Cited by 86Online Learning and AnalyticsInnovative Teaching MethodsTeaching and Learning Programming

Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: procrastination persists

Open access
AlJarrah, Abeer, Thomas, Michael K., Shehab, Mohamed·2018·International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Abstract

This paper reports on a study that examines the learning behaviors and characteristics of students in a mobile applications computer programming class that adopted a “flipped” learning style. By harvesting learning analytics data from a learning management system, we created visualizations of work intensity to explore temporal patterns of students’ behavior and then correlate them with the students’ performance. Findings indicate that low, medium, and high performing students tend to access learning materials late with work intensity spiking on the lecture day, specifically during the lecture session. While high and low performing students show no difference in temporal access to material, medium performing students demonstrate the greatest degree of vibrancy regarding course content material access. Further a discussion of implications and insights on procrastination in the context of flipped classrooms are included.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41239-017-0083-9

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bakharia, A., & Dawson, S. (2011). Snapp: a bird's-eye view of temporal participant interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 168-173): ACM.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AlJarrah, A., Thomas, M. K., & Shehab, M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
AlJarrah, Abeer
Venue
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Published
2018-01-09
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783876999
Cited by
86
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
flipped classroom, procrastination, learning analytics, work intensity, student performance, programming education, learning management system data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review