Cited by 12Nursing care and researchPhysical Activity and HealthCancer survivorship and care

Exploring Gender Differences in Self-Reported Physical Activity and Health Among Older Caregivers

Cuthbert, Colleen, King-Shier, Kathryn, Tapp, Dianne, Ruether, Dean, Culos-Reed, S.·2017·Oncology Nursing Forum

Abstract

Purpose/objectives To document self-reported physical health and activity levels of older caregivers. Gender differences in physical health, physical activity levels, and predictors of physical activity were also examined. . Design A cross-sectional study. . Setting Tom Baker Cancer Centre in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. . Sample 130 caregivers aged 60 years or older caring for individuals with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer. . Methods Self-report survey including validated questionnaires on physical and mental health and physical activity levels. Convenience sampling was used. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlations, and multiple regression. . Main research variables The physical component score of the SF-36v2® was the main research variable. Other variables included the mental component score of the SF-36v2, sleep quality, depression, social support, physical activity levels, and anxiety. . Findings The mean age of caregivers was 70 years. Physical health and physical activity levels were higher than population norms. A significant difference in physical health (p = 0.015) existed between men and women but not in physical activity levels (p = 0.079). Predictors of physical activity levels were age (β = -0.291), physical health (β = 0.307), and caregiving hours per week (β = -0.221). . Conclusions The findings suggest that gender had a minimal effect on physical health and no effect on physical activity levels in older caregivers. Depression and po…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/17.onf.435-445

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuthbert, C., King-Shier, K., Tapp, D., Ruether, D., & Culos-Reed, S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Oncology Nursing Forum
Published
2017-07-01
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
435-445
ISSN
  • 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-0688
OpenAlex
W2610922966
Cited by
12
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
older caregivers, gender differences, physical activity, physical health, cancer caregivers, caregiver burden, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, social support, SF-36v2, predictors of physical activity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alberta, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Exercise, Caregivers, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review