Cited by 48Radiology practices and educationVisual perception and processing mechanismsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

What do we know about volumetric medical image interpretation?: a review of the basic science and medical image perception literatures

Open access
Williams, Lauren H., Drew, Trafton·2019·Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Abstract

Interpretation of volumetric medical images represents a rapidly growing proportion of the workload in radiology. However, relatively little is known about the strategies that best guide search behavior when looking for abnormalities in volumetric images. Although there is extensive literature on two-dimensional medical image perception, it is an open question whether the conclusions drawn from these images can be generalized to volumetric images. Importantly, volumetric images have distinct characteristics (e.g., scrolling through depth, smooth-pursuit eye-movements, motion onset cues, etc.) that should be considered in future research. In this manuscript, we will review the literature on medical image perception and discuss relevant findings from basic science that can be used to generate predictions about expertise in volumetric image interpretation. By better understanding search through volumetric images, we may be able to identify common sources of error, characterize the optimal strategies for searching through depth, or develop new training and assessment techniques for radiology residents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41235-019-0171-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human memory for already sampled locations is poor, resulting in less efficient and defective search behavior.

    “However, human memory for already sampled locations proved to be poor, resulting in both less efficient and defective search behavior: less efficient because they may look multiple times at the same location, defective because they may miss a significant proportion of the image [19 , 21 , 22] .”

    From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    In “What are the consequences of limited memory in volumetric image search?” (page unavailable), the review describes poor memory for previously visited locations and suggests that forgetting could lead radiologists to revisit locations or resume searching inaccurately. It presents those effects as possibilities, not proven consequences, and does not establish that poor memory causes searchers to miss a significant proportion of an image. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 213

  1. Abrams RA Christ SE Motion onset captures attention Psychological Science 2003 14 5 427 432 10.1111/1467-9280.01458 12930472 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Adamo SH Ericson JM Nah JC Brem R Mitroff SR Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2018 3 1 17 29963605 PMC5999688
  3. Aizenman A Drew T Ehinger KA Georgian-Smith D Wolfe JM Comparing search patterns in digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography: an eye tracking study Journal of Medical Imaging 2017 4 4 045501 29098168 PMC5658515
  4. Alakhras MM Brennan PC Rickard M Bourne R Mello-Thoms C Effect of radiologists’ experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis European Radiology 2015 25 2 402 409 10.1007/s00330-014-3409-1 25192796 · DOI
  5. Andersson I Ikeda DM Zackrisson S Ruschin M Svahn T Timberg P Tingberg A Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings European Radiology 2008 18 12 2817 2825 10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9 18641998 · DOI
  6. Andia ME Plett J Tejos C Guarini MW Navarro ME Razmilic D Enhancement of visual perception with use of dynamic cues Radiology 2009 250 2 551 557 10.1148/radiol.2502080168 19188323 · DOI
  7. Andrews TJ Coppola DM Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments Vision Research 1999 39 17 2947 2953 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00019-X 10492820 · DOI
  8. Andriole KP Wolfe JM Khorasani R Treves ST Getty DJ Jacobson FL Optimizing analysis, visualization, and navigation of large image data sets: one 5000-section CT scan can ruin your whole day Radiology 2011 259 2 346 362 10.1148/radiol.11091276 21502391 PMC6939959 · DOI
  9. Annac E Manginelli AA Pollmann S Shi Z Müller HJ Geyer T Memory under pressure: secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search Journal of Vision 2013 13 13 6 6 10.1167/13.13.6 24190911 · DOI
  10. Ballard DH Hayhoe MM Pelz JB Memory representations in natural tasks Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1995 7 1 66 80 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66 23961754 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bays PM Husain M Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes Journal of Vision 2012 12 8 8 8 10.1167/12.8.8 22895881 PMC3587005 · DOI
  12. Beck MR Martin BA Smitherman E Gaschen L Eyes-on training and radiological expertise: an examination of expertise development and its effects on visual working memory Human Factors 2013 55 4 747 763 10.1177/0018720812469224 23964415 · DOI
  13. Berbaum K Franken EA Jr Caldwell RT Schartz KM Can a checklist reduce SOS errors in chest radiography? Academic Radiology 2006 13 3 296 304 10.1016/j.acra.2005.11.032 16488841 · DOI
  14. Berbaum KS Franken JE Dorfman DD Rooholamini SA Coffman CE Cornell SH Time course of satisfaction of search Investigative Radiology 1991 26 7 640 648 10.1097/00004424-199107000-00003 1885270 · DOI
  15. Berbaum KS Franken JE Dorfman DD Rooholamini SA Kathol MH Barloon TJ Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology Investigative Radiology 1990 25 2 133 140 10.1097/00004424-199002000-00006 2312249 · DOI
