Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 894

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey of machine learning for big data processing

Open access
Qiu, Junfei, Wu, Qihui, Ding, Guoru, Xu, Yuhua, Feng, Shuo·2016·EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Abstract

There is no doubt that big data are now rapidly expanding in all science and engineering domains. While the potential of these massive data is undoubtedly significant, fully making sense of them requires new ways of thinking and novel learning techniques to address the various challenges. In this paper, we present a literature survey of the latest advances in researches on machine learning for big data processing. First, we review the machine learning techniques and highlight some promising learning methods in recent studies, such as representation learning, deep learning, distributed and parallel learning, transfer learning, active learning, and kernel-based learning. Next, we focus on the analysis and discussions about the challenges and possible solutions of machine learning for big data. Following that, we investigate the close connections of machine learning with signal processing techniques for big data processing. Finally, we outline several open issues and research trends.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13634-016-0355-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 121

  1. A Sandryhaila, JMF Moura, Big data analysis with signal processing on graphs: representation and processing of massive data sets with irregular structure. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 31(5), 80–90 (2014) · DOI
  2. J Gantz, D Reinsel, Extracting value from chaos (EMC, Hopkinton, 2011)
  3. J Gantz, D Reinsel, The digital universe decade—are you ready (EMC, Hopkinton, 2010)
  4. D Che, M Safran, Z Peng, From big data to big data mining: challenges, issues, and opportunities, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on DASFAA (Wuhan, 2013), pp. 1–15 · DOI
  5. H Hu, Y Wen, T Chua, X Li, Toward scalable systems for big data analytics: a technology tutorial. IEEE Access 2, 652–687 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  6. J Manyika, M Chui, B Brown, J Bughin, R Dobbs, C Roxburgh, AH Byers, Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity (McKinsey Global Institute, USA, 2011)
  7. Q Wu, G Ding, Y Xu, S Feng, Z Du, J Wang, K Long, Cognitive internet of things: a new paradigm beyond connection. IEEE Internet Things J 1(2), 129–143 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  8. A Imran, A Zoha, Challenges in 5G: how to empower SON with big data for enabling 5G. IEEE Netw 28(6), 27–33 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  9. A Rajaraman, JD Ullman, Mining of massive data sets (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2011) · DOI
  10. XW Chen, X Lin, Big data deep learning: challenges and perspectives. IEEE Access 2, 514–525 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  11. K Slavakis, GB Giannakis, G Mateos, Modeling and optimization for big data analytics: (statistical) learning tools for our era of data deluge. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 31(5), 18–31 (2014) · DOI
  12. TM Mitchell, Machine learning (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997)
  13. S Russell, P Norvig, Artificial intelligence: a modern approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1995)
  14. V Cherkassky, FM Mulier, Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods (John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2007) · DOI
  15. C Rudin, KL Wagstaff, Machine learning for science and society. Mach Learn 95(1), 1–9 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  16. CM Bishop, Pattern recognition and machine learning (Springer, New York, 2006)
  17. B Adam, IFC Smith, F Asce, Reinforcement learning for structural control. J Comput Civil Eng 22(2), 133–139 (2008) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2008)22:2(133
  18. N Jones, Computer science: the learning machines. Nature 505(7482), 146–148 (2014) · DOI
  19. J Langford, Tutorial on practical prediction theory for classification. J Mach Learn Res 6(3), 273–306 (2005)
  20. R Bekkerman, EY Ran, N Tishby, Y Winter, Distributional word clusters vs. words for text categorization. J Mach Learn Res 3, 1183–1208 (2003)
  21. Y Bengio, A Courville, P Vincent, Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 35(8), 1798–1828 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  22. F Huang, E Yates, Biased representation learning for domain adaptation, in Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (Jeju Island, 2012), pp. 1313–1323
