The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular diversity of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases, and antimicrobial resistance
Open accessAbstract
Along with the recent spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria, outbreaks of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase-producing bacteria present a serious challenge to clinicians. β-lactam antibiotics are the most frequently used antibacterial agents and ESBLs, and carbapenemases confer resistance not only to carbapenem antibiotics but also to penicillin and cephem antibiotics. The mechanism of β-lactam resistance involves an efflux pump, reduced permeability, altered transpeptidases, and inactivation by β-lactamases. Horizontal gene transfer is the most common mechanism associated with the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactam- and carbapenem resistance among pathogenic bacterial species. Along with the increase in antimicrobial resistance, many different types of ESBLs and carbapenemases have emerged with different enzymatic characteristics. For example, carbapenemases are represented across classes A to D of the Ambler classification system. Because bacteria harboring different types of ESBLs and carbapenemases require specific therapeutic strategies, it is essential for clinicians to understand the characteristics of infecting pathogens. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on carbapenem resistance by ESBLs and carbapenemases, such as class A carbapenemases, class C extended-spectrum AmpC (ESAC), carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases (CHDLs), and class B metallo-β-lactamases, with the aim of aiding critical care clinicians in their therapeutic decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Magiorakos, A.-P., Srinivasan, A., Carey, R. B., Carmeli, Y., Falagas, M. E., Giske, C. G., Harbarth, S., Hindler, J. F., Kahlmeter, G., Olsson-Liljequist, B., et al. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x · Cited by 14,449
Updated Functional Classification of β-Lactamases
Bush, K., & Jacoby, G. A. (2010) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01009-09 · Cited by 2,367
Yigit, H., Queenan, A. M., Anderson, G. J., Domenech-Sanchez, A., Biddle, J. W., Steward, C. D., Alberti, S., Bush, K., & Tenover, F. C. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.1151-1161.2001 · Cited by 1,639
Cited by
Urinary Tract Infections: The Current Scenario and Future Prospects
Mancuso, G., Midiri, A., Gerace, E., Marra, M., Zummo, S., & Biondo, C. (2023) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens12040623 · Cited by 396
Ma, J., Song, X., Li, M., Yu, Z., Cheng, W., Yu, Z., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Shen, A., Sun, H., et al. (2023) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2022.127249 · Cited by 308
Ramos, S., Silva, V., Dapkevicius, M. D. L. E., Caniça, M., Tejedor-Junco, M. T., Igrejas, G., & Poeta, P. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122239 · Cited by 293
Pu, D., Zhao, J., Chang, K., Zhuo, X., & Cao, B. (2023) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2023.09.040 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawa, T., Kooguchi, K., & Moriyama, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Intensive Care
- Published
- 2020-01-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-13
- ISSN
- 2052-0492 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005363101
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular diversity of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases, and antimicrobial resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40560-020-0429-6
- The paper
- Sawa, T., Kooguchi, K., & Moriyama, K. (2020). Molecular diversity of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases, and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Intensive Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-0429-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.