Cited by 7Cancer Risks and FactorsCancer survivorship and careObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Pilot randomised controlled trial of Weight Watchers® referral with or without dietitian-led group support for weight loss in women treated for breast cancer: the BRIGHT (BReast cancer weIGHT loss) trial

Open access
Newlands, Rumana S. N., Ntessalen, Maria, Clark, Julia, Fielding, Shona, Hoddinott, Pat, Heys, Steven D., McNeill, Geraldine, Craig, Leone C. A.·2019·Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Being overweight or obese following breast cancer diagnosis can increase cancer recurrence and mortality, so effective interventions for weight loss in this group could enhance survival. A pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted to assess whether a weight loss programme comprising generic Weight Watchers® referral offered to women treated for breast cancer with or without additional breast cancer-tailored dietetic support is feasible and shows promise for improving weight and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: = 15). Feasibility was assessed based on retention rate, recruitment and randomisation process, meeting attendance, suitability of the setting and outcome measurement tools, unintended consequences, cost and observations of the dietetic sessions. Outcomes were measured at 0, 3 ('trial exit') and 12 months post intervention. RESULTS: ) were randomised. Data from 38 (84%) and 30 (67%) participants were available at trial exit and 12 months respectively. Feasibility issues included slow recruitment process, lack of blinding throughout, weighing scales not measuring > 150 kg, lack of clear instructions for completing QoL questionnaire and workload and time pressures in delivering dietetic sessions. Participants had good attendance rate at group meetings and no serious unintended consequences were reported. WW Plus was most expensive to run. Mean (95% CI) weight change at trial exit was - 3.67 kg (- 5.67, - 2.07) in WW Plus, - 6.03 kg (- 7.61, - 4.44) in WW group and + 0.19 kg (- 1.45, + 1.83) in control group. About 40% of the WW Plus, 64% of the WW group and 56% of the control group lost ≥ 5% of their baseline weight by 12 months. All groups showed promise for improving QoL at trial exit but only the WW group maintained significant improvements from baseline at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The trial procedures were feasible, with some modifications. This pilot trial indicates the benefits of providing free WW vouchers for weight loss maintenance and improving QoL but provided no evidence that including additional dietetic support would add any extra value. Further research with WW with long-term follow-up should be undertaken to assess weight loss sustainability and benefit on health outcomes in this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN-29623418.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40814-019-0405-x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [27]Newlands R Clark J Craig L McNeill G Hoddinott P Heys S A survey to inform the design of a weight loss programme for overweight and obese women treated for breast cancer Proceedings of the Future Food and Health: April 5–6 2012 Aberdeen The Nutrition Society
  2. [28]Newlands R Clark J Craig L McNeill G Hoddinott P Heys S Focus group discussions to inform the design of a weight loss programme suitable for overweight and obese women treated for breast cancer Proceedings of the Future Food and Health: April 5–6 2012 Aberdeen The Nutrition Society
  3. [29]Newlands R Clark J Craig L McNeill G Hoddinott P Heys S Interventions to promote weight loss in women treated for breast cancer: a systematic review Proceedings of the The European Congress on Obesity (ECO): Obesity Facts: May 11–14 2013 Liverpool Obesity Facts
  4. [30]Newlands R. PhD Thesis: Design and outcomes of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of lifestyle weight loss intervention in women treated for breast cancer: University of Aberdeen; 2016.
  5. [31]NICE Obesity: the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children 2006 22497033
  6. [39]The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Obesity: the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. 2006. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg189/evidence/obesity-update-appendix-m-pdf-6960327447. Assessed 5 June 2017. 22497033
  7. [60]Lieblich A, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T. Applied social research methods, Vol. 47. Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newlands, R. S. N., Ntessalen, M., Clark, J., Fielding, S., Hoddinott, P., Heys, S. D., McNeill, G., & Craig, L. C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • NHS Grampian (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Newlands, Rumana S. N.
Venue
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2019-02-13
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
24-24
ISSN
2055-5784 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913871627
Cited by
7
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division
  • Scottish Government
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200268)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K025643/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, weight loss, obesity, Weight Watchers, weight management interventions, quality of life, feasibility, weight loss maintenance, dietetic support, cancer recurrence risk, intervention costs, breast cancer patients, weight loss sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review