  16. Bertram R Helle L Kaakinen JK Svedström E The effect of expertise on eye movement behaviour in medical image perception PLoS One 2013 8 6 e66169 10.1371/journal.pone.0066169 23785481 PMC3681771 · DOI
  17. Bertram R Kaakinen J Bensch F Helle L Lantto E Niemi P Lundbom N Eye movements of radiologists reflect expertise in CT study interpretation: a potential tool to measure resident development Radiology 2016 281 3 805 815 10.1148/radiol.2016151255 27409563 · DOI
  18. Bink A Benner J Reinhardt J Vere-Tyndall D Stieltjes B Hainc N Stippich C Structured reporting in neuroradiology: intracranial tumors Frontiers in Neurology 2018 9 32 10.3389/fneur.2018.00032 29467712 PMC5808104 · DOI
  19. Blanchon T Bréchot JM Grenier PA Ferretti GR Lemarié E Milleron B Baseline results of the Depiscan study: a French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR) Lung Cancer 2007 58 1 50 58 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.05.009 17624475 · DOI
  20. Brockmole JR Henderson JM Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005 12 6 1061 1067 10.3758/BF03206444 16615329 · DOI
  21. Brunyé TT Eddy MD Mercan E Allison KH Weaver DL Elmore JG Pupil diameter changes reflect difficulty and diagnostic accuracy during medical image interpretation BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2016 16 1 77 10.1186/s12911-016-0322-3 27378371 PMC4932753 · DOI
  22. Cain MS Adamo SH Mitroff SR A taxonomy of errors in multiple-target visual search Visual Cognition 2013 21 7 899 921 10.1080/13506285.2013.843627 · DOI
  23. Cain MS Mitroff SR Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2013 39 5 1398 1408 23163788
  24. Cain MS Vul E Clark K Mitroff SR A Bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search Psychological Science 2012 23 9 1047 1054 10.1177/0956797612440460 22868494 · DOI
  25. Carmody DP Nodine CF Kundel HL Finding lung nodules with and without comparative visual scanning Perception & Psychophysics 1981 29 6 594 598 10.3758/BF03207377 7279589 · DOI
  26. Carrigan AJ Wardle SG Rich AN Finding cancer in mammograms: if you know it’s there, do you know where? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2018 3 1 10 29707615 PMC5904219
  27. Castelhano MS Henderson JM Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007 33 4 753 763 17683226
  28. Charnov EL Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem Theoretical Population Biology 1976 9 2 129 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-X 1273796 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Chen W HolcDorf D McCusker MW Gaillard F Howe PD Perceptual training to improve hip fracture identification in conventional radiographs PLoS One 2017 12 12 e0189192 10.1371/journal.pone.0189192 29267344 PMC5739398 · DOI
  30. Chen X Zelinsky GJ Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance Vision Research 2006 46 24 4118 4133 10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.008 17005231 · DOI
  31. Christensen EE Murry RC Holland K Reynolds J Landay MJ Moore JG The effect of search time on perception Radiology 1981 138 2 361 365 10.1148/radiology.138.2.7455116 7455116 · DOI
  32. Chun MM Jiang Y Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention Cognitive Psychology 1998 36 1 28 71 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681 9679076 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Chun MM Jiang Y Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation Psychological Science 1999 10 4 360 365 10.1111/1467-9280.00168 · DOI
  34. Ciatto S Houssami N Bernardi D Caumo F Pellegrini M Brunelli S Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study The Lancet Oncology 2013 14 7 583 589 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7 23623721 · DOI
  35. Clarke AD Mahon A Irvine A Hunt AR People are unable to recognize or report on their own eye movements The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2017 70 11 2251 2270 10.1080/17470218.2016.1231208 27595318 · DOI
  36. Cooper, L., Gale, A., Darker, I., Toms, A., & Saada, J. (2009). Radiology image perception and observer performance: How does expertise and clinical information alter interpretation? Stroke detection explored through eye-tracking. Proceedings of SPIE 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 72630K. 10.1117/12.811098. · DOI
  37. Cooper, L., Gale, A., Saada, J., Gedela, S., Scott, H., & Toms, A. (2010). The assessment of stroke multidimensional CT and MR imaging using eye movement analysis: Does modality preference enhance observer performance? Proceedings of SPIE 7627, Medical Imaging 2010: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 76270B, 10.1117/12.843680. · DOI
  38. Corbett JE Munneke J “It’s not a tumor”: a framework for capitalizing on individual diversity to boost target detection Psychological Science 2018 29 10 1692 1705 10.1177/0956797618784887 30188806 · DOI
  39. Cowan N The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001 24 1 87 114 10.1017/S0140525X01003922 11515286 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Crowe EM Gilchrist ID Kent C New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2018 3 1 14 29721518 PMC5915515
  41. Diaz I Schmidt S Verdun FR Bochud FO Eye-tracking of nodule detection in lung CT volumetric data Medical Physics 2015 42 6 2925 2932 10.1118/1.4919849 26127046 · DOI
  42. Dickinson CA Zelinsky GJ Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history Vision Research 2007 47 13 1745 1755 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.010 17482657 PMC2129092 · DOI
