The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Challenge of Applying and Undertaking Research in Female Sport
Open accessAbstract
In recent years there has been an exponential rise in the professionalism and success of female sports. Practitioners (e.g., sport science professionals) aim to apply evidence-informed approaches to optimise athlete performance and well-being. Evidence-informed practices should be derived from research literature. Given the lack of research on elite female athletes, this is challenging at present. This limits the ability to adopt an evidence-informed approach when working in female sports, and as such, we are likely failing to maximize the performance potential of female athletes. This article discusses the challenges of applying an evidence base derived from male athletes to female athletes. A conceptual framework is presented, which depicts the need to question the current (male) evidence base due to the differences of the “female athlete” and the “female sporting environment,” which pose a number of challenges for practitioners working in the field. Until a comparable applied sport science research evidence base is established in female athletes, evidence-informed approaches will remain a challenge for those working in female sport.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodological Recommendations for Menstrual Cycle Research in Sports and Exercise
JANSE DE JONGE, X., THOMPSON, B., & HAN, A. (2019) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002073 · Cited by 382
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
Iqbal, S. A., Wallach, J. D., Khoury, M. J., Schully, S. D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333 · Cited by 310
Cited by
McNulty, K. L., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Dolan, E., Swinton, P. A., Ansdell, P., Goodall, S., Thomas, K., & Hicks, K. M. (2020) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-020-01319-3 · Cited by 812
“Invisible sportswomen”: The sex data gap in sport and exercise science research
Cowley, E. S., Olenick, A. A., McNulty, K. L., & Ross, E. Z. (2021) · Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal · doi:10.1123/wspaj.2021-0028 · Cited by 449
Smith, E. S., McKay, A. K. A., Kuikman, M., Ackerman, K. E., Harris, R., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Stellingwerff, T., & Burke, L. M. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14050953 · Cited by 113
“Such a discrepancy warrants investigation, with potential contributors including smaller numbers of women within teams/clubs or professional sports per se [28], difficulties in recruiting female participants (e.”
BackgroundMascaro, L., Drummond, S. P. A., Leota, J., Boardman, J. M., Hoffman, D., Rajaratnam, S. M. W., Aidman, E., & Facer-Childs, E. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1118822 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Emmonds, S., Heyward, O., & Jones, B.
- Venue
- Sports Medicine - Open
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-51
- ISSN
- 2198-9761 (ISSN-L)
- 2199-1170
- OpenAlex
- W2995710552
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.