CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 552Blockchain Technology Applications and SecuritySharing Economy and PlatformsSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities

Open access
Sun, Jianjun, Yan, Jiaqi, Zhang, Kem Z. K.·2016·Financial Innovation
DOI 10.1186/s40854-016-0040-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The notion of smart city has grown popular over the past few years. It embraces several dimensions depending on the meaning of the word “smart” and benefits from innovative applications of new kinds of information and communications technology to support communal sharing. By relying on prior literature, this paper proposes a conceptual framework with three dimensions: (1) human, (2) technology, and (3) organization, and explores a set of fundamental factors that make a city smart from a sharing economy perspective. Using this triangle framework, we discuss what emerging blockchain technology may contribute to these factors and how its elements can help smart cities develop sharing services. This study discusses how blockchain-based sharing services can contribute to smart cities based on a conceptual framework. We hope it can stimulate interest in theory and practice to foster discussions in this area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40854-016-0040-y

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Agyeman J, McLaren D (2014) ‘Smart Cities’ Should Mean ‘Sharing Cities’. In: Times
  2. Economist (2013) The rise of the sharing economy, The Economist
  3. Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harv Bus Rev 84(10):92
  4. Giffinger R, Pichler-Milanović N (2007) Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities, Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology
  5. IBM (2015) Device democracy: Saving the future of the Internet of Things., http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/internetofthings/
  6. Larsen K (1999) Learning cities: the new recipe in regional development, vol 217/218, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD Observer., p 73
  7. Morrison A (2016) Blockchain and smart contract automation: How smart contracts automate digital business., http://www.pwc.com/us/en/technology-forecast/blockchain/digital-business.html
  8. Ranchordás S (2015) Does sharing mean caring: Regulating innovation in the sharing economy. Minn JL Sci Tech 16:413
  9. SpendMatters (2015) Why Bitcoin’s Blockchain Technology Could Revolutionize Supply Chain Transparency. In: Spend Matters., http://spendmatters.com/2015/11/09/why-bitcoins-blockchain-technology-could-revolutionize-supply-chain-transparency/
  10. Sundararajan A (2014) Peer-to-peer businesses and the sharing (collaborative) economy: Overview, economic effects and regulatory issues, Written testimony for the hearing titled The Power of Connection: Peer to Peer Businesses, January
  11. Washburn D, Sindhu U, Balaouras S, Dines R, Hayes N, Nelson L (2009) Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives. Growth 17(2):1–15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 550

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sun, J., Yan, J., & Zhang, K. Z. K.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Yan, Jiaqi
ORCID
Venue
Financial Innovation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-12
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2199-4730 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s40854-016-0040-y
OpenAlex
W2561905839
Cited by
552
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
108.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Financial Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Jiangsu Social Science Research Foundation (12DDB012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
blockchain, smart cities, sharing economy, sharing services, conceptual framework, communal sharing, urban development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review