  43. Donovan T Litchfield D Looking for cancer: expertise related differences in searching and decision making Applied Cognitive Psychology 2013 27 1 43 49 10.1002/acp.2869 · DOI
  44. Drew T Boettcher SEP Wolfe JM One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search Journal of Vision 2017 17 11 5 10.1167/17.11.5 28892812 PMC5596794 · DOI
  45. Drew T Evans K Võ MLH Jacobson FL Wolfe JM Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images? Radiographics 2013 33 1 263 274 10.1148/rg.331125023 23104971 PMC3545617 · DOI
  46. Drew T Võ MLH Olwal A Jacobson F Seltzer SE Wolfe JM Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images Journal of Vision 2013 13 10 3 10.1167/13.10.3 23922445 PMC3736761 · DOI
  47. Drew T Võ MLH Wolfe JM The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers Psychological Science 2013 24 9 1848 1853 10.1177/0956797613479386 23863753 PMC3964612 · DOI
  48. Drew T Williams LH Aldred B Heilbrun ME Minoshima S Quantifying the costs of interruption during diagnostic radiology interpretation using mobile eye-tracking glasses Journal of Medical Imaging 2018 5 3 031406 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.031406 29531970 PMC5833804 · DOI
  49. Droll JA Hayhoe MM Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007 33 6 1352 1365 18085948
  50. Ebner L Tall M Choudhury KR Ly DL Roos JE Napel S Rubin GD Variations in the functional visual field for detection of lung nodules on chest computed tomography: impact of nodule size, distance, and local lung complexity Medical Physics 2017 44 7 3483 3490 10.1002/mp.12277 28419484 · DOI
  51. Ericson JM Kravitz DJ Mitroff SR Visual search: you are who you are (+ a learning curve) Perception 2017 46 12 1434 1441 10.1177/0301006617721091 28708026 · DOI
  52. Evans KK Birdwell RL Wolfe JM If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening PLoS One 2013 8 5 e64366 10.1371/journal.pone.0064366 23737980 PMC3667799 · DOI
  53. Evans KK Cohen MA Tambouret R Horowitz T Kreindel E Wolfe JM Does visual expertise improve visual recognition memory? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2011 73 1 30 35 10.3758/s13414-010-0022-5 PMC3140200 21258906 · DOI
  54. Evans KK Georgian-Smith D Tambouret R Birdwell RL Wolfe JM The gist of the abnormal: above-chance medical decision making in the blink of an eye Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2013 20 6 1170 1175 10.3758/s13423-013-0459-3 23771399 PMC3851597 · DOI
  55. Findlay JM Brown V Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I. Scanpath planning Vision Research 2006 46 1–2 179 195 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.010 16054669 · DOI
  56. Foulsham T Kingstone A Where have eye been? Observers can recognise their own fixations Perception 2013 42 10 1085 1089 10.1068/p7562 24494439 · DOI
  57. Foulsham T Kingstone A Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013 142 1 41 56 10.1037/a0028227 22506754 · DOI
  58. Gegenfurtner A Lehtinen E Jarodzka H Säljö R Effects of eye movement modeling examples on adaptive expertise in medical image diagnosis Computers & Education 2017 113 212 225 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.001 · DOI
  59. Gegenfurtner A Lehtinen E Säljö R Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains Educational Psychology Review 2011 23 4 523 552 10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Gennaro G Toledano A Di Maggio C Baldan E Bezzon E La Grassa M Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study European Radiology 2010 20 7 1545 1553 10.1007/s00330-009-1699-5 20033175 · DOI
  61. Geyer T Von Mühlenen A Müller HJ What do eye movements reveal about the role of memory in visual search? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007 60 7 924 935 10.1080/17470210600831119 17616911 · DOI
  62. Gilchrist ID Harvey M Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search Visual Cognition 2006 14 4–8 704 715 10.1080/13506280500193719 · DOI
  63. Gilchrist ID North A Hood B Is visual search really like foraging? Perception 2001 30 12 1459 1464 10.1068/p3249 11817753 · DOI
  64. Girelli M Luck SJ Are the same attentional mechanisms used to detect visual search targets defined by color, orientation, and motion? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997 9 2 238 253 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.238 23962014 · DOI
  65. Godwin HJ Benson V Drieghe D Using interrupted visual displays to explore the capacity, time course, and format of fixation plans during visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2013 39 6 1700 1712 23528001
  66. Gur D Abrams GS Chough DM Ganott MA Hakim CM Perrin RL Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study American Journal of Roentgenology 2009 193 2 586 591 10.2214/AJR.08.2031 19620460 · DOI
  67. Hansen K Nielsen M Ewertsen C Ultrasonography of the kidney: a pictorial review Diagnostics 2016 6 1 2 10.3390/diagnostics6010002 PMC4808817 26838799 · DOI
  68. Hayes TR Henderson JM Scan patterns during real-world scene viewing predict individual differences in cognitive capacity Journal of Vision 2017 17 5 23 23 10.1167/17.5.23 28564687 · DOI
  69. Hayhoe MM Shrivastava A Mruczek R Pelz JB Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task Journal of Vision 2003 3 1 6 6 10.1167/3.1.6 12678625 · DOI
  70. Helbren E Fanshawe TR Phillips P Mallett S Boone D Gale A The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography European Radiology 2015 25 6 1570 1578 10.1007/s00330-014-3569-z 25577518 · DOI
