Cited by 588Computational Drug Discovery MethodsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Digital twins to personalize medicine

Open access
on behalf of the Swedish Digital Twin Consortium, Björnsson, Bergthor, Borrebaeck, Carl, Elander, Nils, Gasslander, Thomas, Gawel, Danuta R., Gustafsson, Mika, Jörnsten, Rebecka +12 more·2020·Genome Medicine

Abstract

Personalized medicine requires the integration and processing of vast amounts of data. Here, we propose a solution to this challenge that is based on constructing Digital Twins. These are high-resolution models of individual patients that are computationally treated with thousands of drugs to find the drug that is optimal for the patient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13073-019-0701-3

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthcare, digital twins are a promising tool for drug target discovery.

    “In healthcare, digital twins are a promising tool for drug target discovery 65,66 .”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

  • This will likely require large collaborations across health systems, research groups and industry.

    “This will likely require large collaborations across health systems, research groups and industry, such as the Swedish Digital Twins Consortium 65,72 .”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
on behalf of the Swedish Digital Twin Consortium, Björnsson, B., Borrebaeck, C., Elander, N., Gasslander, T., Gawel, D. R., Gustafsson, M., Jörnsten, R., Lee, E. J., Li, X., Lilja, S., Martínez-Enguita, D., Matussek, A., Sandström, P., Schäfer, S., Stenmarker, M., Sun, X. F., Sysoev, O., Zhang, H., & Benson, M.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Futurum - Akademin för Hälsa och Vård (SE)
Corresponding author
Benson, Mikael
Venue
Genome Medicine
Published
2019-12-31
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
4-4
ISSN
1756-994X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999365564
Cited by
566
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 143 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 12
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swedish Cancer Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
digital twin, personalized medicine, patient modeling, drug repurposing, computational drug screening, precision medicine, data integration
MeSH terms
Disease, Humans, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review