Cited by 517Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSubtitles and Audiovisual Media

Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a Lexical Approach to the test

Boers, Frank, Eyckmans, June, Kappel, Jenny, Stengers, Hélène, Demecheleer, Murielle·2006·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

This study reports a small-scale experiment that was set up to estimate the extent to which (i) the use of formulaic sequences (standardized phrases such as collocations and idiomatic expressions) can help learners come across as proficient L2 speakers and (ii) an instructional method that emphasizes ‘noticing’of L2 formulaic sequences can help language learners add such phrases to their linguistic repertoire. Participants were 32 college students majoring in English. Over the course of 22 teaching hours they were exposed to considerable quantities of authentic listening and reading materials. During exploration of those materials, the experimental students (N = 17) were made aware of standardized word combinations, while in the control group (N = 15) the traditional grammar-lexis dichotomy was upheld. Afterwards, the participants’ oral proficiency was gauged in an interview by two blind judges. Both perceived the experimental group as more proficient than the control group. Two other blind judges counted the number of word combinations in the interviews that they considered to be formulaic sequences. Their counts correlated well with the oral proficiency ratings, which suggests that helping learners build a repertoire of formulaic sequences can be a useful contribution to improving their oral proficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/1362168806lr195oa

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deliberate learning is effective for the learning of multiword units.

    “There is e v idence that deliberate learning is effecti v e for the learning of multiword units (Boers et al ., 2006).”

    From The Four Strands (2007) · cites this paper as Boers et al ., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Erasmus Brussels University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Boers, Frank
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2006-07
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
245-261
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2163322898
Cited by
506
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Keywords
formulaic language, collocations, idioms, lexical approach, noticing, second language speaking, English as a foreign language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review