Cited by 1,238Fluid Dynamics and MixingMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns

Prince, Michael J., Blanch, Harvey W.·1990·AIChE Journal

Abstract

Abstract A Phenomenological model is proposed for the rates of bubble coalescence and bubble break‐up in turbulent gas‐liquid dispersions. Bubble coalescence is modeled by considering bubble collisions due to turbulence, buoyancy, and laminar shear, and by analysis of the coalescence efficiency of collisions. Bubble break‐up is analyzed in terms of bubble interactions with turbulent eddies. A method for the measurement of coalescence and break‐up events in turbulent systems is described and used to test the validity of the proposed model. The measurement technique relies on the mixing of tracer gases within bubbles upon coalescence, in conjunction with Monte‐Carlo simulations of coalescence events. Both distilled water and salt solutions are examined. Favorable agreement is found between the model and the individual coalescence and breakage rates, as well as with data obtained for the average bubble size and bubble size distribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aic.690361004

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tsouris and Tavlarides [275] assume the same form as the model of Prince and Blanch [273], with eddy-drop collision frequency based on assumptions that isotropic turbulence holds, the drop size is in the inertial sub-range, and only eddies whose size is equal to or smaller than the drop size can cause breakage.

    “The model of Tsouris and Tavlarides [275] assumes the same form as the one of Prince and Blanch [273]. The eddy-drop collision frequency is based on the assumptions that the isotropic turbulence holds, the drop size is in the inertial sub-range, and only eddies whose size is equal to or smaller than the drop size can cause the breakage of the drops.”
  • Prince and Blanch [273] report that the model of Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244] delivers break-up rates that are several orders of magnitude smaller than their experimental results, and claim that Coulaloglou and Tavlarides did not take the density of the liquid phase into account.

    “However, they report that the model of Coulaloglou and Tavlarides [244] delivers break-up rates that are several orders of magnitude smaller than their experimental results [273]. Prince and Blanch claim that Coulaloglou and Tavlarides did not take the density of the liquid phase into account.”
  • Prince and Blanch [273] assume that bubble breakage occurs due to the interaction between turbulent eddies and bubbles, and that eddies whose size is equal to or slightly smaller than bubble size can cause the breakage of bubbles, while larger eddies are only responsible for the transport of bubbles and very small eddies do not have enough energy to break bubbles.

    “Their idea is that bubble breakage occurs due to the interaction between turbulent eddies and bubbles, and they also assume that eddies whose size is equal to or slightly smaller than bubble size can cause the breakage of bubbles. Larger eddies are only responsible for the transport of bubbles and very small eddies do not have enough energy to break bubbles.”
  • Prince and Blanch [273] assume that coalescence of two bubbles in turbulent flows occurs in three steps: bubbles collide retaining liquid, liquid drains until critical thickness, and coalescence occurs when the film breaks.

    “Prince and Blanch [273] assume that the coalescence of two bubbles in turbulent flows occurs in three steps. First, bubbles collide thereby retaining a small amount of liquid between them. Second, this liquid drains until the thickness of the liquid film that separates the two bubbles reaches a critical value. Finally, bubble coalescence occurs when the liquid film is so thin that it breaks.”
  • Prince and Blanch [273] hypothesize that turbulence is isotropic and bubble size lies in the inertial subrange.

    “Besides, it is also hypothesized that turbulence is isotropic and bubble size lies in the inertial subrange [273].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prince, M. J., & Blanch, H. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
AIChE Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-10
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
1485-1499
ISSN
  • 0001-1541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-5905
OpenAlex
W2068995669
Cited by
1,238
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 42
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIChE Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Keywords
bubble coalescence, bubble breakup, coalescence efficiency, bubble collisions, buoyancy, laminar shear, turbulent eddies, Monte Carlo simulation, bubble size distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review