  23. W Tu, S Sun, Cross-domain representation-learning framework with combination of class-separate and domain-merge objectives, in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Cross Domain Knowledge Discovery in Web and Social Network Mining (Beijing, 2012), pp. 18–25 · DOI
  24. S Li, C Huang, C Zong, Multi-domain sentiment classification with classifier combination. J Comput Sci Technol 26(1), 25–33 (2011) · DOI
  25. F Huang, E Yates, Exploring representation-learning approaches to domain adaptation, in Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Domain Adaptation for Natural Language Processing (Uppsala, 2010), pp. 23–30
  26. A Bordes, X Glorot, JWAY Bengio, Joint learning of words and meaning representations for open-text semantic parsing, in Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (La Palma, 2012), pp. 127–135
  27. N. Boulanger-Lewandowski, Y. Bengio, P. Vincent, Modeling temporal dependencies in high-dimensional sequences: application to polyphonic music generation and transcription. arXiv preprint (2012). arXiv:1206.6392 · arXiv
  28. K Dwivedi, K Biswaranjan, A Sethi, Drowsy driver detection using representation learning, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (Gurgaon, 2014), pp. 995–999 · DOI
  29. D Yu, L Deng, Deep learning and its applications to signal and information processing. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 28(1), 145–154 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  30. I Arel, DC Rose, TP Karnowski, Deep machine learning-a new frontier in artificial intelligence research. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 5(4), 13–18 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  31. Y Bengio, Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations Trends Mach Learn 2(1), 1–127 (2009) · DOI
  32. R Collobert, J Weston, L Bottou, M Karlen, K Kavukcuoglu, P Kuksa, Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J Mach Learn Res 12, 2493–2537 (2011)
  33. P Le Callet, C Viard-Gaudin, D Barba, A convolutional neural network approach for objective video quality assessment. IEEE Trans Neural Networ 17(5), 1316–1327 (2006) · DOI
  34. DC Ciresan, U Meier, LM Gambardella, J Schmidhuber, Deep, big, simple neural nets for handwritten digit recognition. Neural Comput 22(12), 3207–3220 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  35. Y Wang, D Yu, Y Ju, A Acero, Voice search, in Language understanding: systems for extracting semantic information from speech (Wiley, New York, 2011)
  36. D Peteiro-Barral, B Guijarro-Berdiñas, A survey of methods for distributed machine learning. Progress in Artificial Intelligence 2(1), 1–11 (2012) · DOI
  37. H Zheng, SR Kulkarni, HV Poor, Attribute-distributed learning: models, limits, and algorithms. IEEE Trans Signal Process 59(1), 386–398 (2011) · DOI
  38. H Chen, T Li, C Luo, SJ Horng, G Wang, A rough set-based method for updating decision rules on attribute values’ coarsening and refining. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(12), 2886–2899 (2014) · DOI
  39. J Chen, C Wang, R Wang, Using stacked generalization to combine SVMs in magnitude and shape feature spaces for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote 47(7), 2193–2205 (2009) · DOI
  40. E Leyva, A González, R Pérez, A set of complexity measures designed for applying meta-learning to instance selection. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 27(2), 354–367 (2014) · DOI
  41. M Sarnovsky, M Vronc, Distributed boosting algorithm for classification of text documents, in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) (Herl'any, 2014), pp. 217–220 · DOI
  42. SR Upadhyaya, Parallel approaches to machine learning—a comprehensive survey. J Parallel Distr Com 73(3), 284–292 (2013) · DOI
  43. R Bekkerman, M Bilenko, J Langford, Scaling up machine learning: parallel and distributed approaches (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2011) · DOI
  44. EW Xiang, B Cao, DH Hu, Q Yang, Bridging domains using world wide knowledge for transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(6), 770–783 (2010) · DOI
  45. W Fan, I Davidson, B Zadrozny, PS Yu, An improved categorization of classifier’s sensitivity on sample selection bias, in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (Brussels, 2012), pp. 605–608 · DOI
  46. J Gao, W Fan, J Jiang, J Han, Knowledge transfer via multiple model local structure mapping, in Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Las Vegas, 2008), pp. 283-291 · DOI · Paper page
  47. C Wang, S Mahadevan, Manifold alignment using procrustes analysis, in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (Helsinki, 2008), pp. 1120–1127 · DOI