  71. Helbren E Halligan S Phillips P Boone D Fanshawe TR Taylor SA Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: a study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography The British Journal of Radiology 2014 87 1037 20130614 10.1259/bjr.20130614 24689842 PMC4075527 · DOI
  72. Henderson JM Luke SG Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2014 40 4 1390 24730735
  73. Hogeboom M van Leeuwen C Visual search strategy and perceptual organization covary with individual preference and structural complexity Acta Psychologica 1997 95 2 141 164 10.1016/S0001-6918(96)00049-2 9062062 · DOI
  74. Horowitz TS Wolfe JM Visual search has no memory Nature 1998 394 6693 575 10.1038/29068 9707117 · DOI
  75. Hout MC Goldinger SD Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2015 77 1 128 149 10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6 PMC4286498 25214306 · DOI
  76. Humphrey K Underwood G Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition British Journal of Psychology 2009 100 2 377 398 10.1348/000712608X344780 18822185 · DOI
  77. Jiang YV Won BY Swallow KM Mussack DM Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2014 40 4 1346 1357 24842066 PMC4122597
  78. Jonides J Yantis S Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention Perception & Psychophysics 1988 43 4 346 354 10.3758/BF03208805 3362663 · DOI
  79. Kahn CE Jr Heilbrun ME Applegate KE From guidelines to practice: how reporting templates promote the use of radiology practice guidelines Journal of the American College of Radiology 2013 10 4 268 273 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.025 23332496 PMC3615027 · DOI
  80. Kelahan, L. C., Fong, A., Blumenthal, J., Kandaswamy, S., Ratwani, R. M., & Filice, R. W. (2019). The Radiologist’s gaze: Mapping three-dimensional visual search in computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. Journal of Digital Imaging, 32(2), 234–240. PMC6456635 30291478
  81. Kelly B Rainford LA McEntee MF Kavanagh EC Influence of radiology expertise on the perception of nonmedical images Journal of Medical Imaging 2017 5 3 031402 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.031402 29250569 PMC5724551 · DOI
  82. Kelly BS Rainford LA Darcy SP Kavanagh EC Toomey RJ The development of expertise in radiology: In chest radiograph interpretation, “expert” search pattern may predate “expert” levels of diagnostic accuracy for pneumothorax identification Radiology 2016 280 1 252 260 10.1148/radiol.2016150409 27322975 · DOI
  83. Kit D Katz L Sullivan B Snyder K Ballard D Hayhoe M Eye movements, visual search and scene memory, in an immersive virtual environment PLoS One 2014 9 4 e94362 10.1371/journal.pone.0094362 24759905 PMC3997357 · DOI
  84. Klein RM MacInnes WJ Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search Psychological Science 1999 10 4 346 352 10.1111/1467-9280.00166 · DOI
  85. Koehler K Eckstein MP Beyond scene gist: objects guide search more than scene background Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2017 43 6 1177 1193 28287759
  86. Koide N Kubo T Nishida S Shibata T Ikeda K Art expertise reduces influence of visual salience on fixation in viewing abstract-paintings PLoS One 2015 10 2 e0117696 10.1371/journal.pone.0117696 25658327 PMC4319974 · DOI
  87. Kok EM Abed A Robben SG Does the use of a checklist help medical students in the detection of abnormalities on a chest radiograph? Journal of Digital Imaging 2017 30 6 726 731 10.1007/s10278-017-9979-0 28560508 PMC5681473 · DOI
  88. Kok EM De Bruin AB Robben SG van Merriënboer JJ Looking in the same manner but seeing it differently: bottom-up and expertise effects in radiology Applied Cognitive Psychology 2012 26 6 854 862 10.1002/acp.2886 · DOI
  89. Kok EM Jarodzka H de Bruin AB BinAmir HA Robben SG van Merriënboer JJ Systematic viewing in radiology: seeing more, missing less? Advances in Health Sciences Education 2016 21 1 189 205 10.1007/s10459-015-9624-y 26228704 PMC4749649 · DOI
  90. Kramer AF Martin-Emerson R Larish JF Andersen GJ Aging and filtering by movement in visual search The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 1996 51 4 P201 P216 10.1093/geronb/51B.4.P201 8673641 · DOI
  91. Kristjánsson A In search of remembrance: evidence for memory in visual search Psychological Science 2000 11 4 328 332 10.1111/1467-9280.00265 11273394 · DOI
  92. Krupinski EA Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety Academic Radiology 2005 12 8 965 969 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.071 16023379 · DOI
  93. Krupinski EA Berbaum KS Caldwell RT Schartz KM Madsen MT Kramer DJ Do long radiology workdays affect nodule detection in dynamic CT interpretation? Journal of the American College of Radiology 2012 9 3 191 198 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.11.013 22386166 PMC3296477 · DOI
  94. Krupinski EA Berger WG Dallas WJ Roehrig H Searching for nodules: what features attract attention and influence detection? Academic Radiology 2003 10 8 861 868 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00055-2 12945920 · DOI
  95. Krupinski EA Graham AR Weinstein RS Characterizing the development of visual search expertise in pathology residents viewing whole slide images Human Pathology 2013 44 3 357 364 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.05.024 22835956 · DOI
  96. Krupinski EA Tillack AA Richter L Henderson JT Bhattacharyya AK Scott KM Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides. Implications for medical education and differences with experience Human Pathology 2006 37 12 1543 1556 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.024 17129792 · DOI
  97. Kundel HL La Follette PS Jr Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images Radiology 1972 103 3 523 528 10.1148/103.3.523 5022947 · DOI
