Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course
Open accessAbstract
As a cutting-edge field of artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) that depends on advanced computing technologies, AI performance prediction model is widely used to identify at-risk students that tend to fail, establish student-centered learning pathways, and optimize instructional design and development. A majority of the existing AI prediction models focus on the development and optimization of the accuracy of AI algorithms rather than applying AI models to provide student with in-time and continuous feedback and improve the students’ learning quality. To fill this gap, this research integrated an AI performance prediction model with learning analytics approaches with a goal to improve student learning effects in a collaborative learning context. Quasi-experimental research was conducted in an online engineering course to examine the differences of students’ collaborative learning effect with and without the support of the integrated approach. Results showed that the integrated approach increased student engagement, improved collaborative learning performances, and strengthen student satisfactions about learning. This research made contributions to proposing an integrated approach of AI models and learning analytics (LA) feedback and providing paradigmatic implications for future development of AI-driven learning analytics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies that integrated LMS data with surveys and interviews uncovered deeper patterns and underlying causes of student behaviours.
“For instance, studies that integrated LMS data with surveys and interviews uncovered deeper patterns and underlying causes of student behaviours (Dobashi et al., 2022;Ouyang et al., 2023).”
From Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Ouyang et al., 2023
The Data collection and analysis section (page unavailable) describes combining DingTalk discussions, written assignments, and students’ personal reflections; the Results section identifies patterns in engagement and perceptions. It does not describe integrating LMS data with surveys and interviews, or establish underlying causes of student behaviour. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
S., N. L. (2017) · doi:10.1177/1609406917733847 · Cited by 14,051 · see citing works
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Next-generation educational technologies have led to the extensive applications of computers and information and related computing technologies in education, such as artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) (Chassignal et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2020; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview
Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
A survey of human-in-the-loop for machine learning
Wu, X., Xiao, L., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Ma, T., & He, L. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2022.05.014 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Human-centered Artificial Intelligence in education: Seeing the invisible through the visible
Yang, S. J. H., Ogata, H., Matsui, T., & Chen, N.-S. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100008 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Amon MJ Vrzakova H D’Mello SK Beyond dyadic coordination: Multimodal behavioral irregularity in triads predicts facets of collaborative problem solving Cognitive Science 2019 43 10 e12787 10.1111/cogs.12787 31621123 · DOI
- Asif R Merceron A Ali SA Haider NG Analyzing undergraduate students’ performance using educational data mining Computers & Education 2017 113 177 194 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.007 · DOI
- Aydoğdu S A new student modeling technique with convolutional neural networks: Learnerprints Journal of Educational Computing Research 2021 59 4 603 619 10.1177/0735633120969216 · DOI
- Baneres D Rodriguez-Gonzalez ME Serra M An early feedback prediction system for learners at-risk within a first-year higher education course IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2019 12 2 249 263 10.1109/TLT.2019.2912167 · DOI · Paper page
- Bernacki ML Chavez MM Uesbeck PM Predicting achievement and providing support before STEM majors begin to fail Computers & Education 2020 158 103999 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103999 · DOI
- Bravo-Agapito J Romero SJ Pamplona S Early prediction of undergraduate Student’s academic performance in completely online learning: A five-year study Computers in Human Behavior 2021 115 106595 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106595 · DOI
- Cen L Ruta D Powell L Hirsch B Ng J Quantitative approach to collaborative learning: Performance prediction, individual assessment, and group composition International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2016 11 187 225 10.1007/s11412-016-9234-6 · DOI
- Chango W Cerezo R Sanchez-Santillan M Azevedo R Romero C Improving prediction of students’ performance in intelligent tutoring systems using attribute selection and ensembles of different multimodal data sources Journal of Computing in Higher Education 2021 33 3 614 634 10.1007/s12528-021-09298-8 · DOI
- Chen X Xie H Zou D Hwang GJ Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2020 1 100002 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002 · DOI · Paper page
