Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional heterogeneity and differential priming of circulating neutrophils in human experimental endotoxemia

Pillay, Janesh, Ramakers, Bart P, Kamp, Vera M, Loi, Adele Lo Tam, Lam, Siu W, Hietbrink, Falco, Leenen, Luke P, Tool, Anton T, Pickkers, Peter, Koenderman, Leo·2010·Journal of Leukocyte Biology

Abstract

Systemic inflammation results in release of refractory neutrophils which can cause susceptibility to infections and activates differentiated neutrophils, which can mediate tissue damage. Neutrophils play an important role in host defense. However, deregulation of neutrophils contributes to tissue damage in severe systemic inflammation. In contrast to complications mediated by an overactive neutrophil compartment, severe systemic inflammation is a risk factor for development of immune suppression and as a result, infectious complications. The role of neutrophils in this clinical paradox is poorly understood, and in this study, we tested whether this paradox could be explained by distinct neutrophil subsets and their functionality. We studied the circulating neutrophil compartment immediately after induction of systemic inflammation by administering 2 ng/kg Escherichia coli LPS i.v. to healthy volunteers. Neutrophils were phenotyped by expression of membrane receptors visualized by flow cytometry, capacity to interact with fluorescently labeled microbes, and activation of the NADPH-oxidase by oxidation of Amplex Red and dihydrorhodamine. After induction of systemic inflammation, expression of membrane receptors on neutrophils, such as CXCR1 and -2 (IL-8Rs), C5aR, FcγRII, and TLR4, was decreased. Neutrophils were also refractory to fMLF-induced up-regulation of membrane receptors, and suppression of antimicrobial function was shown by decreased interaction with Staphylococcus epidermis. Simultaneously, activation of circulating neutrophils was demonstrated by a threefold increase in release of ROS. The paradoxical phenotype can be explained by the selective priming of the respiratory burst. In contrast, newly released, CD16dim banded neutrophils display decreased antimicrobial function. We conclude that systemic inflammation leads to a functionally heterogeneous neutrophil compartment, in which newly released refractory neutrophils can cause susceptibility to infections, and activated, differentiated neutrophils can mediate tissue damage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1189/jlb.1209793

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Pillay, J., Ramakers, B. P., Kamp, V. M., Loi, A. L. T., Lam, S. W., Hietbrink, F., Leenen, L. P., Tool, A. T., Pickkers, P., & Koenderman, L.
Venue
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
Published
2010-04-16
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
211-220
ISSN
  • 0741-5400 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3673
OpenAlex
W2108367388
Cited by
256
References
33
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional heterogeneity and differential priming of circulating neutrophils in human experimental endotoxemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1189/jlb.1209793
The paper
Pillay, J., Ramakers, B. P., Kamp, V. M., Loi, A. L. T., Lam, S. W., Hietbrink, F., Leenen, L. P., Tool, A. T., Pickkers, P., & Koenderman, L. (2010). Functional heterogeneity and differential priming of circulating neutrophils in human experimental endotoxemia. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1209793

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.