  98. Kundel HL Nodine CF Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search Radiology 1975 116 3 527 532 10.1148/116.3.527 125436 · DOI
  99. Kundel HL Nodine CF Carmody D Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection Investigative Radiology 1978 13 3 175 181 10.1097/00004424-197805000-00001 711391 · DOI
  100. Kundel HL Nodine CF Conant EF Weinstein SP Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study Radiology 2007 242 2 396 402 10.1148/radiol.2422051997 17255410 · DOI
  101. Kundel HL Nodine CF Krupinski EA Searching for lung nodules. Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions Investigative Radiology 1989 24 6 472 478 10.1097/00004424-198906000-00012 2521130 · DOI
  102. Kundel HL Nodine CF Krupinski EA Mello-Thoms C Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms Academic Radiology 2008 15 7 881 886 10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.023 18572124 · DOI
  103. Kundel HL Nodine CF Thickman D Toto L Searching for lung nodules. A comparison of human performance with random and systematic scanning models Investigative Radiology 1987 22 5 417 422 10.1097/00004424-198705000-00010 3597010 · DOI
  104. Lago, M. A., Abbey, C. K., Barufaldi, B., Bakic, P. R., Weinstein, S. P., Maidment, A. D., & Eckstein, M. P. (2018). Interactions of lesion detectability and size across single-slice DBT and 3D DBT. Proceedings of SPIE 10577, Medical Imaging 2018: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 105770X, 10.1117/12.2293873. PMC7237825 32435080 · DOI
  105. Lansdale M Underwood G Davies C Something overlooked? How experts in change detection use visual saliency Applied Cognitive Psychology 2010 24 2 213 225 10.1002/acp.1552 · DOI
  106. Leone MJ Fernandez Slezak D Cecchi GA Sigman M The geometry of expertise Frontiers in Psychology 2014 5 47 1 9 24550869 PMC3913042
  107. Leong DL Rainford L Haygood TM Whitman GJ Geiser WR Stephens TW Radiologist experience effects on contrast detection JOSA A 2014 31 11 2328 2333 10.1364/JOSAA.31.002328 25401342 · DOI
  108. Li CL Aivar MP Kit DM Tong MH Hayhoe MM Memory and visual search in naturalistic 2D and 3D environments Journal of Vision 2016 16 8 9 9 10.1167/16.8.9 27299769 PMC4913723 · DOI
  109. Lin E Powell DK Kagetsu NJ Efficacy of a checklist-style structured radiology reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine computed tomography examinations Journal of Digital Imaging 2014 27 5 588 593 10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2 24865860 PMC4171436 · DOI
  110. Litchfield D Ball LJ Donovan T Manning DJ Crawford T Viewing another person's eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2010 16 3 251 262 20853985
  111. Litchfield D Donovan T Worth a quick look? Initial scene previews can guide eye movements as a function of domain-specific expertise but can also have unforeseen costs Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2016 42 7 982 26784003
  112. Makovski T Jiang YV Contextual cost: when a visual-search target is not where it should be Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010 63 2 216 225 10.1080/17470210903281590 PMC2811535 20094943 · DOI
  113. Mallett S Phillips P Fanshawe TR Helbren E Boone D Gale A Tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal three-dimensional CT colonography: visual perception of experienced and inexperienced readers Radiology 2014 273 3 783 792 10.1148/radiol.14132896 25028782 · DOI
  114. Manginelli AA Langer N Klose D Pollmann S Contextual cueing under working memory load: selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2013 75 6 1103 1117 10.3758/s13414-013-0466-5 23636949 · DOI
  115. Manning D Barker-Mill SC Donovan T Crawford T Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection The British Journal of Radiology 2006 79 940 342 346 10.1259/bjr/13453920 16585729 · DOI
  116. Manning D Ethell S Donovan T Crawford T How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules Radiography 2006 12 2 134 142 10.1016/j.radi.2005.02.003 · DOI
  117. Manning, D., Ethell, S. C., & Crawford, T. (2003). Eye-tracking AFROC study of the influence of experience and training on chest X-ray interpretation. Proceedings of SPIE 5034, Medical Imaging 2003: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 5034X, 10.1117/12.479985. · DOI
  118. Manning DJ Ethell SC Donovan T Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph The British Journal of Radiology 2004 77 915 231 235 10.1259/bjr/28883951 15020365 · DOI
  119. Marcal LP Fox PS Evans DB Fleming JB Varadhachary GR Katz MH Tamm EP Analysis of free-form radiology dictations for completeness and clarity for pancreatic cancer staging Abdominal Imaging 2015 40 7 2391 2397 10.1007/s00261-015-0420-1 25906341 · DOI
  120. Marcovici PA Taylor GA Journal Club: structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports American Journal of Roentgenology 2014 203 6 1265 1271 10.2214/AJR.14.12636 25415704 · DOI
  121. Marr D Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information 1982 Cambridge MIT Press
  122. Mathie AG Strickland NH Interpretation of CT scans with PACS image display in stack mode Radiology 1997 203 1 207 209 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122394 9122394 · DOI
  123. Matsukura M Brockmole JR Boot WR Henderson JM Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load Vision Research 2011 51 6 546 552 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.014 21310171 · DOI
  124. Matsumoto H Terao Y Yugeta A Fukuda H Emoto M Furubayashi T Where do neurologists look when viewing brain CT images? An eye-tracking study involving stroke cases PLoS One 2011 6 12 e28928 10.1371/journal.pone.0028928 22174928 PMC3236228 · DOI