- Damşa CI The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2014 9 247 281 10.1007/s11412-014-9193-8 · DOI
- Darvishi A Khosravi H Sadiq S Gašević D Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems British Journal of Educational Technology 2022 53 4 844 875 10.1111/bjet.13233 · DOI · Paper page
- de Carvalho WF Zárate LE A new local causal learning algorithm applied in learning analytics The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 2020 38 1 103 115 10.1108/IJILT-04-2020-0046 · DOI
- Dillenbourg P Dillenbourg P What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (Vol 1) 1999 Oxford Elsevier 1 15
- Drake PR Using the analytic hierarchy process in engineering education International Journal of Engineering Education 1998 14 3 191 196
- FoK WWT He YS Yeung HHA Law KY Cheung KH Ai YY Ho P Li S Prediction model for students’ future development by deep learning and tensorflow artificial intelligence engine 4th IEEE international conference on information management 2018 IEEE 103 106
- Fung CC Li JB Wong KW Wong KP A java-based parallel platform for the implementation of evolutionary computation for engineering applications International Journal of Systems Science 2004 35 741 750 10.1080/00207720412331303651 · DOI
- Guzman E Conejo R Perez-de-la-Cruz JL Improving student performance using self-assessment tests IEEE Intelligent Systems 2007 22 4 46 52 10.1109/MIS.2007.71 · DOI
- Hoppe HU Doberstein D Hecking T Using sequence analysis to determine the well-functioning of small groups in large online courses International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2021 31 680 699 10.1007/s40593-020-00229-9 · DOI
- Hwang GJ Xie H Wah BW Gašević D Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2020 1 100001 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001 · DOI · Paper page
- Jiao P Ouyang F Zhang Q Alavi AH Artificial intelligence-enabled prediction model of student academic performance in online engineering education Artificial Intelligence Review 2022 10.1007/s10462-022-10155-y · DOI
- Lam PC Doverspike D Mawasha RP Predicting success in a minority engineering program Journal of Engineering Education 1999 88 3 265 267 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00445.x · DOI
- Lau ET Sun L Yang Q Modelling, prediction and classification of student academic performance using artificial neural networks SN Applied Sciences 2019 1 982 10.1007/s42452-019-0884-7 · DOI
- Li X Ouyang F Chen W Examining the effect of a genetic algorithm-enabled grouping method on collaborative performances, processes, and perceptions Journal of Computing in Higher Education 2022 10.1007/s12528-022-09321-6 PMC9151354 35668836 · DOI
- Liao CH Chiang CT Chen IC Parker KR Exploring the relationship between computational thinking and learning satisfaction for non-STEM college students International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2022 19 43 10.1186/s41239-022-00347-5 · DOI
- Luckin R Cukurova M Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences driven approach British Journal of Educational Technology 2019 50 6 2824 2838 10.1111/bjet.12861 · DOI
- Marbouti F Diefes-Dux HA Madhavan K Models for early prediction of at-risk students in a course using standards-based grading Computers & Education 2016 103 1 15 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.005 · DOI
- Mitrovic A Bauer M Gmytrasiewicz PJ Vassileva J Investigating students' self-assessment skills UM2001: User modeling 2001 Springer Berlin 247 250
- Mozer MC Wiseheart M Novikoff TP Artificial intelligence to support human instruction Proceedings of the National Association of Science 2019 116 10 3953 3955 10.1073/pnas.1900370116 PMC6410845 30782820 · DOI
- Nabizadeh AH Leal JP Rafsanjani HN Shah RR Learning path personalization and recommendation methods: A survey of the state-of-the-art Expert Systems with Applications 2020 159 113596 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113596 · DOI
- Nicholls GM Wolfe H Besterfield-Sacre M Shuman LJ Predicting STEM degree outcomes based on eighth grade data and standard test scores Journal of Engineering Education 2010 99 3 209 223 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01057.x · DOI
- Ouyang F Jiao P Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2021 2 100020 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020 · DOI · Paper page
- Sandoval A Gonzalez C Alarcon R Pichara K Montenegro M Centralized student performance prediction in large courses based on low-cost variables in an institutional context The Internet and Higher Education 2018 37 76 89 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.02.002 · DOI
- Sharabiani, A., Karim, F., Sharabiani, A., Atanasov, M., & Darabi, H. (2014). An enhanced Bayesian network model for prediction of students’ academic performance in engineering programs. In 2014 IEEE global engineering education conference (pp. 832–837). IEEE. 10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826192 · DOI
- Starcic AI Human learning and learning analytics in the age of artificial intelligence British Journal of Educational Technology 2019 50 6 2974 2976 10.1111/bjet.12879 · DOI · Paper page
- Sullivan FR Keith PK Exploring the potential of natural language processing to support microgenetic analysis of collaborative learning discussions British Journal of Educational Technology 2019 50 6 3047 3063 10.1111/bjet.12875 · DOI