  48. X Ling, W Dai, GR Xue, Q Yang, Y Yu, Spectral domain-transfer learning, in Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Las Vegas, 2008), pp. 488–496 · DOI
  49. R Raina, AY Ng, D Koller, 2006, Constructing informative priors using transfer learning, in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (Pittsburgh, 2006), pp. 713–720 · DOI · Paper page
  50. J Zhang, Deep transfer learning via restricted Boltzmann machine for document classification, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications and Workshops (ICMLA) (Honolulu, 2011), pp. 323–326 · DOI
  51. Y Fu, B Li, X Zhu, C Zhang, Active learning without knowing individual instance labels: a pairwise label homogeneity query approach. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(4), 808–822 (2014) · DOI
  52. B Settles, Active learning literature survey (University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2010)
  53. MM Crawford, D Tuia, HL Yang, Active learning: any value for classification of remotely sensed data? P IEEE 101(3), 593–608 (2013) · DOI
  54. MM Haque, LB Holder, MK Skinner, DJ Cook, Generalized query-based active learning to identify differentially methylated regions in DNA. IEEE ACM Trans Comput Bi 10(3), 632–644 (2013)
  55. D Tuia, M Volpi, L Copa, M Kanevski, J Munoz-Mari, A survey of active learning algorithms for supervised remote sensing image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Sign Proces 5(3), 606–617 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  56. G Ding, Q Wu, YD Yao, J Wang, Y Chen, Kernel-based learning for statistical signal processing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 30(4), 126–136 (2013) · DOI
  57. C Li, M Georgiopoulos, GC Anagnostopoulos, A unifying framework for typical multitask multiple kernel learning problems. IEEE Trans Neur Net Lear Syst 25(7), 1287–1297 (2014) · DOI
  58. G Montavon, M Braun, T Krueger, KR Muller, Analyzing local structure in kernel-based learning: explanation, complexity, and reliability assessment. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 30(4), 62–74 (2013) · DOI
  59. K Slavakis, S Theodoridis, I Yamada, Online kernel-based classification using adaptive projection algorithms. IEEE Trans Signal Process 56(7), 2781–2796 (2008) · DOI
  60. S Theodoridis, K Slavakis, I Yamada, Adaptive learning in a world of projections. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 28(1), 97–123 (2011) · DOI
  61. K Slavakis, S Theodoridis, I Yamada, Adaptive constrained learning in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: the robust beamforming case. IEEE Trans Signal Process 57(12), 4744–4764 (2009) · DOI
  62. K Slavakis, P Bouboulis, S Theodoridis, Adaptive multiregression in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: the multiaccess MIMO channel case. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23(2), 260–276 (2012) · DOI
  63. KR Müller, S Mika, G Rätsch, K Tsuda, B Schölkopf, An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Networ 12(2), 181–201 (2001) · DOI
  64. TH Davenport, P Barth, R Bean, How “big data” is different. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 54(1), 22–24 (2012)
  65. F Andersson, M Carlsson, JY Tourneret, H Wendt, A new frequency estimation method for equally and unequally spaced data. IEEE Trans Signal Process 62(21), 5761–5774 (2014) · DOI
  66. F Lin, M Fardad, MR Jovanovic, Design of optimal sparse feedback gains via the alternating direction method of multipliers. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 58(9), 2426–2431 (2013) · DOI
  67. S Boyd, N Parikh, E Chu, B Peleato, J Eckstein, Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations Trends Mach Learn 3(1), 1–122 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  68. J Dean, S Ghemawat, MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51(1), 107–113 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  69. J Dean, S Ghemawat, MapReduce: a flexible data processing tool. Commun ACM 53(1), 72–77 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  70. C Chu, SK Kim, YA Lin, Y Yu, G Bradski, AY Ng, K Olukotun, Map-reduce for machine learning on multicore, in Proceedings of 20th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (Vancouver, 2006), pp. 281–288 · DOI · Paper page
  71. M Armbrust, A Fox, R Griffith, AD Joseph, R Katz, A Konwinski, G Lee, D Patterson, A Rabkin, I Stoica, M Zaharia, A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM 53(4), 50–58 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  72. MD Dikaiakos, D Katsaros, P Mehra, G Pallis, A Vakali, Cloud computing: distributed internet computing for IT and scientific research. IEEE Internet Comput 13(5), 10–13 (2009) · DOI
