Introductory Biology Students’ Use of Enhanced Answer Keys and Reflection Questions to Engage in Metacognition and Enhance Understanding
Open accessAbstract
Providing feedback to students as they learn to integrate individual concepts into complex systems is an important way to help them to develop robust understanding, but it is challenging in large, undergraduate classes for instructors to provide feedback that is frequent and directed enough to help individual students. Various scaffolds can be used to help students engage in self-regulated learning and generate internal feedback to improve their learning. This study examined the use of enhanced answer keys with added reflection questions and instruction as scaffolds for engaging undergraduate students in self-regulated learning within an introductory biology course. Study findings show that both the enhanced answer keys and reflection questions helped students to engage in metacognition and develop greater understanding of biological concepts. Further, students who received additional instruction on the use of the scaffolds changed how they used them and, by the end of the semester, were using the scaffolds in significantly different ways and showed significantly higher learning gains than students who did not receive the instruction. These findings provide evidence for the benefit of designing scaffolds within biology courses that will support students in engaging in metacognition and enhancing their understanding of biological concepts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scaffolding-the breaking down of a complex concept or task into smaller parts that can be structured with guidance for students-is a common instructional strategy that can improve students' self-regulation of learning and student learning outcomes in STEM.
“Scaffolding—the breaking down of a complex concept or task into smaller parts that can be structured with guidance for students—is a common instructional strategy that can improve students’ self-regulation of learning and student learning outcomes in STEM (Belland, 2016; Offerdahl et al., 2017; Sabel et al., 2017; Ewell et al., 2022).”
From Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom (2023) · cites this paper as Sabel et al., 2017
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredStudents learn by using wrappers that their current study strategies may not be working and gain insights on how to improve in future semesters, potentially developing a growth mindset.
“Students learn by using wrappers that their current study strategies may not be working and provide them with insights on how to improve in future semesters, potentially developing a growth mindset (Knight et al., 2022;Sabel et al., 2017).”
From The Potential of Exam Wrappers in Higher Education Assessment Practice: Fostering Self-Efficacy Through Guided Self-Reflection (2025) · cites this paper as Sabel et al., 2017
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that enhanced answer keys and reflection questions helped students recognize misunderstandings and reflect on their studying. It does not establish that these tools were wrappers, that students gained insights for future semesters, or that they developed a growth mindset. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods
Lotto, L. S., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1986) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737008003329 · Cited by 10,338 · see citing works
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Instructors can support students in this process by providing them with opportunities to consider and refine their knowledge within scientific contexts (e.g., Handelsman et al., 2004; Haak et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2014; Dolan and Collins, 2015).”
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…engage in metacognition, and use their own self-generated feedback; and 2) that doing so leads to improved learning and greater success in school (Sadler, 1989; Black and Wiliam, 1998; Pintrich, 2000; Bell and Cowie, 2001; Zimmerman and Schunk, 2001; Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Wood, 2009).”
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7 · Cited by 6,069 · cited 3× · see citing works
“, 2006; Sinatra and Taasoobshirazi, 2011), and three phases that function in a cyclical manner: 1) forethought, 2) performance or volitional control, and 3) selfreflection (Zimmerman, 2000).”
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Research has shown that students can effectively be their own sources of feedback via self-assessment and self-regulation (Ross et al., 1999; Boekaerts et al., 2000; Zimmerman and Schunk, 2001; Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Andrade et al., 2008).”
InfluentialThe Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Past work has shown that students can 1) learn to self-regulate their own learning, engage in metacognition, and use their own self-generated feedback; and 2) that doing so leads to improved learning and greater success in school (Sadler, 1989; Black and Wiliam, 1998; Pintrich, 2000; Bell and Cowie, 2001; Zimmerman an…”
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Students can take a proactive role in understanding their own learning by monitoring their own work and generating feedback they can use to adjust their strategies (Sadler, 1989; Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006).”
InfluentialSchraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…learning gains, and greater problem-solving abilities (Baird, 1986; Tobias and Everson, 1996; Rickey and Stacy, 2000; Anderson and Nashon, 2006; Schraw et al., 2006; Young and Fry, 2008; Vukman and Licardo, 2009; Sandi-Urena et al., 2011; Sinatra and Taasoobshirazi, 2011; Stanton et al., 2015).”
