Cited by 128Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesScience Education and Perceptions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Science That Matters: The Importance of a Cultural Connection in Underrepresented Students’ Science Pursuit

Open access

Abstract

Recent research suggests that underrepresented minority (URM) college students, and especially first-generation URMs, may lose motivation to persist if they see science careers as unable to fulfill culturally relevant career goals. In the present study, we used a mixed-methods approach to explore patterns of motivation to pursue physical and life sciences across ethnic groups of freshman college students, as moderated by generational status. Results from a longitudinal survey (N = 249) demonstrated that freshman URM students who enter with a greater belief that science can be used to help their communities identified as scientists more strongly over time, but only among first-generation college students. Analysis of the survey data were consistent with content analysis of 11 transcripts from simultaneously conducted focus groups (N = 67); together, these studies reveal important differences in motivational characteristics both across and within ethnicity across educational generation status. First-generation URM students held the strongest prosocial values for pursuing a science major (e.g., giving back to the community). URM students broadly reported additional motivation to increase the status of their family (e.g., fulfilling aspirations for a better life). These findings demonstrate the importance of culturally connected career motives and for examining intersectional identities to understand science education choices and inform efforts to broaden participation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0067

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

3 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Cabrera AF, 1999, J High Educ, 70, 134
  2. Harackiewicz JM, 2015, J Pers Soc Psychol
  3. Morgan DL, 1998, The Focus Group Kit, Vols. 1–6
  4. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2013, STEM in Postsecondary Education: Entrance, Attrition, and Coursetaking among 2003−04 Beginning Postsecondary Students (NCES 2013-152)
  5. QSR International, 2014, NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software, version 10
  6. Smedley BD, 1993, J High Educ, 64, 434, 10.2307/2960051 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Steele CM, 1992, Atlantic Monthly, 269, 68

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, M. C., Galvez, G., Landa, I., Buonora, P., & Thoman, D. B.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Long Beach (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Matthew C.
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2016-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
ar42
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2507640572
Cited by
128
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1420271)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T34GM008074, R25GM071638)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords
underrepresented minority students, first-generation college students, cultural connections, prosocial values, ethnic differences, generational status, intersectional identities, broadening participation in STEM
MeSH terms
Family, Humans, Minority Groups, Surveys and Questionnaires, Science, Students, Focus Groups, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review