  73. Y Low, D Bickson, J Gonzalez, C Guestrin, A Kyrola, JM Hellerstein, Distributed GraphLab: a framework for machine learning and data mining in the cloud. Proc VLDB Endow 5(8), 716–727 (2012) · DOI
  74. M Lenzerini, Data integration: a theoretical perspective, in Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (Madison, 2002), pp. 233–246 · DOI
  75. A Halevy, A Rajaraman, J Ordille, Data integration: the teenage years, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB) (Seoul, 2006), pp. 9–16
  76. Q Wu, G Ding, J Wang, YD Yao, Spatial-temporal opportunity detection for spectrum-heterogeneous cognitive radio networks: two-dimensional sensing. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(2), 516–526 (2013) · DOI
  77. N Srivastava, RR Salakhutdinov, Multimodal learning with deep boltzmann machines, in Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (NIPS) (Nevada, 2012), pp. 2222–2230
  78. Y Sun, S Todorovic, S Goodison, Local-learning-based feature selection for high-dimensional data analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(9), 1610–1626 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  79. LJP van der Maaten, EO Postma, HJ van den Herik, Dimensionality reduction: a comparative review. J Mach Learn Res 10(1-41), 66–71 (2009)
  80. M Mardani, G Mateos, GB Giannakis, Subspace learning and imputation for streaming big data matrices and tensors. IEEE Trans Signal Process 63(10), 2663–2677 (2015) · DOI
  81. K Mohan, M Fazel, New restricted isometry results for noisy low-rank recovery, in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings (ISIT) (Texas, 2010), pp. 1573–1577 · DOI
  82. EJ Candès, X Li, Y Ma, J Wright, Robust principal component analysis? J ACM 58(3), 1–37 (2011) · DOI
  83. Z Lin, R Liu, Z Su, Linearized alternating direction method with adaptive penalty for low-rank representation, in Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (NIPS) (Granada, 2011), pp. 612–620
  84. S Shalev-Shwartz, Online learning and online convex optimization. Foundations Trends Mach Learn 4, 107–194 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  85. J Wang, P Zhao, SC Hoi, R Jin, Online feature selection and its applications. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(3), 698–710 (2014) · DOI
  86. J Kivinen, AJ Smola, RC Williamson, Online learning with kernels. IEEE Trans Signal Process 52(8), 2165–2176 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  87. M Bilenko, S Basil, M Sahami, Adaptive product normalization: using online learning for record linkage in comparison shopping, in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (Texas, 2005), p. 8 · DOI
  88. GB Huang, QY Zhu, CK Siew, Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1), 489–501 (2006) · DOI · Paper page
  89. S Ding, X Xu, R Nie, Extreme learning machine and its applications. Neural Comput Appl 25(3-4), 549–556 (2014) · DOI
  90. N Tatbul, Streaming data integration: challenges and opportunities, in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) (Long Beach, 2010), pp. 155–158 · DOI
  91. DJ Abadi, Y Ahmad, M Balazinska, U Cetintemel, M Cherniack, JH Hwang, W Lindner, A Maskey, A Rasin, E Ryvkina, N Tatbul, Y Xing, SB Zdonik, The design of the borealis stream processing engine, in Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR) (Asilomar, 2005), pp. 277–289
  92. L Neumeyer, B Robbins, A Nair, A Kesari, S4: Distributed stream computing platform, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) (Sydney, 2010), pp. 170–177 · DOI
  93. K Goodhope, J Koshy, J Kreps, N Narkhede, R Park, J Rao, VY Ye, Building Linkedin’s real-time activity data pipeline. IEEE Data Eng Bull 35(2), 33–45 (2012)
  94. W Yang, X Liu, L Zhang, LT Yang, Big data real-time processing based on storm, in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) (Melbourne, 2013), pp. 1784–1787 · DOI
  95. B SkieS, Streaming big data processing in datacenter clouds. IEEE Cloud Comput 1, 78–83 (2014)
  96. A Baldominos, E Albacete, Y Saez, P Isasi, A scalable machine learning online service for big data real-time analysis, in Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Big Data (CIBD) (Orlando, 2014), pp. 1–8 · DOI
  97. NY Soltani, SJ Kim, GB Giannakis, Real-time load elasticity tracking and pricing for electric vehicle charging. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6(3), 1303–1313 (2014) · DOI
  98. S Tsang, B Kao, KY Yip, WS Ho, SD Lee, Decision trees for uncertain data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 23(1), 64–78 (2011) · DOI
