The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer
Open accessAbstract
China is one of the countries with the highest incidence of gastric cancer. There are differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biological characteristics, treatment patterns, and drug selection between gastric cancer patients from the Eastern and Western countries. Non‐Chinese guidelines cannot specifically reflect the diagnosis and treatment characteristics for the Chinese gastric cancer patients. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) arranged for a panel of senior experts specializing in all sub‐specialties of gastric cancer to compile, discuss, and revise the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer based on the findings of evidence‐based medicine in China and abroad. By referring to the opinions of industry experts, taking into account of regional differences, giving full consideration to the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment resources, these experts have conducted experts’ consensus judgement on relevant evidence and made various grades of recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer to reflect the value of cancer treatment and meeting health economic indexes. This guideline uses tables and is complemented by explanatory and descriptive notes covering the diagnosis, comprehensive treatment, and follow‐up visits for gastric cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade
Le, D. T., Durham, J. N., Smith, K. N., Wang, H., Bartlett, B. R., Aulakh, L. K., Lu, S., Kemberling, H., Wilt, C., Luber, B. S., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6733 · Cited by 6,645
Hellman, S., & Weichselbaum, R. R. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1995.13.1.8 · Cited by 2,562
iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics
Seymour, L., Bogaerts, J., Perrone, A., Ford, R., Schwartz, L. H., Mandrekar, S., Lin, N. U., Litière, S., Dancey, J., Chen, A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30074-8 · Cited by 2,472
Fuchs, C. S., Doi, T., Jang, R. W., Muro, K., Satoh, T., Machado, M., Sun, W., Jalal, S. I., Shah, M. A., Metges, J.-P., et al. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0013 · Cited by 1,784
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., Giardiello, F. M., Hampel, H. L., & Burt, R. W. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.435 · Cited by 1,662
Bauer, J., Capra, S., & Ferguson, M. (2002) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601412 · Cited by 1,178
Wagner, A. D., Grothe, W., Haerting, J., Kleber, G., Grothey, A., & Fleig, W. E. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.0245 · Cited by 1,171 · cited 2×
“• For patients who can tolerate chemotherapy, it has been observed that, as compared with best supportive care, chemotherapy can prolong the survival of metastatic gastric cancer patients [91].”
BackgroundJiang, Y., Jin, C., Yu, H., Wu, J., Chen, C., Yuan, Q., Huang, W., Hu, Y., Xu, Y., Zhou, Z., et al. (2021) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003778 · Cited by 169
Self-citation
Cited by
Shah, M. A., Shitara, K., Ajani, J. A., Bang, Y.-J., Enzinger, P., Ilson, D., Lordick, F., Van Cutsem, E., Gallego Plazas, J., Huang, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02465-7 · Cited by 681
Self-citationWang, F., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Tang, L., Qu, X., Ying, J., Zhang, J., Sun, L., Lin, R., Qiu, H., et al. (2021) · Cancer Communications · doi:10.1002/cac2.12193 · Cited by 624
Self-citationWang, F., Wei, X. L., Wang, F. H., Xu, N., Shen, L., Dai, G. H., Yuan, X. L., Chen, Y., Yang, S. J., Shi, J. H., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz197 · Cited by 455
Self-citationSignaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer
Lei, Z.-N., Teng, Q.-X., Tian, Q., Chen, W., Xie, Y., Wu, K., Zeng, Q., Zeng, L., Pan, Y., Chen, Z.-S., et al. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01190-w · Cited by 322
Prognostic significance and immune characteristics of GPR27 in gastric cancer
Pan, J., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.205023 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., Shen, L., Li, J., Zhou, Z., Liang, H., Zhang, X., Tang, L., Xin, Y., Jin, J., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Liu, T., Li, G., Wu, Q., Xu, H., Ji, J., Li, Y., Wang, X., Yu, S., Liu, H., Guan, W., & Xu, R.
- Venue
- Cancer Communications
- Published
- 2019-03-18
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 1000-467X (ISSN-L)
- 2523-3548
- OpenAlex
- W2935936692
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 68.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40880-019-0349-9
- The paper
- Wang, F., Shen, L., Li, J., Zhou, Z., Liang, H., Zhang, X., Tang, L., Xin, Y., Jin, J., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Liu, T., Li, G., Wu, Q., Xu, H., Ji, J., Li, Y., Wang, X., Yu, S., . . . Xu, R. (2019). The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Cancer Communications. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0349-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
