Cited by 74Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Lithium in the episode and suicide prophylaxis and in augmenting strategies in patients with unipolar depression

Open access
Abou-Saleh, Mohammed T., Müller-Oerlinghausen, Bruno, Coppen, Alec J.·2017·International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depressive disorders are a leading cause of the global burden of disease and are associated with high recurrent often continuing morbidity and high excess mortality by suicide and cardiovascular disease. Whilst there are established, effective and cost-effective treatments for depression, their long-term management is often neglected: there is continuing controversy over the case of need for long-term treatment including lifelong treatment and safety issues. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: In this narrative review, we critically examine the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of lithium salts in the long-term management of unipolar depression. We refer to existing recent international guidelines as well as the scientific literature selectively and against the background of our longstanding experience with patients suffering from unipolar depression who are often under treated or inappropriately treated. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: According to many studies mostly dating back to the 1970/1980s, lithium is efficacious in the prophylaxis of unipolar depression particularly depression with melancholia and delusional depression and showing a clearly episodic course. Also the efficacy of lithium maintenance treatment following recovery by ECT has been clearly shown. Moreover, convincing evidence exists that lithium has added value and benefit for its unique anti-suicidal effects as well as reducing mortality by other causes. The anti-suicidal effect has been convincingly demonstrated in bipolar as well as in unipolar patients. Nevertheless its use in the management of patients with unipolar depression has not been properly recognized by a majority of textbooks and guidelines. Whilst it has been well considered as an effective treatment for depression that has not responded to antidepressants as an adjunct treatment, also called augmentation, it has been much less recommended for the prevention of recurrent episodes of unipolar depression. One of the reasons for this neglect is the blurring of the diagnosis "unipolar depression" by modern diagnostic tools. Lithium will hardly work in a patient with "unipolar depression spectrum disease". CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that lithium is an effective prophylactic treatment for carefully selected patients with unipolar depression and is safe when prescribed in recommended doses/plasma lithium levels and with regular, careful monitoring. We propose that lithium prophylaxis can be indicated in patients with unipolar depression and that the occurrence of 2 episodes of depression within 5 years is a practical criterion for starting lithium prophylaxis particularly in severe depression with psychotic features and high suicidal risk. Furthermore, an indication might be considered especially in unipolar patients in whom a bipolar background is suspected. In some cases, lithium prophylaxis may be recommended after a single episode of depression that is severe with high suicidal risk and continued life-long.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40345-017-0080-x

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary research indicates that pharmacotherapy is probably more effective than psychotherapy in individuals with dysthymia and persistent depression.

    “preliminary research indicates that pharmacotherapy is probably more effective than psychotherapy in individuals with dysthymia and persistent depression, 620”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abou-Saleh, M. T., Müller-Oerlinghausen, B., & Coppen, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft (DE)
  • NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (EE)
Venue
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
Published
2017-05-08
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
11-11
ISSN
2194-7511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588577458
Cited by
74
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
lithium, major depressive disorder, depression prevention, suicide prevention, lithium augmentation, antidepressant augmentation, long-term maintenance therapy, bipolar depression, endogenous depression, delusional depression, electroconvulsive therapy, suicide risk, recurrent depression, bipolar spectrum disorders, treatment guidelines, cardiovascular mortality, undertreatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review