InfluentialSelf-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
(2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410601032 · Cited by 1,325 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Past research has shown that students can learn how to self-regulate their learning and that those who do so have greater success in classroom settings (Pintrich, 2000; Zimmerman and Schunk, 2001).”
InfluentialChildren's Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. (1987) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2203 · Cited by 988 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Metacognition involves the awareness of one’s own learning process (Wood, 2009) and includes both metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation (Lawson, 1984; Jacobs and Paris, 1987).”
Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology
Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204820 · Cited by 959 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Instructors can support students in this process by providing them with opportunities to consider and refine their knowledge within scientific contexts (e.g., Handelsman et al., 2004; Haak et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2014; Dolan and Collins, 2015).”
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1096022 · Cited by 928 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Instructors can support students in this process by providing them with opportunities to consider and refine their knowledge within scientific contexts (e.g., Handelsman et al., 2004; Haak et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2014; Dolan and Collins, 2015).”
Hansel, C. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/239177b0 · Cited by 706 · cited 2×
“Instructors can support students in this process by providing them with opportunities to consider and refine their knowledge within scientific contexts (e.g., Handelsman et al., 2004; Haak et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2014; Dolan and Collins, 2015).”
Handbook of Formative Assessment
Andrade, H. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science Education.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.1022 · Cited by 502 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Past work has shown that students can 1) learn to self-regulate their own learning, engage in metacognition, and use their own self-generated feedback; and 2) that doing so leads to improved learning and greater success in school (Sadler, 1989; Black and Wiliam, 1998; Pintrich, 2000; Bell and Cowie, 2001; Zimmerman an…”
Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Andrade, H. G. (2005) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.27-31 · Cited by 436 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Further, students may need instruction on how to properly use and understand rubrics (Andrade, 2005), but little work has focused on the type of instruction that would effectively enhance students’ use of rubrics or answer keys for self-regulated learning.”
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition
(2000) · doi:10.17226/9853 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance - do students see any relationship?
Lewis, J. M., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/095006900289949 · Cited by 350 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Students’ alternate conceptions may not be true misconceptions but rather a combination of confusion about the topic and difficulty with integrating independent ideas into dynamic systems (Lewis and Wood-Robinson, 2000; Marbach-Ad and Stavy, 2000; Smith and Knight, 2012).”
Innovations in Teaching Undergraduate Biology and Why We Need Them
Wood, W. B. (2009) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175306 · Cited by 273 · cited 9× · see citing works
“about a concept, what they needed to know to understand it better, what they did not understand, and whether or not they understood the idea well enough to apply the information to a different situation (Wood, 2009).”
InfluentialThe Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry.
Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. (2000) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed077p915 · Cited by 269 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These two components of metacognition and understanding are closely related, in that students can use metacognition to become aware of their own learning processes, which in turn helps students to perform better, have greater learning gains, and greater problem-solving abilities (Baird, 1986; Tobias and Everson, 1996;…”
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research has shown that students can effectively be their own sources of feedback via self-assessment and self-regulation (Ross et al., 1999; Boekaerts et al., 2000; Zimmerman and Schunk, 2001; Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Andrade et al., 2008).”
Panadero, E., Tapia, J. A., & Martínez, J. A. H. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007 · Cited by 244 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Panadero et al. (2012) had previously examined the use of self-assessment scripts to support students in engaging in self-regulation.”
Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena
Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655718 · Cited by 239 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This is especially important in undergraduate-level biology courses in which students may have confusion and difficulty connecting individual facts with complex, dynamic systems (Lewis and Wood- Robinson, 2000; Marbach-Ad and Stavy, 2000; Wilson et al., 2006; Smith and Knight, 2012).”
Tanner, K. D., & Allen, D. E. (2005) · Cell Biology Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068 · Cited by 206 · cited 4× · see citing works
“to be metacognitive and assign plausibility or intelligibility to their own ideas is one way to help students change their alternative conceptions to more scientifically accurate conceptions (Tanner and Allen, 2005).”
