Cited by 93Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Prime detection of Dirofilaria immitis: understanding the influence of blocked antigen on heartworm test performance

Open access
Little, Susan, Saleh, Meriam, Wohltjen, Megan, Nagamori, Yoko·2018·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

Detection of circulating antigen of Dirofilaria immitis has been a mainstay of identifying heartworm infection in clinical practice for the past three decades. Several validated commercial antigen tests have very good sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values, especially when used in patients for which heartworm infection is likely. In some dogs and cats infected with heartworm, antigen may not be available for detection although present in the patient sample; heat pretreatment of these samples reveals the antigen, changing the false negative to positive. This phenomenon was documented in the literature in the 1980s but subsequently overlooked by the heartworm research community for many years. In this review, we provide a summary of the current understanding of the role of heat reversal in diagnosing heartworm infection. This additional diagnostic step is most important for patients in which heartworm infection is likely, such as dogs or cats in an endemic area with an inconsistent history of heartworm preventive use, or dogs with a prior diagnosis of heartworm infection that were recently treated. To illustrate the concept, we share a summary of results from canine samples tested at the state veterinary diagnostic laboratory in Oklahoma, USA in 2017 by modified Knott test and by commercial antigen test before and after heat treatment of samples; in this sample set, heat treatment changed all D. immitis microfilaria-positive but antigen-negative samples to antigen-positive. Pet dogs with a history of consistent preventive use are unlikely to become positive with heat pretreatment; for that reason, routine pretreatment of all samples tested in a veterinary practice is not recommended. We also review known causes of false negative and false positive results on heartworm antigen tests that, although uncommon, can complicate accurate diagnosis in individual patients. Together, this review provides a primer to aid understanding of strategies that can enhance accurate diagnosis of heartworm infection in veterinary practice and clinical research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13071-018-2736-5

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with macrocyclic lactones can lead to the formation of antigen-antibody complexes in some patients, masking the antigen and resulting in false-negative test results.

    “As treatment with macrocyclic lactones can lead to the formation of antigen-antibody complexes in some patients, masking the antigen and resulting in false-negative test results, ELISA antigen-testing was repeated in negative samples, using heated serum [41,42].”
  • Heat pretreatment of feline and canine serum or plasma samples improves the sensitivity of these commercial antigen assays in cats (and dogs) carrying only a few adult female worms by releasing antigens blocked within circulating immune complexes.

    “heat pretreatment of feline and canine serum or plasma samples improves the sensitivity of these commercial antigen assays in cats (and dogs) carrying only a few adult female worms by releasing antigens blocked within circulating immune complexes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]McCall JW Suprakorndej BS Donoghue AR Turnbull RK Seward LE Knight DH Evaluation of the performance of canine heartworm antigen test kits licensed for use by veterinarians and canine heartworm antigen tests conducted by diagnostic laboratories Recent Advances in Heartworm Disease Symposium ’01 2001 Batavia, Illinois American Heartworm Society 135 140
  2. [3]American Heartworm Society. Recommended procedures for the diagnosis and management of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infection. In: Soll MD, editor. Proceedings of the Heartworm Symposium ’92. Austin: American Heartworm Society; 1992. p. 289–94.
  3. [7]Tonelli QJ, Quentin AB. Factors affecting the accuracy of enzyme immunoassays for Dirofilaria immitis adult antigen. In: Otto GF, editor. Proceedings of the Heartworm Symposium ’89. Washington, DC: American Heartworm Society; 1989. p. 161–5.
  4. [12]Courtney CH Soll MD Comparing the performance of heartworm antigen tests in dogs Recent Advances in Heartworm Disease Symposium ’01 2001 Batavia, Illinois American Heartworm Society 105 110
  5. [29]Lee ACY Rude KM Drake J Hostetler JA Bowman DD Detection of Dirofilaria immitis antigen 128 days post-infection in heat-treated canine serum Proceedings, 59th Annual AAVP Meeting 2015 Boston MA
  6. [38]Nafe L Little SE DeMars P Baumwart R Yamada N Johnson E Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis antigen in client-owned pet dogs before and after serum heat treatment Proceedings, Annual ACVIM Forum 2016 Denver CO. J Vet Intern Med 1428
  7. [63]Zoetis, Inc.: Technical bulletin WIT-00130. 2016. https://www.zoetisus.com/misc/files/pdfs/witness-heartworm-technical-bulletin.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2017.
  8. [64]McCall JW, Suprakorndej N, McCall SD, Mansour AE. Evaluation of feline heartworm antibody test kits and diagnostic laboratory tests. In: Soll MD, editor. Recent Advances in Heartworm Disease Symposium ’01. Batavia, Illinois: American Heartworm. Society. 2001:125–33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Little, S., Saleh, M., Wohltjen, M., & Nagamori, Y.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Little, Susan
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2018-03-20
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
186-186
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804718140
Cited by
93
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oklahoma State University
  • Bayer Animal Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, heartworm infection, thermal pretreatment, false-negative results, dogs, cats, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Helminth, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, False Negative Reactions, False Positive Reactions, Hot Temperature, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review