Cited by 70Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study

Wang, Ray-Yau, Chen, Hsiu-I, Chen, Chen-Yin, Yang, Yea-Ru·2005·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of Bobath on stroke patients at different motor stages by comparing their treatment with orthopaedic treatment. Design: A single-blind study, with random assignment to Bobath or orthopaedic group. Setting: Physical therapy department of a medical centre. Subjects: Twenty-one patients with stroke with spasticity and 23 patients with stroke at relative recovery stages participated. Interventions: Twenty sessions of Bobath programme or orthopaedic treatment programme given in four weeks. Main outcome measures: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) for impairment and functional limitation level. Results: Participants with spasticity showed greater improvement in tone control (change score: 1.209±1.03 versus 0.089±0.67, p =0.006), MAS (change score: 7.64±4.03 versus 4.009±1.95, p =0.011), and SIS (change score: 7.309±6.24 versus 1.259±5.33, p=0.023) after 20 sessions of Bobath treatment than with orthopaedic treatment. Participants with relative recovery receiving Bobath treatment showed greater improvement in MAS (change score: 6.149±5.55 versus 2.779±9.89, p=0.007), BBS (change score: 19.189±15.94 versus 6.859±5.23, p=0.015), and SIS scores (change score: 8.509±3.41 versus 3.629±4.07, p =0.006) than those with orthopaedic treatment. Conclusion: Bobath or orthopaedic treatment paired with spontaneous recovery resulted in improvements in impairment and functional levels for patient with stroke. Patients benefit more from the Bobath treatment in MAS and SIS scores than from the orthopaedic treatment programme regardless of their motor recovery stages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/0269215505cr850oa

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intervention described as Bobath, with the exception of Wang et al, is often not recognizable as current Bobath practice.

    “However, the intervention described as Bobath, with the exception of Wang et al, 45 is often not recognizable as current Bobath practice.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, R.-Y., Chen, H.-I., Chen, C.-Y., & Yang, Y.-R.
Affiliations
  • National Yang Ming University (TW)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Department, Chung-Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2005-03
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
155-164
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2109392934
Cited by
70
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Health Research Institutes
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
stroke, Bobath therapy, orthopaedic treatment, spasticity, relative recovery, stroke rehabilitation, motor impairment, balance, functional outcome, stroke impact
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Spasticity, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review