Cited by 84FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismDigital Economy and Work Transformation

Neo-colonial credit: FinTech platforms in Africa

Open access
Langley, Paul, Leyshon, Andrew·2022·Journal of Cultural Economy

Abstract

This paper makes a three-fold contribution to social science research into FinTech in Africa. First, we build on existing research into mobile payments to show how FinTech providers offer unsecured short-term credit products via mobile wallets. Second, we stress how the expansion of Africa’s FinTech economy is constituted through the distinctive platformization processes of platform capitalism. Third, we develop current work that highlights how the growth of FinTech in Africa rests on historically specific and geographically uneven conditions of racialized marginalization rooted in colonial legacies, and argue that FinTech is renewing and recasting colonial relations in the present. We show how FinTech platforms are assembled through neo-colonial corporate telecommunication, digital and data infrastructures that enrol differentiated populations previously excluded from formal financial relations under colonial regimes. Platforms are also revealed to extol a version of the modernizing and civilizing mission of the enlightened empowerment of individuals whilst simultaneously extracting rents through racialized expropriations. Illustration is provided throughout by in-depth case analysis of JUMO, a Cape Town-based FinTech firm that currently operates across six African countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17530350.2022.2028652

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promises of leapfrogging into web3 or new platforms recapitulate the cultural imperialist notion that African enlightenment and modernity are contingent upon adapting Western economic and techno-rationales.

    “Promises of ' leapfrogging ' into web3 or new platforms recapitulates the cultural imperialist notion that African enlightenment and modernity are contingent upon adapting Western economic and techno-rationales (Langley and Leyshon, 2022).”

    From Blockchain financialization, neo-colonialism, and Binance (2023) · cites this paper as Langley and Leyshon, 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Langley, Paul
Venue
Journal of Cultural Economy
Published
2022-02-22
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
401-415
ISSN
  • 1753-0350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0369
OpenAlex
W4293010647
Cited by
84
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4
FWCI
14.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cultural Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Keywords
fintech, neocolonialism, colonial legacy, mobile payment, mobile wallets, short-term credit, platform capitalism, platformization, data infrastructure, digital infrastructure, financial exclusion, civilizing mission, modernization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review