Cited by 286Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum

Open access
Little, Susan E, Raymond, Melissa R, Thomas, Jennifer E, Gruntmeir, Jeff, Hostetler, Joe A, Meinkoth, James H, Blagburn, Byron L·2014·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis infection in cats is complicated by the difficulty associated with reliable detection of antigen in feline blood and serum samples. METHODS: To determine if antigen-antibody complex formation may interfere with detection of antigen in feline samples, we evaluated the performance of four different commercially available heartworm tests using serum samples from six cats experimentally infected with D. immitis and confirmed to harbor a low number of adult worms (mean = 2.0). Sera collected 168 (n = 6), 196 (n = 6), and 224 (n = 6) days post infection were tested both directly and following heat treatment. RESULTS: Antigen was detected in serum samples from 0 or 1 of 6 infected cats using the assays according to manufacturer's directions, but after heat treatment of serum samples, as many as 5 of 6 cats had detectable antigen 6-8 months post infection. Antibodies to D. immitis were detected in all six infected cats by commercial in-clinic assay and at a reference laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that heat treatment of samples prior to testing can improve the sensitivity of antigen assays in feline patients, supporting more accurate diagnosis of this infection in cats. Surveys conducted by antigen testing without prior heat treatment of samples likely underestimate the true prevalence of infection in cats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-3305-7-1

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antigen test may be negative in some patients with an infection from a single female adult worm.

    “Furthermore, the test may be negative in some patients with an infection from a single female adult worm [21,22].”
  • Antigen-antibody complex formation can greatly interfere with the detection of D. immitis antigen.

    “The main hypotheses that justify these divergent results could be the antigen-antibody complex formation that can greatly interfere with the detection of the antigen (Brunner et al., 1988;Tonelli and Quentin, 1989;Little et al., 2014).”

    From Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal (2014) · cites this paper as Little et al., 2014

  • Heat pretreatment of feline and canine serum or plasma samples improves the sensitivity of these commercial antigen assays in cats (and dogs) carrying only a few adult female worms by releasing antigens blocked within circulating immune complexes.

    “heat pretreatment of feline and canine serum or plasma samples improves the sensitivity of these commercial antigen assays in cats (and dogs) carrying only a few adult female worms by releasing antigens blocked within circulating immune complexes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nelson CT Feline heartworm infection: diagnosis and management Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2008 30 393 400 18825639
  2. Tonelli QJ Quentin AB Factors affecting the accuracy of enzyme immunoassays for Dirofilaria immitis adult antigen Proceedings Am Heartworm Symp 1989 Washington, DC: American Heartworm Society 161 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Little, S. E., Raymond, M. R., Thomas, J. E., Gruntmeir, J., Hostetler, J. A., Meinkoth, J. H., & Blagburn, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Little, Susan E
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2014
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103047483
Cited by
286
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12
FWCI
21.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Oklahoma State University
  • National Center for Veterinary Parasitology
  • Bayer HealthCare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, feline heartworm disease, immune complexes, diagnostic sensitivity, antibody detection, cats, experimental infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Helminth, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Female, Hot Temperature, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review