Cited by 143FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceMicrofinance and Financial InclusionDigital Transformation in Financial Services

Financial inclusion and fintech: a state-of-the-art systematic literature review

Open access
Ha, Dao, Le, Phuong, Nguyen, Duc Khuong·2025·Financial Innovation

Abstract

This study presents an all-inclusive analysis of the literature on the augmentation of financial inclusion through fintech. Ninety-six papers were selected from the 2951 articles in the Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO databases. This study uses bibliometric and content analysis techniques to illuminate the underexplored aspects of fintech’s impact on financial inclusion. Unlike previous studies, this study consolidates a significant amount of the literature on financial inclusion by systematically contextualizing theories and viewpoints from the fintech sector. The key findings include the identification of three main research clusters: (1) the advent of novel services, (2) the transformation of the market landscape, and (3) the roles of stakeholders in the fintech ecosystem. The analysis reveals gaps in the existing research, such as the need for more studies on the tangible impact of fintech on financial inclusion and regulation. This study concludes by highlighting potential directions for future research and emphasizing the importance of policymakers paying greater attention to fintech’s implications for financial inclusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40854-024-00741-0

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 161 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ha, D., Le, P., & Nguyen, D. K.
Affiliations
  • Ho Chi Minh University of Banking (VN)
  • Prague University of Economics and Business (CZ)
Corresponding author
Le, Phuong
Venue
Financial Innovation
Published
2025-01-27
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2199-4730 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406829529
Cited by
110
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 40
FWCI
48.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Financial Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Grantová Agentura České Republiky (GA24-10008S)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
Keywords
financial inclusion, fintech, fintech services, financial market transformation, fintech regulation, financial inclusion policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review