Cited by 39Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

What bereaved parents want health care providers to know when their babies are stillborn: a community-based participatory study

Open access
Farrales, Lynn L., Cacciatore, Joanne, Jonas-Simpson, Christine, Dharamsi, Shafik, Ascher, Jaime, Klein, Michael C.·2020·BMC Psychology

Abstract

Background: Bereaved parents experience higher rates of depressive and post-traumatic stress symptoms after the stillbirth of a baby than after live-birth. Yet, these effects remain underreported in the literature and, consequently, insufficiently addressed in health provider education and practice. We conducted a participatory based study to explore the experiences of grieving parents during their interaction with health care providers during and after the stillbirth of a baby. Methods: This community-based participatory study utilized four focus groups comprised of twenty-seven bereaved parents (44% fathers). Bereaved parents conceptualized the study, participating at all stages of research, analyses, and drafting. Data were reduced into a main theme and subthemes, then broad-based member checked to ensure fidelity and nuances within themes. Results: The major theme that emerged centered on provider acknowledgement of the baby as an irreplaceable individual. Subthemes reflected 1) acknowledgement of parenthood and grief, 2) recognition of the traumatic nature of stillbirth, and 3) acknowledgement of enduring grief coupled with access to support. It was important that providers realized how grief was experienced within health care and social support systems, concretized by their desire for long-term, specialized support. Conclusions: Both mothers and fathers feel that acknowledgement of their baby as an individual, their parenthood, and their enduring traumatic grief by healthcare providers are key elements required in the process of initiating immediate and ongoing care after the stillbirth of a baby.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40359-020-0385-x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiences within the healthcare system following pregnancy loss or neonatal death have been established as fundamental to shaping bereaved parents' grief experience.

    “Finally, at the system/policy level, experiences within the healthcare system following pregnancy loss or neonatal death have been established as fundamental to shaping bereaved parents’ grief experience [4, 9, 42].”

    From Factors contributing to men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death: further development of an emerging model in an Australian sample (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Background describes healthcare providers’ role around stillbirth as critical, and the Conclusion says provider acknowledgement may affect bereaved parents for years. The study concerns parents whose babies were stillborn; it does not establish the same finding for neonatal death or pregnancy loss more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Parents appreciated when care was taken to minimize environmental exposures to pregnant women and living babies, and described these environmental exposures as intensifying their traumatic experience when they were not minimized.

    “Adapting the environment is likely not feasible in every situation; however, parents appreciated when care was taken to minimize environmental exposures to pregnant women and living babies (19) and described these environmental exposures as “[intensifying] their traumatic experience” when they were not minimized (24, p.5).”

    From Parent hospital experiences following stillbirth (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Parents in other studies have been surprised by postpartum changes like lactation.

    “Parents in other studies have been surprised by postpartum changes like lactation (24).”

    From Parent hospital experiences following stillbirth (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Healthcare providers have a significant impact on the hospital experience of parents when their baby is stillborn.

    “Given the significant impact healthcare providers have on the hospital experience of parents when their baby is stillborn (19, 24), addressing these gaps is critical to providing comprehensive care.”

    From Parent hospital experiences following stillbirth (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
  2. [25]Hutti M Social and professional support needs of families after perinatal loss J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006 34 5 630 638 10.1177/0884217505279998 16227519 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farrales, L. L., Cacciatore, J., Jonas-Simpson, C., Dharamsi, S., Ascher, J., & Klein, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cacciatore, Joanne
Venue
BMC Psychology
Published
2020-02-17
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
18-18
ISSN
2050-7283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012919789
Cited by
39
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Collections
Funders
British Columbia College of Family Physicians (N/A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
stillbirth, bereaved parents, grief, healthcare provider-patient communication, traumatic grief, post-traumatic stress, postpartum depression, social support, long-term support
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Fathers, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mothers, Parents, Pregnancy, Professional-Patient Relations, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review