Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of Bobath on stroke patients at different motor stages by comparing their treatment with orthopaedic treatment. Design: A single-blind study, with random assignment to Bobath or orthopaedic group. Setting: Physical therapy department of a medical centre. Subjects: Twenty-one patients with stroke with spasticity and 23 patients with stroke at relative recovery stages participated. Interventions: Twenty sessions of Bobath programme or orthopaedic treatment programme given in four weeks. Main outcome measures: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) for impairment and functional limitation level. Results: Participants with spasticity showed greater improvement in tone control (change score: 1.209±1.03 versus 0.089±0.67, p =0.006), MAS (change score: 7.64±4.03 versus 4.009±1.95, p =0.011), and SIS (change score: 7.309±6.24 versus 1.259±5.33, p=0.023) after 20 sessions of Bobath treatment than with orthopaedic treatment. Participants with relative recovery receiving Bobath treatment showed greater improvement in MAS (change score: 6.149±5.55 versus 2.779±9.89, p=0.007), BBS (change score: 19.189±15.94 versus 6.859±5.23, p=0.015), and SIS scores (change score: 8.509±3.41 versus 3.629±4.07, p =0.006) than those with orthopaedic treatment. Conclusion: Bobath or orthopaedic treatment paired with spontaneous recovery resulted in improvements in impairment and functional levels for patient with stroke. Patients benefit more from the Bobath treatment in MAS and SIS scores than from the orthopaedic treatment programme regardless of their motor recovery stages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The intervention described as Bobath, with the exception of Wang et al, is often not recognizable as current Bobath practice.
“However, the intervention described as Bobath, with the exception of Wang et al, 45 is often not recognizable as current Bobath practice.”
From The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence? (2009) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument.
Berg, K., Wood-Dauphinée, S., Williams, J. I., & Maki, B. E. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 2,961 · see citing works
Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Shumway‐Cook, A., Baldwin, M., Polissar, N. L., & Gruber, W. C. (1997) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/77.8.812 · Cited by 1,593 · see citing works
International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps
Ford, B. (1984) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1984.tb103888.x · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps
&NA; (1980) · International Journal of Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.1097/00004356-198012000-00032 · Cited by 1,195 · see citing works
The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0
Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D. E., Embretson, S. E., & Laster, L. J. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131 · Cited by 1,180 · see citing works
Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment
Bobath, B. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 975 · see citing works
Investigation of a New Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients
Carr, J. H., Shepherd, R. B., Nordholm, L. A., & Lynne, D. (1985) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/65.2.175 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Movement therapy in hemiplegia : a neurophysiological approach
Brunnström, S., Hislop, H. J., & Carson, P. (1970) · Medical Dept., Harper & Row eBooks · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Asplund, K., Berman, P., Blomstrand, C., Dennis, M., Douglas, J., Erila, T., Garraway, M., Hamrin, E., Hankey, G., Ilmavirta, M., et al. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1151 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment
Atkinson, H. W. (1991) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(10)63589-4 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Langhammer, B., & Stanghelle, J. K. (2000) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215500cr338oa · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Dickstein, R., Hocherman, S., Pillar, T., & Shaham, R. (1986) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/66.8.1233 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Pollock, A., Baer, G. D., Pomeroy, V. M., & Langhorne, P. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001920.pub2 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Davies, P. M. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-96833-4 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients.
Logigian, M. K., Samuels, M. A., Falconer, J., & Zagar, R. J. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 148 · see citing works
WAGENAAR, R. C., Meijer, O. G., van Wieringen, P. C. W., Kuik, D. J., Hazenberg, G. J., Lindeboom, J., Wichers, F., & Rijswijk, H. (2020) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977902218 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Paci, M. (2003) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501970306106 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Functional Evaluation of Stroke Patients
(1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-68461-9 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Lennon, S., & Ashburn, A. (2000) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/096382800445461 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Gelber, D. A., Josefczyk, B., Herrman, D., Good, D. C., & Verhulst, S. J. (1995) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/154596839500900401 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Review article : Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of stroke: a review
Ashburn, A., Cj, P., & Souza, L. H. D. (1993) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/026921559300700410 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey
Lennon, S. (2003) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/0963828031000069744 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Pollock, A., Baer, G. D., Pomeroy, V. M., & Langhorne, P. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001920 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Functional movement reeducation.
Guymer, J. (1998) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.0800560a · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence?
Kollen, B. J., Lennon, S., Lyons, B., Wheatley-Smith, L., Scheper, M., Buurke, J. H., Halfens, J., Geurts, A. C. H., & Kwakkel, G. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.533828 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Effectiveness of the Bobath concept in the treatment of stroke:A systematic review
Díaz-Arribas, M. J., Martín-Casas, P., Cano-de-la-Cuerda, R., & Plaza-Manzano, G. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1590865 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
The Bobath Concept (NDT) as rehabilitation in stroke patients: A systematic review
Pathak, A., Gyanpuri, V., Dev, P., & Dhiman, N. R. (2021) · Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care · doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_528_21 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“2005[24] 44 patients 1 month N/A 21 patients in the BT group 23 in the Orthopaedic Approach SIAS, MAS1, BBS, SIS Bobath was superior.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialScrivener, K., Dorsch, S., McCluskey, A., Schurr, K., Graham, P. L., Cao, Z., Shepherd, R., & Tyson, S. (2020) · Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.008 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Brock, K., Haase, G., Rothacher, G., & Cotton, S. (2011) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215511406557 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, R.-Y., Chen, H.-I., Chen, C.-Y., & Yang, Y.-R.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming University (TW)
- Chang Gung University (TW)
- Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Department, Chung-Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
- Venue
- Clinical Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-164
- ISSN
- 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0873
- OpenAlex
- W2109392934
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- National Health Research Institutes
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- stroke, Bobath therapy, orthopaedic treatment, spasticity, relative recovery, stroke rehabilitation, motor impairment, balance, functional outcome, stroke impact
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Spasticity, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review