paper alone also cannot establish what the majority of models use. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most commonly used drag models for gas-liquid flows in photobioreactor models are the Schiller-Naumann, Grace, Ishii-Zuber and Tomiyama models.

    “According to Table 2, the most commonly used drag models for gas-liquid flows are the Schiller-Naumann [17,25,27,29], Grace [45,135], Ishii-Zuber [18,19,26,136] and Tomiyama models [30,31,125]”

    From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    Methods > Particle tracing explicitly says the study used the Schiller–Naumann drag law to estimate algal-particle velocity response. Methods > Hydrodynamics also models drag between gas bubbles and liquid, but does not identify that gas–liquid drag model as Schiller–Naumann. The paper therefore supports the citation as an example of Schiller–Naumann use in a photobioreactor, not specifically its use for gas–liquid flow or the claim that it is among the most commonly used models. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some researchers selected solving the full RTE numerically in one or more dimensions.

    “Instead of using simplified or analytical models, some researchers selected the second approach, which is solving the full RTE numerically in one or more dimensions [18,21,26-28,34].”
  • Microalgae cells are mostly modeled as discrete objects in photobioreactor CFD models.

    “In contrast, microalgae cells are mostly modeled as discrete objects [23,24,26-29,31,34,36-38,136].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loomba, V., Huber, G., & von Lieres, E.
Affiliations
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Corresponding author
Huber, Gregor
Venue
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Published
2018-05-26
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
149-149
ISSN
1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807635598
Cited by
34
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
German Ministry of Education and Research (03SF0465)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, light harvesting, hydrodynamics, turbulent mixing, air sparging, residence time, radiative transfer equation, Eulerian two-phase flow, bioreactor design optimization, algal biomass productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review