- Suthers D Verbert K Suthers D Berbert K Duval E Ochoa X Learning analytics as a “middle space” Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on learning analytics & knowledge 2013 ACM New York 1 4
- Taheri A RahimiZadeh K Rao RV An efficient balanced teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm with individual restarting strategy for solving global optimization problems Information Sciences. 2021 576 68 104 10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.064 · DOI
- Tahiru F AI in education: A systematic literature review Journal of Cases on Information Technology 2021 23 1 1 20 10.4018/JCIT.2021010101 · DOI
- Tomasevic N Gvozdenovic N Vranes S An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction Computers & Education 2020 143 103676 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676 · DOI
- Toyoda R Russo-Abegao F Glassey J VR-based health and safety training in various high-risk engineering industries: A literature review International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2022 19 42 10.1186/s41239-022-00349-3 · DOI
- Waheed H Hassan SU Aljohami NR Hardman J Alelyani S Nawaz R Predicting academic performance of students from VLE big data using deep learning models Computers in Human Behavior 2021 104 106189 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106189 · DOI
- Xie H Chu HC Hwang GJ Wang CC Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017 Computers & Education 2019 140 103599 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599 · DOI · Paper page
- Xing W Du D Dropout prediction in MOOCs: Using deep learning for personalized intervention Journal of Educational Computing Research 2019 57 3 547 570 10.1177/0735633118757015 · DOI
- Xing W Du D Bakhshi A Chiu KC Du H Designing a transferable predictive model for online learning using a Bayesian updating approach IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2021 14 4 474 485 10.1109/TLT.2021.3107349 · DOI
- Yang F Li FWB Study on student performance estimation, student progress analysis, and student potential prediction based on data mining Computers & Education 2018 123 97 108 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.006 · DOI
- Yang YF Tsai CC Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment Learning and Instruction 2010 20 72 83 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lin, C.-C., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Lu, O. H. T. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y · Cited by 669 · see citing works
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. M., Yang, X., & Khan, Q. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Fu, Y., & Weng, Z. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100306 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania
Rudolph, J., Mohamed Ismail, F. M., & Popenici, S. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/54fs5e77 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review
Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Cai, L., Msafiri, M. M., & Kangwa, D. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13112-0 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Msambwa, M. M., Wen, Z., & Daniel, K. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12909 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review on Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., Molla, A., & Asmare, M. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18060352 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., & Wen, Z. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70036 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
AI-Powered E-Learning for Lifelong Learners: Impact on Performance and Knowledge Application
Ahn, H. Y. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16209066 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
University students’ trust in AI: Examining reliance and strategies for critical engagement.
Abuzar, M., Mahmudulhassan, & Muthoifin (2025) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v19i07.52875 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Ayanda, A. O. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Resilience and Sustainability · doi:10.70593/deepsci.0203003
“These systems use collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, and predictive analytics to match students with learning materials that align with their interests, abilities, and progress levels [53,54].”
- Authors
- Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., & Jiao, P.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Jiao, Pengcheng
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
- Published
- 2023-01-17
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-4
- ISSN
- 2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9842403
- OpenAlex
- W4316657447
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 114 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 36
- FWCI
- 87.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62177041)
- the Graduate Education Research Project of Zhejiang University (20210308)
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- learning analytics, cooperative learning, student engagement, at-risk students, student satisfaction, learning outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review