  125. McCarley JS Wang RF Kramer AF Irwin DE Peterson MS How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science 2003 14 5 422 426 10.1111/1467-9280.01457 12930471 · DOI
  126. McLaughlin L Bond R Hughes C McConnell J McFadden S Computing eye gaze metrics for the automatic assessment of radiographer performance during x-ray image interpretation International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017 105 11 21 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.001 28750903 · DOI
  127. McLeod P Driver J Dienes Z Crisp J Filtering by movement in visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991 17 1 55 1826322
  128. Mehoudar E Arizpe J Baker CI Yovel G Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers Journal of Vision 2014 14 7 6 6 10.1167/14.7.6 25057839 PMC4062043 · DOI
  129. Mello-Thoms, C. (2008). How much agreement is there in the visual search strategy of experts reading mammograms. Proceedings of SPIE 6917, Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 691704, 10.1117/12.768835. · DOI
  130. Mello-Thoms, C. (2009). The holistic grail: possible implications of an initial mistake in the reading of digital mammograms. Proceedings of SPIE 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 72630L, 10.1117/12.813778. · DOI
  131. Mercan E Shapiro LG Brunyé TT Weaver DL Elmore JG Characterizing diagnostic search patterns in digital breast pathology: scanners and drillers Journal of Digital Imaging 2018 31 1 32 41 10.1007/s10278-017-9990-5 28681097 PMC5788829 · DOI
  132. Michell MJ Iqbal A Wasan RK Evans DR Peacock C Lawinski CP A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis Clinical Radiology 2012 67 10 976 981 10.1016/j.crad.2012.03.009 22625656 · DOI
  133. Mital PK Smith TJ Hill RL Henderson JM Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion Cognitive Computation 2011 3 1 5 24 10.1007/s12559-010-9074-z · DOI
  134. Mousa DSA Brennan PC Ryan EA Lee WB Tan J Mello-Thoms C How mammographic breast density affects radiologists’ visual search patterns Academic Radiology 2014 21 11 1386 1393 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.013 25172414 · DOI
  135. Myles-Worsley M Johnston WA Simons MA The influence of expertise on x-ray image processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988 14 3 553 557 2969946
  136. Nakashima R Komori Y Maeda E Yoshikawa T Yokosawa K Temporal characteristics of radiologists’ and novices’ lesion detection in viewing medical images presented rapidly and sequentially Frontiers in Psychology 2016 7 1553 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01553 27774080 PMC5054019 · DOI
  137. National Cancer Institute Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) (2018). Radiology data from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium Sarcomas [CPTAC-SAR] collection [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. 10.7937/TCIA.2019.9bt23r95. · DOI
  138. Nodine CF Krupinski EA Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO Academic Radiology 1998 5 9 603 612 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80295-X 9750889 · DOI
  139. Nodine CF Kundel HL Lauver SC Toto LC Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses Academic Radiology 1996 3 12 1000 1006 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80032-8 9017014 · DOI
  140. Nodine CF Kundel HL Mello-Thoms C Weinstein SP Orel SG Sullivan DC Conant EF How experience and training influence mammography expertise Academic Radiology 1999 6 10 575 585 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80252-9 10516859 · DOI
  141. Nodine CF Mello-Thoms C Kundel HL Weinstein SP Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation American Journal of Roentgenology 2002 179 4 917 923 10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790917 12239037 · DOI
  142. Norman GR Brooks LR Coblentz CL Babcook CJ The correlation of feature identification and category judgments in diagnostic radiology Memory & Cognition 1992 20 4 344 355 10.3758/BF03210919 1495397 · DOI
  143. Oh SH Kim MS The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004 11 2 275 281 10.3758/BF03196570 15260193 · DOI
  144. Olivers CN Eimer M On the difference between working memory and attentional set Neuropsychologia 2011 49 6 1553 1558 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.033 21145332 · DOI
  145. Olivers CN Meijer F Theeuwes J Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006 32 5 1243 1265 17002535
  146. Paeye C Madelain L Reinforcing saccadic amplitude variability in a visual search task Journal of Vision 2014 14 13 20 20 10.1167/14.13.20 25413626 · DOI
  147. Peterson MS Beck MR Vomela M Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory Perception & Psychophysics 2007 69 1 123 135 10.3758/BF03194459 17515222 · DOI
  148. Peterson MS Kramer AF Wang RF Irwin DE McCarley JS Visual search has memory Psychological Science 2001 12 4 287 292 10.1111/1467-9280.00353 11476094 · DOI
  149. Phillips P Boone D Mallett S Taylor SA Altman DG Manning D Method for tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal 3D CT colonography: technical description and proposed metrics for analysis Radiology 2013 267 3 924 931 10.1148/radiol.12120062 23382289 · DOI
  150. Porter G Troscianko T Gilchrist ID Effort during visual search and counting: insights from pupillometry The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007 60 2 211 229 10.1080/17470210600673818 17455055 · DOI
  151. Potter MC Meaning in visual search Science 1975 187 4180 965 966 10.1126/science.1145183 1145183 · DOI