InfluentialImproving learning through enhanced metacognition: a classroom study
Baird, J. R. (1986) · European Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0140528860080303 · Cited by 205 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These two components of metacognition and understanding are closely related, in that students can use metacognition to become aware of their own learning processes, which in turn helps students to perform better, have greater learning gains, and greater problem-solving abilities (Baird, 1986; Tobias and Everson, 1996;…”
(2010) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851-12 · Cited by 190 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…feedback through self-regulated learning and self- assessment and that scaffolds, such as rubrics, can play a role in evaluation of ideas and generation of feedback (Ross et al., 1999; Boekaerts et al., 2000; Zimmerman and Schunk, 2001; Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Reddy, 2007; Andrade, 2010).”
Enhancement of Metacognition Use and Awareness by Means of a Collaborative Intervention
Sandí-Ureña, S., Cooper, M. M., & Stevens, R. H. (2010) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690903452922 · Cited by 158 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…learning gains, and greater problem-solving abilities (Baird, 1986; Tobias and Everson, 1996; Rickey and Stacy, 2000; Anderson and Nashon, 2006; Schraw et al., 2006; Young and Fry, 2008; Vukman and Licardo, 2009; Sandi-Urena et al., 2011; Sinatra and Taasoobshirazi, 2011; Stanton et al., 2015).”
InfluentialStanton, J. D., Neider, X. N., Gallegos, I. J., & Clark, N. C. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0135 · Cited by 144 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Students who employ metacognition perform better (e.g., Anderson and Nashon, 2006; Young and Fry, 2008; Vukman and Licardo, 2009; Stanton et al., 2015) and have increased learning outcomes (e.g., Baird, 1986; Tobias and Everson, 1996; Stanton et al., 2015) and increased problem-solving ability…”
InfluentialAssessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology.
Wilson, C. D., Anderson, C., Heidemann, M. K., Merrill, J. E., Merritt, B. W., Richmond, G., Sibley, D., & Parker, J. (2006) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142 · Cited by 136 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This is especially important in undergraduate-level biology courses in which students may have confusion and difficulty connecting individual facts with complex, dynamic systems (Lewis and Wood- Robinson, 2000; Marbach-Ad and Stavy, 2000; Wilson et al., 2006; Smith and Knight, 2012).”
Vukman, K. B., & Licardo, M. (2010) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055690903180376 · Cited by 131 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…learning gains, and greater problem-solving abilities (Baird, 1986; Tobias and Everson, 1996; Rickey and Stacy, 2000; Anderson and Nashon, 2006; Schraw et al., 2006; Young and Fry, 2008; Vukman and Licardo, 2009; Sandi-Urena et al., 2011; Sinatra and Taasoobshirazi, 2011; Stanton et al., 2015).”
InfluentialNicol, D., & Milligan, C. D. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203969670-16 · Cited by 123 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This engagement may help students take active control of their own learning and may be particularly useful in the self-reflection phase of self-regulated learning (Zimmerman, 2000; Nicol and Milligan, 2006).”
Sommer, A. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606716 · Cited by 122 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Self-regulated learning is composed of three major components: cognition, metacognition, and motivation (e.g., Schraw et al., 2006; Sinatra and Taasoobshirazi, 2011), and three phases that function in a cyclical manner: 1) forethought, 2) performance or volitional control, and 3) selfreflection…”
InfluentialAnderson, D., & Nashon, S. M. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20176 · Cited by 117 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These two components of metacognition and understanding are closely related, in that students can use metacognition to become aware of their own learning processes, which in turn helps students to perform better, have greater learning gains, and greater problem-solving abilities (Baird, 1986; Tobias and Everson, 1996;…”
Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing
Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam‐Gray, A. (1999) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00003-3 · Cited by 99 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…feedback through self-regulated learning and self- assessment and that scaffolds, such as rubrics, can play a role in evaluation of ideas and generation of feedback (Ross et al., 1999; Boekaerts et al., 2000; Zimmerman and Schunk, 2001; Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Reddy, 2007; Andrade, 2010).”
Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137810 · Cited by 91 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This is especially important in undergraduate-level biology courses in which students may have confusion and difficulty connecting individual facts with complex, dynamic systems (Lewis and Wood- Robinson, 2000; Marbach-Ad and Stavy, 2000; Wilson et al., 2006; Smith and Knight, 2012).”
