The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A primer on the use of mouse models for identifying direct sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues
Open accessAbstract
In animals with heteromorphic sex chromosomes, all sex differences originate from the sex chromosomes, which are the only factors that are consistently different in male and female zygotes. In mammals, the imbalance in Y gene expression, specifically the presence vs. absence of Sry , initiates the differentiation of testes in males, setting up lifelong sex differences in the level of gonadal hormones, which in turn cause many sex differences in the phenotype of non-gonadal tissues. The inherent imbalance in the expression of X and Y genes, or in the epigenetic impact of X and Y chromosomes, also has the potential to contribute directly to the sexual differentiation of non-gonadal cells. Here, we review the research strategies to identify the X and Y genes or chromosomal regions that cause direct, sexually differentiating effects on non-gonadal cells. Some mouse models are useful for separating the effects of sex chromosomes from those of gonadal hormones. Once direct “sex chromosome effects” are detected in these models, further studies are required to narrow down the list of candidate X and/or Y genes and then to identify the sexually differentiating genes themselves. Logical approaches to the search for these genes are reviewed here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


![Fig. 3 Sex chromosome structure diagrams related to Cross A (XY* model [70]). Sections of the sex chromosomes have been deleted to allow expansion of other regions for illustration. For the WT sex chromosomes, the PAR is illustrated in three sections†, one of which contains Sts. The minute + subregion of the NPX (<1% of the total NPX), adjacent to the PAR, is shown as a bracketed region within the entire NPX for the X and XXY* chromosomes, and in yellow for the Y* and Y*X chromosomes. The Y* chromosome has an X centromere and the plus (+) region of NPX adjacent to a unique duplicated PAR that nevertheless lacks Sts (ΔPAR). The X centromere (X CEN) is the functional centromere, whereas the Y centromere is inactive (Y CEN). The Y* chromosome undergoes abnormal recombination with the X chromosome to produce (1) the long XY* chromosome that is an end-to-end fusion of NPX and NPY with the ΔPAR lacking Sts and (2) the minute Y*X chromosome with a normal PAR and the plus (+) region of NPX. The gene map for the Y*X illustrates the approximate positions of genes transcribed from the forward strand (black rectangles) or reverse strand (lines), with the centromere (orange) and the plus (+) region of NPX (yellow) color coded. In effect, Y*X is an X chromosome with a massive NPX deletion running from a region thought to be just proximal to Msl3 and ending within the Sstx/Spin2 multi-copy cluster adjacent to the telomeric X centromere [22, 72, 118–120]. The dividing line between NPX+ and the rest of NPX is not known precisely but is on the centromeric side of Msl3 [72]. This figure updates and corrects earlier versions [50, 121]. † The PAR sections A–C were originally defined by mapping using the XY* model [71]: A, the terminal section of Mid1/Fxy (including the last three exons) that lies within the PAR [122]; B, the region that contains the multi-copy locus DXYHgu1 [123]; and C, the region containing Sts [124]. It is now known that Erdr1 is located in the PAR just distal to Mid1 and is retained in Y* and XY*—thus, it maps to the PAR region B [125]. On the other hand, Asmt is absent in Y* and XY*—thus, it maps to the PAR region C [126]. Sts is thought to be distal to Asmt, but this has not been confirmed](/paper-figures/1e421306cefc4b7d9a2a470e097cafa3/a-primer-on-the-use-of-mouse-models-for-identifying-direct-sex-chromosome-figure-3.jpg)

Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the four core genotypes mouse model which incorporates mice with four different combinations of gonads and sex chromosomes [66, 67], has helped identify the influence of sex chromosomes on physical traits, such as obesity and food intake [68, 69].”
From Integrating Transwomen and Female Athletes with Differences of Sex Development (DSD) into Elite Competition: The FIMS 2021 Consensus Statement (2021) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
Wang, H., Yang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Dawlaty, M. M., Cheng, A. W., Zhang, F., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · Cited by 3,495
Sinclair, A. H., Berta, P., Palmer, M. S., Hawkins, J. R., Griffiths, B. L., Smith, M. J., Foster, J. W., Frischauf, A., Lovell-Badge, R. H., & Goodfellow, P. N. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346240a0 · Cited by 3,234
Male development of chromosomally female mice transgenic for Sry
Koopman, P. A., Gubbay, J., Vivian, N., Goodfellow, P. N., & Lovell-Badge, R. H. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351117a0 · Cited by 2,193
The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes
Skaletsky, H., Kuroda-Kawaguchi, T., Minx, P. J., Cordum, H. S., Hillier, L., Brown, L. G., Repping, S., Pyntikova, T., Ali, J., Bieri, T. A., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01722 · Cited by 2,148
Gubbay, J., Collignon, J., Koopman, P. A., Capel, B., Economou, A., Münsterberg, A., Vivian, N., Goodfellow, P. N., & Lovell-Badge, R. H. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346245a0 · Cited by 1,675
Myogenin, a factor regulating myogenesis, has a domain homologous to MyoD
Wright, W. E., Sassoon, D. A., & Lin, V. K. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90583-7 · Cited by 1,261
Four Evolutionary Strata on the Human X Chromosome
Lahn, B. T., & Page, D. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5441.964 · Cited by 1,010
The degeneration of Y chromosomes
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D. (2000) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0717 · Cited by 931
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oyola, M. G., & Handa, R. J. (2017) · Stress · doi:10.1080/10253890.2017.1369523 · Cited by 710
“For a detailed review on the direct influence of sex chromosomes on brain sexual differentiation see Arnold (2017) and Burgoyne and Arnold (2016).”
BackgroundVertebrate sex determination: evolutionary plasticity of a fundamental switch
Capel, B. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.60 · Cited by 521
Sexual Dimorphism in Innate Immunity: The Role of Sex Hormones and Epigenetics
Shepherd, R., Cheung, A. S., Pang, K. C., Saffery, R., & Novakovic, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.604000 · Cited by 322
The role of sex in the genomics of human complex traits
Khramtsova, E. A., Davis, L. K., & Stranger, B. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0083-1 · Cited by 303
A Guide for the Design of Pre-clinical Studies on Sex Differences in Metabolism
Mauvais‐Jarvis, F., Arnold, A. P., & Reue, K. (2017) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.033 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgoyne, P. S., & Arnold, A. P.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Medical Research (GB)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arnold, Arthur P.
- Venue
- Biology of Sex Differences
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-68
- ISSN
- 2042-6410 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5154145
- OpenAlex
- W2563939294
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 144
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biology of Sex Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The Francis Crick Institute (cc-by)
- Funders
- UK Medical Research Council (U117532009)
- NIMH (MH59268)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC000217)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS045966, NS043196,)
- NIDDK (DK083561)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD076125)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL119886, HL131182)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Keywords
- sex differences, mouse model, SRY, Y chromosome, X chromosome, gonadal hormones, sexual differentiation, candidate gene identification, sex chromosome inactivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review