  152. Poynter W Barber M Inman J Wiggins C Individuals exhibit idiosyncratic eye-movement behavior profiles across tasks Vision Research 2013 89 32 38 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.002 23867568 · DOI
  153. Rafferty EA Park JM Philpotts LE Poplack SP Sumkin JH Halpern EF Niklason LT Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial Radiology 2013 266 1 104 113 10.1148/radiol.12120674 23169790 PMC5410947 · DOI
  154. Rayner K Li X Williams CC Cave KR Well AD Eye movements during information processing tasks: individual differences and cultural effects Vision Research 2007 47 21 2714 2726 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007 17614113 PMC2048814 · DOI
  155. Ratcliff R McKoon G The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks Neural Computation 2008 20 4 873 922 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 18085991 PMC2474742 · DOI · Paper page
  156. Recarte MA Nunes LM Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2003 9 2 119 12877271
  157. Riggs CA Cornes K Godwin HJ Liversedge SP Guest R Donnelly N The importance of search strategy for finding targets in open terrain Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2017 2 1 14 28275707 PMC5318482
  158. Riggs CA Godwin HJ Mann CM Smith SJ Boardman M Liversedge SP Donnelly N Rummage search by expert dyads, novice dyads and novice individuals for objects hidden in houses Visual Cognition 2018 26 5 334 350 10.1080/13506285.2018.1445678 · DOI
  159. Rosskopf AB Dietrich TJ Hirschmann A Buck FM Sutter R Pfirrmann CW Quality management in musculoskeletal imaging: form, content, and diagnosis of knee MRI reports and effectiveness of three different quality improvement measures American Journal of Roentgenology 2015 204 5 1069 1074 10.2214/AJR.14.13216 25905943 · DOI
  160. Rubin GD Lung nodule and cancer detection in computed tomography screening Journal of Thoracic Imaging 2015 30 2 130 138 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000140 25658477 PMC4654704 · DOI
  161. Rubin GD Drew T Williams LH Samei E Krupinski E Perception of volumetric data The handbook of medical image perception and techniques 2018 2 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 307 327
  162. Rubin GD Roos JE Tall M Harrawood B Bag S Ly DL Characterizing search, recognition, and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: elucidation with eye tracking Radiology 2015 274 1 276 286 10.1148/radiol.14132918 25325324 · DOI
  163. Ruutiainen AT Durand DJ Scanlon MH Itri JN Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight Academic Radiology 2013 20 3 305 311 10.1016/j.acra.2012.09.028 23452475 · DOI
  164. Scarince Collin Hout Michael C Cutting through the MADness: Expectations about what a target is doing impact how likely it is to be found in dynamic visual displays Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2018 71 11 2342 2354 10.1177/1747021817741408 30362402 · DOI
  165. Schwartz LH Panicek DM Berk AR Li Y Hricak H Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting Radiology 2011 260 1 174 181 10.1148/radiol.11101913 21518775 PMC3121011 · DOI
  166. Seltzer SE Judy PF Adams DF Jacobson FL Stark P Kikinis R Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing Radiology 1995 197 1 73 78 10.1148/radiology.197.1.7568857 7568857 · DOI
  167. Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2000). On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision, 14(1), 59–75. 11334182
  168. Simons DJ Chabris CF Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events Perception 1999 28 9 1059 1074 10.1068/p281059 10694957 · DOI · Paper page
  169. Smith AD Hood BM Gilchrist ID Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task Cognitive Processing 2008 9 2 121 126 10.1007/s10339-007-0200-0 18188627 · DOI
  170. Solman GJ Cheyne JA Smilek D Found and missed: failing to recognize a search target despite moving it Cognition 2012 123 1 100 118 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.006 22240076 · DOI
  171. Solman GJ Hickey K Smilek D Comparing target detection errors in visual search and manually-assisted search Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2014 76 4 945 958 10.3758/s13414-014-0641-3 24554230 · DOI
  172. Solman GJ Kingstone A Endogenous strategy in exploration Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2015 41 6 1634 1649 26214501
  173. Solman GJ Kingstone A Spatial partitions systematize visual search and enhance target memory Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2017 79 2 449 458 10.3758/s13414-016-1232-2 27826947 · DOI
  174. Solman GJ Wu N Cheyne JA Smilek D In manually-assisted search, perception supervises rather than directs action Experimental Psychology 2013 60 4 243 254 10.1027/1618-3169/a000193 23422655 · DOI
  175. Song JH Jiang Y Connecting the past with the present: how do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory? Journal of Vision 2005 5 4 4 4 10.1167/5.4.4 15929655 · DOI
  176. Soto D Heinke D Humphreys GW Blanco MJ Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005 31 2 248 261 15826228
  177. Spangler ML Zuley ML Sumkin JH Abrams G Ganott MA Hakim C Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison American Journal of Roentgenology 2011 196 2 320 324 10.2214/AJR.10.4656 21257882 · DOI
  178. Stuijfzand BG Van Der Schaaf MF Kirschner FC Ravesloot CJ Van Der Gijp A Vincken KL Medical students’ cognitive load in volumetric image interpretation: insights from human-computer interaction and eye movements Computers in Human Behavior 2016 62 394 403 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.015 · DOI
