The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing
Open accessAbstract
Background: The worldwide demand for the organ replacement or tissue regeneration is increasing steadily. The advancements in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have made it possible to regenerate such damaged organs or tissues into functional organ or tissue with the help of 3D bioprinting. The main component of the 3D bioprinting is the bioink, which is crucial for the development of functional organs or tissue structures. The bioinks used in 3D printing technology require so many properties which are vital and need to be considered during the selection. Combination of different methods and enhancements in properties are required to develop more successful bioinks for the 3D printing of organs or tissue structures. Main body: This review consists of the recent state-of-art of polymer-based bioinks used in 3D printing for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The subsection projects the basic requirements for the selection of successful bioinks for 3D printing and developing 3D tissues or organ structures using combinations of bioinks such as cells, biomedical polymers and biosignals. Different bioink materials and their properties related to the biocompatibility, printability, mechanical properties, which are recently reported for 3D printing are discussed in detail. Conclusion: Many bioinks formulations have been reported from cell-biomaterials based bioinks to cell-based bioinks such as cell aggregates and tissue spheroids for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Interestingly, more tunable bioinks, which are biocompatible for live cells, printable and mechanically stable after printing are emerging with the help of functional polymeric biomaterials, their modifications and blending of cells and hydrogels. These approaches show the immense potential of these bioinks to produce more complex tissue/organ structures using 3D bioprinting in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034
A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity
Kang, H.-W., Lee, S. J., Ko, I. K., Kengla, C., Yoo, J. J., & Atala, A. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3413 · Cited by 2,622
Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications
Burdick, J. A., & Prestwich, G. D. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201003963 · Cited by 2,139
Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink
Pati, F., Jang, J., Ha, D.-H., Won Kim, S., Rhie, J.-W., Shim, J.-H., Kim, D.-H., & Cho, D.-W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4935 · Cited by 1,904
Markstedt, K., Mantas, A., Tournier, I., Martínez Ávila, H., Hägg, D., & Gatenholm, P. (2015) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 · Cited by 1,528
Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering
Mironov, V., Boland, T., Trusk, T., Forgacs, G., & Markwald, R. R. (2003) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(03)00033-7 · Cited by 1,276
The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials
Hospodiuk, M., Dey, M., Sosnoski, D., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2017) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 · Cited by 1,118
Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting
Hölzl, K., Lin, S., Tytgat, L., Van Vlierberghe, S., Gu, L., & Ovsianikov, A. (2016) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 · Cited by 1,070
Billiet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., Cornelissen, M., & Dubruel, P. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 · Cited by 1,015
3D Bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels
Duan, B., Hockaday, L. A., Kang, K. H., & Butcher, J. T. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34420 · Cited by 1,002
Cited by
Pagac, M., Hajnys, J., Ma, Q.-P., Jancar, L., Jansa, J., Stefek, P., & Mesicek, J. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13040598 · Cited by 834
Alginate hydrogels for bone tissue engineering, from injectables to bioprinting: A review
Hernández-González, A. C., Téllez-Jurado, L., & Rodríguez-Lorenzo, L. M. (2020) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115514 · Cited by 549
Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs
Ashammakhi, N., Ahadian, S., Xu, C., Montazerian, H., Ko, H., Nasiri, R., Barros, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2019) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100008 · Cited by 549
Nicolas, J., Magli, S., Rabbachin, L., Sampaolesi, S., Nicotra, F., & Russo, L. (2020) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00045 · Cited by 509
Carboxymethyl cellulose-based materials for infection control and wound healing: A review
Kanikireddy, V., Varaprasad, K., Jayaramudu, T., Karthikeyan, C., & Sadiku, R. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.160 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Gopinathan, J., & Noh, I.
- Venue
- Biomaterials Research
- Published
- 2018-04-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1226-4601 (ISSN-L)
- 2055-7124
- OpenAlex
- W2797163462
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 123
- FWCI
- 31.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1
- The paper
- Gopinathan, J., & Noh, I. (2018). Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomaterials Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.