Cited by 56Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

Bobath therapy is inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions in improving lower limb activities after stroke:A systematic review

Open access
Scrivener, Katharine, Dorsch, Simone, McCluskey, Annie, Schurr, Karl, Graham, Petra L, Cao, Zheng, Shepherd, Roberta, Tyson, Sarah·2020·Journal of Physiotherapy

Abstract

QUESTION: In adults with stroke, does Bobath therapy improve lower limb activity performance, strength or co-ordination when compared with no intervention or another intervention? DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Adults after stroke. INTERVENTION: Bobath therapy compared with another intervention or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower limb activity performance (eg, sit to stand, walking, balance), lower limb strength and lower limb co-ordination. Trial quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. RESULTS: Twenty-two trials were included in the review and 17 in the meta-analyses. The methodological quality of the trials varied, with PEDro scale scores ranging from 2 to 8 out of 10. No trials compared Bobath therapy to no intervention. Meta-analyses estimated the effect of Bobath therapy on lower limb activities compared with other interventions, including: task-specific training (nine trials), combined interventions (four trials), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (one trial) and strength training (two trials). The pooled data indicated that task-specific training has a moderately greater benefit on lower limb activities than Bobath therapy (SMD 0.48), although the true magnitude of the benefit may be substantially larger or smaller than this estimate (95% CI 0.01 to 0.95). Bobath therapy did not clearly improve lower limb activities more than a combined intervention (SMD -0.06, 95% CI -0.73 to 0.61) or strength training (SMD 0.35, 95% CI -0.37 to 1.08). In one study, Bobath therapy was more effective than proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for improving standing balance (SMD -1.40, 95% CI -1.92 to -0.88), but these interventions did not differ on any other outcomes. Bobath therapy did not improve strength or co-ordination more than other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Bobath therapy was inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions, with the exception of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Prioritising Bobath therapy over other interventions is not supported by current evidence. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019112451.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.008

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another systematic review conducted in 2020 described that Bobath therapy is inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions in improving lower limb activities after stroke, with the exception of PNF technique.

    “Another systematic review[36] conducted in 2020, described that Bobath therapy is inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions in improving lower limb activities after stroke, with the exception of PNF technique.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schwarzer G. meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R News, 2007;7:40-45.
  2. Simsek TT, Cekok K. The effect of Nintendo Wii games on balance and upper extremity functions in patients with stroke. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2016;27:61-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scrivener, K., Dorsch, S., McCluskey, A., Schurr, K., Graham, P. L., Cao, Z., Shepherd, R., & Tyson, S.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Scrivener, Katharine
Venue
Journal of Physiotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
225-235
ISSN
1836-9553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093255746
Cited by
56
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of physiotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Macquarie University
  • University of Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
Bobath therapy, task-oriented training, stroke rehabilitation, lower limb function, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, resistance training, balance, lower limb strength, motor coordination, combined intervention
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Adult, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Walking, Stroke, Lower Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review