Cited by 48Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsStudent Assessment and FeedbackScience Education and Pedagogy

Introductory Biology Students’ Use of Enhanced Answer Keys and Reflection Questions to Engage in Metacognition and Enhance Understanding

Open access
Sabel, Jaime L., Dauer, Joseph T., Forbes, Cory T.·2017·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

Providing feedback to students as they learn to integrate individual concepts into complex systems is an important way to help them to develop robust understanding, but it is challenging in large, undergraduate classes for instructors to provide feedback that is frequent and directed enough to help individual students. Various scaffolds can be used to help students engage in self-regulated learning and generate internal feedback to improve their learning. This study examined the use of enhanced answer keys with added reflection questions and instruction as scaffolds for engaging undergraduate students in self-regulated learning within an introductory biology course. Study findings show that both the enhanced answer keys and reflection questions helped students to engage in metacognition and develop greater understanding of biological concepts. Further, students who received additional instruction on the use of the scaffolds changed how they used them and, by the end of the semester, were using the scaffolds in significantly different ways and showed significantly higher learning gains than students who did not receive the instruction. These findings provide evidence for the benefit of designing scaffolds within biology courses that will support students in engaging in metacognition and enhancing their understanding of biological concepts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.16-10-0298

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scaffolding-the breaking down of a complex concept or task into smaller parts that can be structured with guidance for students-is a common instructional strategy that can improve students' self-regulation of learning and student learning outcomes in STEM.

    “Scaffolding—the breaking down of a complex concept or task into smaller parts that can be structured with guidance for students—is a common instructional strategy that can improve students’ self-regulation of learning and student learning outcomes in STEM (Belland, 2016; Offerdahl et al., 2017; Sabel et al., 2017; Ewell et al., 2022).”

    From Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom (2023) · cites this paper as Sabel et al., 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Students learn by using wrappers that their current study strategies may not be working and gain insights on how to improve in future semesters, potentially developing a growth mindset.

    “Students learn by using wrappers that their current study strategies may not be working and provide them with insights on how to improve in future semesters, potentially developing a growth mindset (Knight et al., 2022;Sabel et al., 2017).”

    From The Potential of Exam Wrappers in Higher Education Assessment Practice: Fostering Self-Efficacy Through Guided Self-Reflection (2025) · cites this paper as Sabel et al., 2017

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that enhanced answer keys and reflection questions helped students recognize misunderstandings and reflect on their studying. It does not establish that these tools were wrappers, that students gained insights for future semesters, or that they developed a growth mindset. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gall M. D. Gall J. P. Borg W. R. Educational research: An introduction 2007 8th ed.). Boston, MA Pearson Education
  2. Miles M. B. Huberman A. M. Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook 2014 3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA Sage
  3. Young A. Fry J. D. Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2008 8 2 1 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabel, J. L., Dauer, J. T., & Forbes, C. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Sabel, Jaime L.
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2017-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
ar40
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2699138449
Cited by
48
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
metacognition, student self-regulation, scaffolds, reflective questions, feedback, introductory biology, student understanding, learning gains
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Biology, Feedback, Humans, Learning, Students, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review