Cited by 52Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in family members of cancer victims: results from a longitudinal intervention study in Norway and Sweden

Ringdal, Gerd Inger, Ringdal, Kristen, Jordhøy, Marit S, Ahlner-Elmqvist, Marianne, Jannert, Magnus, Kaasa, Stein·2004·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

This study compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of family members of patients who participated in a program of palliative care (intervention family members) with those in conventional care (control family members). The HRQOL was measured by the short-form (SF-36) health survey questionnaire, including eight subscales. The longitudinal intervention study includes two sites: Trondheim, Norway and Malmø, Sweden. Our first hypothesis was that the HRQOL of the family members would deteriorate over time in the terminal phase and reach a low point a few months after the death of the patients, and thereafter gradually increase. This hypothesis was fully supported by the trajectories for the five scales, role limitation due to physical problems, vitality, social functioning, role limitation due to emotional problems, and mental health; but only partially so for the remaining three scales, physical functioning, bodily pain, and general health perception. From a second hypothesis, we expected the trajectories of the HRQOL scale scores for the two groups to show an increasing difference over time in quality of life in favor of the intervention group. This was the case for two of the scales: role limitation due to emotional problems and mental health. Before we may reach a definitive conclusion on the effects of palliative care programs for the HRQOL of family members, we need further longitudinal intervention studies with large samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/0269216304pm878oa

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Family caregivers of cancer patients exhibit high levels of stress and depression, lower subjective well-being, worse physical health, and higher mortality compared to non-caregivers.

    “Family caregivers of cancer patients exhibit high levels of stress and depression, lower subjective well-being, worse physical health, and higher mortality compared to non-caregivers [2–8, 19–25], yet few studies focus on improving outcomes for caregivers [26].”
  • The negative effects of caregiving, including a higher mortality rate, are most pronounced in caregivers of patients with advanced cancer, particularly when patients have a protracted disease course and are receiving palliative care.

    “Conversely, longer survival comes at a cost for caregivers: the negative effects of caregiving, including a higher mortality rate, are most pronounced in caregivers of patients with advanced cancer [2, 3, 20], particularly when patients have a protracted disease course [25] and are receiving palliative care [4, 21].”
  • Distress in caregivers contributes to distress in patients, in addition to negatively impacting the health of caregivers themselves, and likely other family members.

    “Distress in caregivers contributes to distress in patients [24], in addition to negatively impacting the health of caregivers themselves [2–4, 20, 21, 25], and likely other family members (e.g. many of our participants had young children).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringdal, G. I., Ringdal, K., Jordhøy, M. S., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Jannert, M., & Kaasa, S.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Unit of Applied Clinical Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
  • Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Malmø University Hospital, Malmø, Sweden
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2004-03
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
108-120
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2154656478
Cited by
52
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Kreftforeningen
  • Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
  • Norske Legeforening
  • Cancerfonden
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Sveriges Läkarförbund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
health-related quality of life, family caregivers, relatives of cancer patients, palliative care programs, caregiver burden, role limitations, mental health, SF-36, longitudinal trajectories, terminal phase
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Family Health, Family Relations, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Norway, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review