Cited by 79Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesMigration, Racism, and Human Rights

How do refugees affect social life in host communities? The case of Congolese refugees in Rwanda

Open access
Fajth, Veronika, Bilgili, Özge, Loschmann, Craig, Siegel, Melissa·2019·Comparative Migration Studies

Abstract

This paper investigates how social dimensions of life in local communities are affected by the long-term presence of Congolese refugees in Rwanda, paying particular attention to feelings of safety, social networks and trust. To gauge whether increased probability of interaction with refugees reduces cohesion, these outcomes are compared across local households at varying distances from a refugee camp. This paper is based on mixed methods approach including new data originating from a household survey conducted in host communities surrounding three refugee camps, as well as information from focus group discussions. The quantitative analysis shows no statistically significant differences between host communities with the exception of informal social networks, which are higher in communities closer to refugee camps. However, qualitative evidence illustrates how greater (economic) interaction between the two populations helps increase trust between refugees and host communities over time. Moreover, locals argue that economic and social support given to refugees plays a key role in reducing and preventing conflict between the two groups. These findings map the experiences and give voice to host communities’ perspectives on social life in their community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40878-019-0139-1

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies indicate that incorporating refugees' resilience and community involvement into humanitarian organizations' programs may produce a more effective mental health treatment modality within these low-threshold support systems.

    “Studies indicate that incorporating refugees' resilience and community involvement into humanitarian organizations' programs may produce a more effective mental health treatment modality within these lowthreshold support systems (Fajth 2019).”

    From Exploring trauma and resilience of Urban South Sudanese refugees in Sudan (2024) · cites this paper as Fajth 2019

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) recommends greater social interaction between refugees and local communities and continued organizational support. It does not discuss refugees’ resilience, mental health treatment, or whether community involvement improves treatment in low-threshold support systems. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Easton-Calabria, E., & Lindsay, A. (2013). Towards durable solutions for protracted Congolese refugees in Rwanda. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, 3(2), 58-66.
  2. Whitaker, E. (1999). Changing opportunities: refugees and host communities in western Tanzania (Working Paper No. 11), (pp. 1- 17). UNHCR. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/3ae6a0c70.pdf.
  3. Whitaker, E. (2002). New issues in refugee research. UNHCR, (pp. 1-17). Washington, DC: United Nations.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fajth, V., Bilgili, Ö., Loschmann, C., & Siegel, M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Bilgili, Özge
Venue
Comparative Migration Studies
Published
2019-08-06
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2214-594X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966029048
Cited by
79
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comparative Migration Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Noda Institute for Scientific Research
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
  • Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, United Nations University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
  • Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Keywords
Congolese refugees, refugee camps, host communities, social networks, trust, sense of security, community cohesion, intergroup relations, economic interaction, social support, conflict prevention, Rwanda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review