A longitudinal approach to understanding course evaluations
Ludlow, L. (2005) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/pxzh-9q23 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
We must teach more effectively: here are four ways to get started
Dolan, E. L., & Collins, J. P. (2015) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e13-11-0675 · Cited by 59 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Instructors can support students in this process by providing them with opportunities to consider and refine their knowledge within scientific contexts (e.g., Handelsman et al., 2004; Haak et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2014; Dolan and Collins, 2015).”
Grotzer, T. A., & Mittlefehldt, S. (2011) · Contemporary trends and issues in science education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_5 · Cited by 52 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Further, the questions challenged students to consider the intelligibility, plausibility, and wide applicability of the concepts that were relevant to the assignments (Grotzer and Mittlefehldt, 2012) and thus were explicitly embedded in the conceptual framework underlying the study (Figure 1).”
InfluentialEffects of posting examinations and answer keys on students' study methods and test performance.
Lake, E., & Chambers, D. W. (2009) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.5.tb04735.x · Cited by 8 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Finally, some past work examining the practice of posting answers after an exam found no relationship with students’ test performance (Lake and Chambers, 2009).”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gall M. D. Gall J. P. Borg W. R. Educational research: An introduction 2007 8th ed.). Boston, MA Pearson Education
- Miles M. B. Huberman A. M. Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook 2014 3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA Sage
- Young A. Fry J. D. Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2008 8 2 1 10
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance
Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
“Providing students with answer keys that include explanations of the correct ideas and reflection questions can support students in evaluating their learning (Sabel et al. , 2017).”
BackgroundLuft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. E. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“Conducting a literature review, selecting a theoretical framework, and building a conceptual framework are some of the example of Sabel et al. (2017), the authors indicated there was a gap in the literature regarding how scaffolds engage students in metacognition to promote learning in large…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInstructor Strategies to Alleviate Stress and Anxiety among College and University STEM Students
Hsu, J. L., & Goldsmith, G. R. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-08-0189 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“Instructors may also choose to use “enhanced answer keys” with reflective metacognitive questions embedded to deliberately prompt student metacognition (Sabel et al., 2017).”
BackgroundOpportunities for Self-Evaluation Increase Student Calibration in an Introductory Biology Course
Osterhage, J. L., Usher, E. L., Douin, T. A., & Bailey, W. M. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-10-0202 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Instruction in the use of “enhanced answer keys,” which included explanations of correct answers, details about how questions were scored, and additional reflection questions designed to engage students in metacognition, resulted in significantly higher learning gains for students enrolled in an introductory biology c…”
BackgroundStanton, J. D., Dye, K. M., & Johnson, M. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-12-0239 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Other studies have shown that this type of instructor guidance can have an impact on the way students use learning strategies (Sabel et al., 2017).”
BackgroundGoudsouzian, L. K., & Hsu, J. L. (2023) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-10-0211 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Scaffolding—the breaking down of a complex concept or task into smaller parts that can be structured with guidance for students—is a common instructional strategy that can improve students’ self-regulation of learning and student learning outcomes in STEM (Belland, 2016; Offerdahl et al., 2017; Sabel et al., 2017; Ewe…”
BackgroundFeedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study
Gan, Z., Wei, W., & Yu, G. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2381227 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“For example, Sabel, Dauer, and Forbes (2017) used enhanced answers and reflection questions to promote biology students’ autonomous learning skills.”
Breland, H., Clark, C. M., Shaked, S., & Paquette‐Smith, M. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-08-0156 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Metacognitive growth has also been assessed in a variety of classroom settings (Kramarski and Mevarech, 1997; Miller and Geraci, 2011; Nietfeld et al., 2006; Callender et al., 2016; Sabel et al., 2017; Molin et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSupporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions
Hensley, L. C., Kulesza, A. E., Peri, J., Brady, A. C., Wolters, C. A., Sovic, D. M., & Breitenberger, C. A. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-03-0068 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“There has been a growing focus on understanding how to develop students’ metacognitive abilities to support success in college science courses (Cook et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2014; Stanton et al., 2015; Dye and Stanton, 2017; van Vliet et al., 2015; Sabel et al., 2017; Sebesta and Speth, 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialKnight, J. K., Weaver, D. C., Peffer, M. E., & Hazlett, Z. S. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-12-0341 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…post-exam analysis exercises (Williams et al., 2011; Mynlieff et al., 2014; Stanton et al., 2015), cues to check their answers in multiple circumstances (on practice problems, homework, and exams; McDonnell and Mullally, 2016), and using enhanced answer keys and reflections (Sabel et al., 2017).”