  179. Swensson RG A two-stage detection model applied to skilled visual search by radiologists Perception & Psychophysics 1980 27 1 11 16 10.3758/BF03199899 · DOI
  180. Takeda Y Yagi A Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible Perception & Psychophysics 2000 62 5 927 934 10.3758/BF03212078 10997039 · DOI
  181. Theeuwes J Kramer AF Hahn S Irwin DE Zelinsky GJ Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999 25 6 1595 10641312
  182. Thomas EL Lansdown EL Visual search patterns of radiologists in training Radiology 1963 81 2 288 292 10.1148/81.2.288 14053771 · DOI
  183. Torralba A Oliva A Castelhano MS Henderson JM Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search Psychological Review 2006 113 4 766 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766 17014302 · DOI
  184. Treisman AM Gelade G A feature-integration theory of attention Cognitive Psychology 1980 12 1 97 136 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 7351125 · DOI · Paper page
  185. Tuddenham WJ Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis: studies of the psychophysiology of roentgen image perception Memorial Fund lecture Radiology 1962 78 5 694 704 10.1148/78.5.694 13923013 · DOI
  186. Unsworth N Robison MK Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2018 80 2 461 484 10.3758/s13414-017-1455-x 29204866 · DOI
  187. Vaidyanathan, P., Pelz, J., Alm, C., Shi, P., & Haake, A. (2014). Recurrence quantification analysis reveals eye-movement behavior differences between experts and novices. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, (pp. 303–306). New York: ACM.
  188. van der Gijp A Ravesloot CJ Jarodzka H van der Schaaf MF van der Schaaf IC van Schaik JP Ten Cate TJ How visual search relates to visual diagnostic performance: a narrative systematic review of eye-tracking research in radiology Advances in Health Sciences Education 2016 22 3 765 787 10.1007/s10459-016-9698-1 27436353 PMC5498587 · DOI
  189. van der Gijp A Ravesloot CJ van der Schaaf MF van der Schaaf IC Huige JC Vincken KL Volumetric and two-dimensional image interpretation show different cognitive processes in learners Academic Radiology 2015 22 5 632 639 10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.001 25704588 · DOI
  190. van Geel K Kok EM Dijkstra J Robben SG van Merriënboer JJ Teaching systematic viewing to final-year medical students improves systematicity but not coverage or detection of radiologic abnormalities Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017 14 2 235 241 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.001 28161024 · DOI
  191. van Wermeskerken M Litchfield D van Gog T What am I looking at? Interpreting dynamic and static gaze displays Cognitive Science 2018 42 1 220 252 10.1111/cogs.12484 28295482 PMC5811818 · DOI
  192. Vaughan, J. (1984). Saccades directed at previously attended locations in space. In A. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds), Advances in Psychology, (vol. 22, pp. 143–150). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
  193. Venjakob, A., Marnitz, T., Mahler, J., Sechelmann, S., & Roetting, M. (2012). Radiologists’ eye gaze when reading cranial CT images. Proceedings of SPIE 8318, Medical Imaging 2012: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 83180B, 10.1117/12.913611. · DOI
  194. Venjakob AC Marnitz T Phillips P Mello-Thoms CR Image size influences visual search and perception of hemorrhages when reading cranial CT: an eye-tracking study Human Factors 2016 58 3 441 451 10.1177/0018720816630450 26936388 · DOI
  195. Venjakob AC Mello-Thoms CR Review of prospects and challenges of eye tracking in volumetric imaging Journal of Medical Imaging 2015 3 1 011002 10.1117/1.JMI.3.1.011002 27081663 PMC4814545 · DOI
  196. Võ MLH Aizenman AM Wolfe JM You think you know where you looked? You better look again Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2016 42 10 1477 27668308 PMC5079107
  197. Võ MLH Wolfe JM The role of memory for visual search in scenes Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2015 1339 1 72 81 10.1111/nyas.12667 25684693 PMC4376654 · DOI
  198. Wen G Aizenman A Drew T Wolfe JM Haygood TM Markey MK Computational assessment of visual search strategies in volumetric medical images Journal of Medical Imaging 2016 3 1 015501 10.1117/1.JMI.3.1.015501 26759815 PMC4702525 · DOI
  199. Wildman-Tobriner B Allen BC Bashir MR Camp M Miller C Fiorillo LE Structured reportings of CT enterography for inflammatory bowel disease: effect on key feature reporting, accuracy across training levels, and subjective assessment of disease by referring physicians Abdominal Radiology 2017 42 9 2243 2250 10.1007/s00261-017-1136-1 28393301 · DOI
  200. Williams LH Drew T Distraction in diagnostic radiology: how is search through volumetric medical images affected by interruptions? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2017 2 1 12 28275705 PMC5318487

200 of 213 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, L. H., & Drew, T.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Lauren H.
Venue
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Published
2019-07-08
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
2365-7464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2956288601
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1747505)
  • National Cancer Institute (1R01CA225585-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
medical image perception, radiology, anomaly detection, search behavior, depth perception, smooth pursuit eye movements, radiology errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review