Neo-colonial credit: FinTech platforms in Africa
Open accessAbstract
This paper makes a three-fold contribution to social science research into FinTech in Africa. First, we build on existing research into mobile payments to show how FinTech providers offer unsecured short-term credit products via mobile wallets. Second, we stress how the expansion of Africa’s FinTech economy is constituted through the distinctive platformization processes of platform capitalism. Third, we develop current work that highlights how the growth of FinTech in Africa rests on historically specific and geographically uneven conditions of racialized marginalization rooted in colonial legacies, and argue that FinTech is renewing and recasting colonial relations in the present. We show how FinTech platforms are assembled through neo-colonial corporate telecommunication, digital and data infrastructures that enrol differentiated populations previously excluded from formal financial relations under colonial regimes. Platforms are also revealed to extol a version of the modernizing and civilizing mission of the enlightened empowerment of individuals whilst simultaneously extracting rents through racialized expropriations. Illustration is provided throughout by in-depth case analysis of JUMO, a Cape Town-based FinTech firm that currently operates across six African countries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Promises of leapfrogging into web3 or new platforms recapitulate the cultural imperialist notion that African enlightenment and modernity are contingent upon adapting Western economic and techno-rationales.
“Promises of ' leapfrogging ' into web3 or new platforms recapitulates the cultural imperialist notion that African enlightenment and modernity are contingent upon adapting Western economic and techno-rationales (Langley and Leyshon, 2022).”
From Blockchain financialization, neo-colonialism, and Binance (2023) · cites this paper as Langley and Leyshon, 2022
Cites
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317 · see citing works
Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476418796632 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South
Kwet, M. (2019) · Race & Class · doi:10.1177/0306396818823172 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Mobile Money: Communication, Consumption and Change in the Payments Space
Maurer, B. (2012) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2011.621944 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Financial inclusion and fintech: a state-of-the-art systematic literature review
Ha, D., Le, P., & Nguyen, D. K. (2025) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-024-00741-0 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“These concerns highlight the need for a balanced understanding of fintech’s role in fostering inclusion, especially in the Global South, where inequalities can be maintained (Langley and Leyshon 2022; Akolgo 2023).”
Blockchain financialization, neo-colonialism, and Binance
Jutel, O. (2023) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2023.1160257 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Langley, P., & Leyshon, A.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Langley, Paul
- Venue
- Journal of Cultural Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-02-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401-415
- ISSN
- 1753-0350 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-0369
- OpenAlex
- W4293010647
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cultural Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Keywords
- fintech, neocolonialism, colonial legacy, mobile payment, mobile wallets, short-term credit, platform capitalism, platformization, data infrastructure, digital infrastructure, financial exclusion, civilizing mission, modernization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review