Cited by 37Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Impact of heat treatment on Dirofilaria immitis antigen detection in shelter dogs

Open access
DiGangi, Brian A., Dworkin, Carly, Stull, Jason W., O’Quin, Jeanette, Elser, Morgan, Marsh, Antoinette E., Groshong, Lesli, Wolfson, Wendy +5 more·2017·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of canine heartworm disease is a growing concern for shelter veterinarians. Although the accuracy of commercial antigen test kits has been widely studied, recent reports have renewed interest in antigen blocking as a causative factor for false "no antigen detected" results. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of false "no antigen detected" results in adult dogs entering shelters in northern, southern, and western regions of the country and to identify historical and clinical risk factors for such results. METHODS: Serum samples were evaluated for Dirofilaria immitis antigen using a commercially available point-of-care ELISA; samples in which no antigen was detected underwent a heat treatment protocol and repeat antigen testing. Whole blood samples underwent Knott testing to identify the presence of microfilariae. Historical and clinical findings were analyzed using exact logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 616 samples were analyzed. Overall prevalence of positive antigen test results (prior to heat treatment) was 7.3% and frequency of false "no antigen detected" results due to antigen blocking (ie, samples with no antigen detected prior to heat treatment and positive after heat treatment) was 5.2%. Among dogs that had no detectable antigen on the initial tests, dogs that had microfilariae detected via modified Knott testing (OR = 32.30, p-value = 0.013) and dogs that previously received a heartworm preventive (OR = 3.81, p-value = 0.016) had greater odds of antigen blocking than dogs without these factors. Among dogs that were heartworm positive, those without microfilariae detected had greater odds of antigen blocking than dogs with this factor (OR = 11.84, p-value = 0.0005). Geographic region of origin was significantly associated with occurrence of antigen blocking (p = 0.0036); however, blocking occurred in all regions sizably contributing to heartworm diagnoses. Of the 74 dogs found to be infected with heartworms in this study, 39.2% (29) had no detectable antigen prior to heat treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Heat treatment of serum samples should be considered to improve diagnostic test accuracy, particularly in dogs that reportedly received a heartworm preventive prior to antigen testing regardless of region of origin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13071-017-2443-7

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of heat-treated serum for in-house antigen tests can provide a solution to the antigen-masking problem.

    “The use of heat-treated serum for in-house antigen tests can provide a solution to this problem and therefore has been practised in the context of this study since 2015 (Velasquez et al. 2014; DiGangi et al. 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]DiGangi B. Practical management of canine heartworm disease in animal shelters. In: Proceedings, 19th Annual ABVP Symposium, Nashville, TN. 2014.
  2. [3]Isaza N. Treating heartworm in shelter dogs: 500+ cases (and counting!). Maddie’s Shelter Medicine Conference. 2014:2014. http://www.maddiesfund.org/Maddies_Institute/Videos/Treating_Heartworm_Disease.html. Accessed 19 Oct 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiGangi, B. A., Dworkin, C., Stull, J. W., O’Quin, J., Elser, M., Marsh, A. E., Groshong, L., Wolfson, W., Duhon, B., Broaddus, K., Gingrich, E. N., Swiniarski, E., & Berliner, E. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Tree House Humane Society (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
DiGangi, Brian A.
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2017-11
Volume
10
Issue
S2
Pages
483-483
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767482544
Cited by
33
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Florida Digital Collections (University of Florida) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IslandScholar (University of Prince Edward Island) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Zoetis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine heartworm disease, Dirofilaria immitis, false-negative results, shelter dogs, microfilariae, diagnostic accuracy, regional variation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Helminth, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Hot Temperature, Point-of-Care Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review