Cited by 58Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesRadiology practices and educationInnovations in Medical Education

Transfer of expertise: An eye tracking and think aloud study using dynamic medical visualizations

Gegenfurtner, Andreas, Seppänen, Marko·2013·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.021

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Richer mental models are created which allow experienced clinicians to more readily recognize when a new clinical scenario may fit with a previously identified pattern.

    “Richer mental models are created which allow experienced clinicians to more readily recognize when a new clinical scenario may fit with a previously identified pattern (Gegenfurtner and Seppa ¨nen 2013).”

    From Measuring physician cognitive load: validity evidence for a physiologic and a psychometric tool (2017) · cites this paper as Gegenfurtner and Seppa ¨nen 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gegenfurtner, A., & Seppänen, M.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Turku University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Gegenfurtner, Andreas
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
63
Pages
393-403
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086312189
Cited by
58
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
expert knowledge transfer, expert performance, radiology, nuclear medicine, diagnostic imaging, think-aloud, eye tracking, technology-enhanced learning, medical education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review