Cited by 128Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesScience Education and Perceptions

Science That Matters: The Importance of a Cultural Connection in Underrepresented Students’ Science Pursuit

Open access
Jackson, Matthew C., Galvez, Gino, Landa, Isidro, Buonora, Paul, Thoman, Dustin B.·2016·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

Recent research suggests that underrepresented minority (URM) college students, and especially first-generation URMs, may lose motivation to persist if they see science careers as unable to fulfill culturally relevant career goals. In the present study, we used a mixed-methods approach to explore patterns of motivation to pursue physical and life sciences across ethnic groups of freshman college students, as moderated by generational status. Results from a longitudinal survey (N = 249) demonstrated that freshman URM students who enter with a greater belief that science can be used to help their communities identified as scientists more strongly over time, but only among first-generation college students. Analysis of the survey data were consistent with content analysis of 11 transcripts from simultaneously conducted focus groups (N = 67); together, these studies reveal important differences in motivational characteristics both across and within ethnicity across educational generation status. First-generation URM students held the strongest prosocial values for pursuing a science major (e.g., giving back to the community). URM students broadly reported additional motivation to increase the status of their family (e.g., fulfilling aspirations for a better life). These findings demonstrate the importance of culturally connected career motives and for examining intersectional identities to understand science education choices and inform efforts to broaden participation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0067

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This grittiness may be based on differences in motivation, as students from MGS are more likely than students from non-MGS to be driven by a commitment to family and community.

    “This grittiness may be based on differences in motivation, as students from MGS are more likely than students from non-MGS to be driven by a commitment to family and community (41–43).”

    From Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020) · cites this paper as [42]

    The focus-group conclusion reports stronger family-related motivations among Latino and Asian students, especially first-generation Latino students, while the section on prosocial goals describes greater emphasis on giving back to the community among underrepresented groups than among white students. The paper does not use the MGS/non-MGS comparison or test whether these motivations explain grittiness. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tran M Herrera F Garibay J When science lacks diversity and social relevance can students be objective scientists and still be themselves 2011 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Conference on Race and Ethnicity in American Higher Education, held May 31–June 4 in San Francisco, CA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, M. C., Galvez, G., Landa, I., Buonora, P., & Thoman, D. B.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Long Beach (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Matthew C.
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2016-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
ar42
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2507640572
Cited by
128
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1420271)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T34GM008074, R25GM071638)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords
underrepresented minority students, first-generation college students, cultural connections, prosocial values, ethnic differences, generational status, intersectional identities, broadening participation in STEM
MeSH terms
Family, Humans, Minority Groups, Surveys and Questionnaires, Science, Students, Focus Groups, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review