Cited by 285Diet and metabolism studiesObesity, Physical Activity, DietPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Randomised controlled trial of four commercial weight loss programmes in the UK: initial findings from the BBC “diet trials”

Open access
Truby, Helen, Baic, Sue, deLooy, Anne, Fox, Kenneth R, Livingstone, M Barbara E, Logan, Catherine M, Macdonald, Ian A, Morgan, Linda M +2 more·2006·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of four commercial weight loss diets available to adults in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Six month multicentre randomised unblinded controlled trial. SETTING: Community based sample of otherwise healthy overweight and obese adults. INTERVENTIONS: Dr Atkins' new diet revolution, Slim-Fast plan, Weight Watchers pure points programme, and Rosemary Conley's eat yourself slim diet and fitness plan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight and body fat changes over six months. RESULTS: All diets resulted in significant loss of body fat and weight over six months. Groups did not differ significantly but loss of body fat and weight was greater in all groups compared with the control group. In an intention to treat analysis, average weight loss was 5.9 kg and average fat loss was 4.4 kg over six months. The Atkins diet resulted in significantly higher weight loss during the first four weeks, but by the end was no more or less effective than the other diets. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically useful weight loss and fat loss can be achieved in adults who are motivated to follow commercial diets for a substantial period. Given the limited resources for weight management in the NHS, healthcare practitioners should discuss with their patients programmes known to be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT00327821.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38833.411204.80

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Freedman M, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: a scientific review. Obes Res 2001;9(suppl 1):1-40.
  2. Newman D. Cystatin C. Ann Clin Biochem 2002;39:89-104.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Truby, H., Baic, S., deLooy, A., Fox, K. R., Livingstone, M. B. E., Logan, C. M., Macdonald, I. A., Morgan, L. M., Taylor, M. A., & Millward, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Truby, Helen
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
332
Issue
7553
Pages
1309-1314
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2157932996
Cited by
284
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
weight loss diet, obesity, overweight adults, fat loss, Atkins diet, Weight Watchers, weight management
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Diet, Reducing, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Heart Diseases, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Television, Weight Loss, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review