Cited by 72Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Pilot study of repeated blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease with an implantable ultrasound device

Open access
Epelbaum, Stéphane, Burgos, Ninon, Canney, Michael, Matthews, Dawn, Houot, Marion, Santin, Mathieu D., Desseaux, Carole, Bouchoux, Guillaume +11 more·2022·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) using pulsed ultrasound leads to the clearance of both amyloid and tau from the brain, increased neurogenesis, and mitigation of cognitive decline in pre-clinical models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) while also increasing BBB penetration of therapeutic antibodies. The goal of this pilot clinical trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of this approach in patients with mild AD using an implantable ultrasound device. Methods: An implantable, 1-MHz ultrasound device (SonoCloud-1) was implanted under local anesthesia in the skull (extradural) of 10 mild AD patients to target the left supra-marginal gyrus. Over 3.5 months, seven ultrasound sessions in combination with intravenous infusion of microbubbles were performed twice per month to temporarily disrupt the BBB. 18 F-florbetapir and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were performed on a combined PET/MRI scanner at inclusion and at 4 and 8 months after the initiation of sonications to monitor the brain metabolism and amyloid levels along with cognitive evaluations. The evolution of cognitive and neuroimaging features was compared to that of a matched sample of control participants taken from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Results: A total of 63 BBB opening procedures were performed in nine subjects. The procedure was well-tolerated. A non-significant decrease in amyloid accumulation at 4 months of − 6.6% (SD = 7.2%) on 18 F-florbetapir PET imaging in the sonicated gray matter targeted by the ultrasound transducer was observed compared to baseline in six subjects that completed treatments and who had evaluable imaging scans. No differences in the longitudinal change in the glucose metabolism were observed compared to the neighboring or contralateral regions or to the change observed in the same region in ADNI participants. No significant effect on cognition evolution was observed in comparison with the ADNI participants as expected due to the small sample size and duration of the trial. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the safety of ultrasound-based BBB disruption and the potential of this technology to be used as a therapy for AD patients. Research of this technique in a larger clinical trial with a device designed to sonicate larger volumes of tissue and in combination with disease-modifying drugs may further enhance the effects observed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03119961

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-022-00981-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epelbaum, S., Burgos, N., Canney, M., Matthews, D., Houot, M., Santin, M. D., Desseaux, C., Bouchoux, G., Stroer, S., Martin, C., Habert, M.-O., Levy, M., Bah, A., Martin, K., Delatour, B., Riche, M., Dubois, B., Belin, L., & Carpentier, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Archer Daniels Midland (United States) (US)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Carpentier, Alexandre
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2022-03-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
40-40
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220890844
Cited by
72
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 5
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Banque Publique d'investissement
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, blood-brain barrier disruption, microbubbles, amyloid clearance, 18F-florbetapir PET, glucose metabolism, cognitive decline, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Humans, Pilot Projects, Positron-Emission Tomography, Neuroimaging, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review