  99. F Nie, H Wang, X Cai, H Huang, C Ding, Robust matrix completion via joint schatten p-norm and lp-norm minimization, in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (Brussels, 2012), p. 566 · DOI
  100. G Ding, J Wang, Q Wu, L Zhang, Y Zou, YD Yao, Y Chen, Robust spectrum sensing with crowd sensors. IEEE Trans Commun 62(9), 3129–3143 (2014) · DOI
  101. U Fayyad, G Piatetsky-Shapiro, P Smyth, From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Mag 17(3), 37–54 (1996)
  102. J Kelly III, S Hamm, Smart machines: IBM’s Watson and the era of cognitive computing (Columbia University Press, New York, 2013)
  103. K Slavakis, SJ Kim, G Mateos, GB Giannakis, Stochastic approximation vis-a-vis online learning for big data analytics. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 31(6), 124–129 (2014) · DOI
  104. V Cevher, S Becker, M Schmidt, Convex optimization for big data: scalable, randomized, and parallel algorithms for big data analytics. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 31(5), 32–43 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  105. A Tajer, VV Veeravalli, HV Poor, Outlying sequence detection in large data sets: a data-driven approach. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 31(5), 44–56 (2014) · DOI
  106. S Scardapane, D Wang, M Panella, A Uncini, Distributed learning for random vector functional-link networks. Inf Sci 301, 271–284 (2015) · DOI
  107. A Daneshmand, F Facchinei, V Kungurtsev, G Scutari, Hybrid random/deterministic parallel algorithms for nonconvex big data optimization. IEEE Trans Signal Process 63(15), 3914–3929 (2015) · DOI
  108. P. Bianchi, W. Hachem, F. Iutzeler, A stochastic coordinate descent primal-dual algorithm and applications to large-scale composite optimization. arXiv preprint (2014). arXiv:1407.0898 · arXiv
  109. HT Wai, TH Chang, A Scaglione, A consensus-based decentralized algorithm for non-convex optimization with application to dictionary learning, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (South Brisbane, 2015), pp. 3546–3550 · DOI
  110. D. Berberidis, V. Kekatos, G.B. Giannakis, Online censoring for large-scale regressions with application to streaming big data. arXiv preprint (2015). arXiv:1507.07536 · arXiv
  111. K. Slavakis, G.B. Giannakis, Per-block-convex data modeling by accelerated stochastic approximation. arXiv preprint (2015). arXiv:1501.07315 · arXiv
  112. KC Chen, SL Huang, L Zheng, HV Poor, Communication theoretic data analytics. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 33(4), 663–675 (2015) · DOI
  113. J Zheng, F Shen, H Fan, J Zhao, An online incremental learning support vector machine for large-scale data. Neural Comput Appl 22(5), 1023–1035 (2013) · DOI
  114. C Ghosh, C Cordeiro, DP Agrawal, M Bhaskara Rao, Markov chain existence and hidden Markov models in spectrum sensing, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing & Communications (PERCOM) (Galveston, 2009), pp. 1–6 · DOI
  115. K Yue, Q Fang, X Wang, J Li, W Weiy, A parallel and incremental approach for data-intensive learning of Bayesian networks. IEEE Trans Cybern 99, 1–15 (2015) · DOI
  116. X Dong, Y Li, C Wu, Y Cai, A learner based on neural network for cognitive radio, in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT) (Nanjing, 2010), pp. 893–896 · DOI
  117. A El-Hajj, L Safatly, M Bkassiny, M Husseini, Cognitive radio transceivers: RF, spectrum sensing, and learning algorithms review. Int J Antenn Propag 11(5), 479–482 (2014)
  118. M Bkassiny, SK Jayaweera, Y Li, Multidimensional dirichlet process-based non-parametric signal classification for autonomous self-learning cognitive radios. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(11), 5413–5423 (2013) · DOI
  119. A Galindo-Serrano, L Giupponi, Distributed Q-learning for aggregated interference control in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(4), 1823–1834 (2010) · DOI
  120. TK Das, A Gosavi, S Mahadevan, N Marchalleck, Solving semi-markov decision problems using average reward reinforcement learning. Manage Sci 45(4), 560–574 (1999) · DOI
  121. S Singh, T Jaakkola, ML Littman, C Szepesvári, Convergence results for single-step on-policy reinforcement-learning algorithms. Mach Learn 38, 287–308 (2000) · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Qiu, J., Wu, Q., Ding, G., Xu, Y., & Feng, S.
Venue
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
Published
2016-05-28
Volume
2016
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1110-8657 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-6180
OpenAlex
W2406349003
Cited by
894
References
7
FWCI
101.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) (No. 61301160, No. 61172062)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.