BackgroundA Comparison of Study Behaviors and Metacognitive Evaluation Used by Biology Students
Ewell, S. N., Driessen, E. P., Grogan, W., Johnston, Q., Ferdous, S., Mehari, Y., Peart, A., Seibenhener, M. L., & Ballen, C. J. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-11-0225 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“…resulted in improved self-evaluation skills and students reporting a shift from using study behaviors that emphasize rote memorization to those that promote conceptual understanding (Mynlieff et al. , 2014; Sabel et al. , 2017; Dang et al. , 2018; Muteti et al. , 2021; Santangelo et al. , 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-regulated learning: Overview and potential future directions in geoscience
Lukes, L., Jones, J. P., & McCONNELL, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2020.1820828 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Byrne, L. B., Rauschert, E. S. J., Rodgers, V. L., Bowser, G., Casper, A. M., Dewsbury, B. M., Morales, N. A., Vance‐Chalcraft, H. D., & Weber, L. M. (2025) · Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America · doi:10.1002/bes2.2233 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
PBLRQA model to the development of metacognitive awareness in pre-service teachers
Leasa, M., Rengkuan, M., & Batlolona, J. R. (2023) · Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) · doi:10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20977 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“To balance this factor, innovative strategies must be implemented to provide feedback on students' learning needs [25].”
BackgroundJusué, A. V., Alonso, A. T., Bilbao-González, A., & Palomares, T. (2021) · The journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators : JIAMSE · doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01188-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Student Perception of a Visual Novel for Fostering Science Process Skills
Wong, M., Al-Arnawoot, A., & Hass, K. (2022) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.32 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Brazeal, K. R., Brown, T. L., & Couch, B. A. (2021) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-021-00054-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Oknaryana, O., Zona, M. A., Marna, J. E., Hayati, A. F., Syofyan, R., Zulvia, Y., Kurniawan, H., & Murdy, K. (2025) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.14.4.1245 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Stanton, J. D., Halmo, S. M., Carter, R. J., Yamini, K. A., & Ososanya, D. (2024) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00053-24 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“For example, instructors can invite students to complete written reflections on the effectiveness of their study strategies immediately after completing an exam and seeing the grade they earned on the exam (7, 35).”
Hiscox, T. J., Papakonstantinou, T., & Rayner, G. M. (2022) · International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.30722/ijisme.30.04.002 · Cited by 7
Foster-Hartnett, D., Mwakalundwa, G., Bofenkamp, L., Patton, L., Nguyen, R., & Goodman-Mamula, P. (2022) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-01-0007 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In 2020, we used the CATME Web-based program (https:// info.catme.org) that evaluates teamwork by recording both (Mynlieff et al. 2014; Siegesmund, 2016; Sabel et al. , 2017).”
Dominguez, L. C., Mora, C. M., & Restrepo, J. (2021) · Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría · doi:10.1016/j.rcp.2021.07.007 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-regulated learning in STEM: non-academics matter
Azizi, M., & Dewsbury, B. (2025) · Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00166-25 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Existing research on self-reflection in biology largely treats it as an intervention (32) or focuses on affective responses (33), leaving a gap in understanding its broader function.”
Metacognitive Skills in Learning and Pedagogy: a Systematic Review and Analysis
Pandey, K., & Mohan, A. (2024) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340189 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Impact of Instructor Exam Feedback on Student Understanding in a Large-Enrollment Biology Course
Sato, B. K., Dinh-Dang, D., Cruz-Hinojoza, E., Denaro, K., Hill, C. F. C., & Williams, A. E. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy058 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Learning as a Skill to Be Learned: A Campus-Wide Framework to Support Student Learning and Success
Vecera, S. P., & Levtov, A. H. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15070931 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lo, I.-F., & Chen, C.-H. (2023) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2023.2209842 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Sabel, Dauer, and Forbes (2017) found that learning materials can help students’ multi-disciplinary cognition and conceptual understanding of biology.”
Using the FRAMER Scaffold Design Framework to Support Students in Learning & Understanding Biology
Sabel, J. L. (2020) · The American history teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2020.82.3.150 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationGibbons, R. E., Hokien, D., Hutson, B. L., & Maness, H. T. D. (2025) · Intersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning · doi:10.61669/001c.129036 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Students learn by using wrappers that their current study strategies may not be working and provide them with insights on how to improve in future semesters, potentially developing a growth mindset (Knight et al., 2022; Sabel et al., 2017).”
Aquino-Nunez, W., Scott, M. C. B., & Morgan, D. E. (2025) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00139-24 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Reflective assignments create a clear expectation for student engagement in metacogni tion, although students often require instructor support via consistent deadlines and grade incentives to remain engaged and complete such reflections (13).”
Implementation of the photovoice methodology in a project-based upper-division physics course
Oliver, K. A., Borish, V., Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. (2024) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010142 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Eight steps to facilitating more equitable education in undergraduate sciences
Lübeck, G., Seery, M., & Ryan, B. J. (2022) · The biochemist · doi:10.1042/bio_2022_123 · Cited by 2
Impact of Instructor Generated Guided Reading Questions for University Textbooks on Learning
Martin, E., & Kim, S. (2022) · Journal of College Reading and Learning · doi:10.1080/10790195.2022.2062489 · Cited by 2
“One method of fostering reflection, deeper engagement, and more active learning with any material, including reading textbooks, is by offering questions (Chickering & Gamson, 1987; Day et al., 2018b; Sabel et al., 2017).”
MethodEngineering Design Education Through a Data-Driven Course on Uncertainty
Ekwaro-Osire, S., Lopez-Salazar, C., Kalay, O., & Ajayi, O. D. (2026) · Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science · doi:10.1177/10920617251409397 · Cited by 1
“Building on it, a conceptual framework composed of three core frameworks, namely, (1) self-regulated learning, (2) metacognition, and (3) scaffolding (Sabel et al., 2017).”
Domínguez, L. C., Mora, C. M., & Restrepo, J. (2023) · Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría · doi:10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.07.008 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nonmajor Students’ Use of Reflection to Enhance Biology Understanding and Relevance
Thomas, N., Vo, T., & Sabel, J. L. (2023) · Journal of College Science Teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2023.12315866 · Cited by 1
Self-citationINSTRUMENTOS DE AVALIAÇÃO DO PENSAMENTO METACOGNITIVO ASSOCIADOS AO ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS
Boszko, C., da Rosa, C. T. W., & Delord, G. (2023) · Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências · doi:10.1590/1983-21172022240159 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…(Armstrong, Wallace & Chang, 2019; Dye & Stanton, 2017; Mayne, 2012; Nunaki, Damopolii, Kandowangko & Nusantari, 2019; Rahmat & Chanunan, 2018; Sabel, Dauer & Forbes, 2017; Stanton, Dye & Johnson, 2019; Trujillo, Anderson & Pelaez, 2016; Yumusaka, Sungurb & Cakiroglu, 2007; Wheeler &…”
BackgroundInfluentialTorres, H. L., Johnson-Ojeda, V., Hardy, M., & Frey, R. F. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1825440
Bergmann, A., & Knippels, M. P. J. (2026) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2026.2719536
Kohlwey, C. J., Johnson, J., Dhillon, S., & Kulesza, A. E. (2026) · Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00318-25
“Research has repeatedly shown that metacog nitive skills improve academic performance and promote lifelong learning habits (1, 2, 5–7).”
Metacognição e Ensino Superior
Portilho, E. M. L., & Brojato, H. C. (2021) · Linhas Criticas · doi:10.26512/lc.v27.2021.35444
Learning Philosophy Assignments as Metacognitive Instruction in Postsecondary Education
Haave, N. C., & Keus, K. (2019) · The National Teaching & Learning Forum · doi:10.1002/ntlf.30185
- Authors
- Sabel, J. L., Dauer, J. T., & Forbes, C. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Memphis (US)
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sabel, Jaime L.
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- ar40
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5589420
- OpenAlex
- W2699138449
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- metacognition, student self-regulation, scaffolds, reflective questions, feedback, introductory biology, student understanding, learning gains
- MeSH terms
- Metacognition, Biology, Feedback, Humans, Learning, Students, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review