The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference?
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of explicit grammar instruction on grammatical knowledge and writing proficiency in first-year students of French at a UK university. Previous research suggests that explicit grammar instruction results in gains in explicit knowledge and its application in specific grammar-related tasks, but there is less evidence that it results in gains in production tasks. A cohort of 12 students received a course in French grammar immediately prior to their university studies in order to determine whether a short but intensive burst of explicit instruction, a pedagogical approach hitherto unexamined in the literature, was sufficiently powerful to bring about an improvement in their grammatical knowledge and performance in production tasks. Participants were tested at three points over five months, and the results were compared with a group which did not receive the intervention. Our results support previous findings that explicit instruction leads to gains in some aspects of grammar tests but not gains in accuracy in either translation or free composition. Reasons for these findings are discussed in relation to theories of language development and the limitations of working memory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact, empirical studies that have used free-response data did not find explicit instruction to be more effective than implicit instruction (Macaro & Masterman, 2006;Piggott, 2019;Rousse-Malpat et al., 2019, Rousse-Malpat & Verspoor, 2012).”
From Long-term effects of explicit versus implicit instruction on EFL writing (2021) · cites this paper as Macaro & Masterman, 2006
In the citing paper
“our findings are in line with Macaro and Masterman (2006), which suggests that explicit instruction does not contribute to the diversity or complexity in the learners' expression.”
From Long-term effects of explicit versus implicit instruction on EFL writing (2021) · cites this paper as Macaro and Masterman (2006)
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 1×
“In a later investigation, Fotos (1993) found that both instructional approaches were equally effective in promoting subsequent ‘noticing’ (Schmidt, 1990) of targeted features of the language in written texts and developing longer term knowledge.”
BackgroundApproaches and Methods in Language Teaching
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667305 · Cited by 4,414
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569 · cited 4×
“Norris and Ortega (2000) concluded, from their meta-analysis of the relative effectiveness of different instructional approaches, that FonF and FonFS are both equally effective and durable.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study
Ellis, R. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050096 · Cited by 1,032
AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Ellis, N. C. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310505014x · Cited by 893 · cited 3×
“Grammatical knowledge that is acquired through subconscious processes is not necessarily the same knowledge that is applied intuitively when, for example, one is monitoring one’s own production.”
BackgroundDoughty, C. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100010287 · Cited by 619
Consciousness-Raising and the Second Language Learner
SMITH, M. S. (1981) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/2.2.159 · Cited by 380
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1177/136216889700100202 · DOI
- AQA, 2005, Qualifications and subjects
- Baddeley, A., 1986, Working memory
- Baddeley, A., 1997, Human memory: theory and practice
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00505.x · DOI
- Bautier-Castaing, E., 1977, Études de linguistique appliquée, 27, 19
- 10.1177/136216880100500202 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01053.x · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/3.3.181 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100012869 · DOI
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 · DOI · Paper page
- Cook, V., 2001, Second language learning and language teaching
- Doughty, C., 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00234.x · DOI
- 2004, Edexcel qualifications
- 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305
- 10.1093/applin/6.2.118 · DOI
- Ellis, R., 1990, Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Second Language Research Forum, 25
- 10.1093/applin/11.4.384 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100009931 · DOI
- Ellis, R., 1994, The study of second language acquisition
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x · DOI
- Elston, T., 1997, Génial
- 10.1093/applin/14.4.385 · DOI
- 10.2307/3587079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb01108.x · DOI
- Gass, S., 1994, Research methodology in second language acquisition, 303
- 10.1093/applin/13.2.168 · DOI
- 10.1177/136216889800200102 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/10.3.331 · DOI · Paper page
- Hulstijn, J., 1994, AILA Review, 11, 97
- 10.1080/09571739285200041 · DOI
- ILEA, 1979, Graded objectives for modern foreign languages
- 10.1080/09571739785200231 · DOI
- 10.1080/09571739885200211 · DOI
- 10.1191/1362168803lr128oa · DOI
- Krashen, S., 1982, Principles and practice in second language learning and acquisition
- Krashen, S. D., 1985, The input hypothesis: issues and implications
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00264.x · DOI · Paper page
- Leow, R., 1996, Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics 1996, 126
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/applin/4.2.126 · DOI
- 10.1080/0305498042000303964 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x · DOI
- McLagan, P., 1994, Grammar! A conference report, 69
- McLaughlin, B., 1987, Theories of second language learning
- 10.1177/136216880000400104 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230511804 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb01318.x · DOI
- Marsden, R., 1999, Deutsch: Lehren und Lernen, 19, 15
- 10.1080/09571739885200041 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/21.3.281 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100005015 · DOI · Paper page
- Prabhu, N. S., 1987, Second language pedagogy
- Rivers, W. M., 1983, Communicating naturally in a second language: theory and practice in language teaching
- 10.1017/S0272263100014674 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05303.x · DOI
- Sharwood-Smith, M., 1994, Second language learning: theoretical foundations
- Sheppard, R., 1993, German Teaching, 8, 3
- Skehan, P., 1998, A cognitive approach to language learning
- Soars, J., 1987, Headway
- 10.1111/0026-7902.00002 · DOI
- Swain, M., 1985, Input and second language acquisition, 235
- Tarone, E., 1988, Variation in interlanguage
- VanPatten, B., 1996, Input processing and grammar instruction
- 10.1017/S0272263100011979 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/8.2.95 · DOI
- Widdowson, H. G., 1978, Teaching language as communication
- 10.1080/09571739985200071 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long-term effects of explicit versus implicit instruction on EFL writing
Ke, H., Luo, Y., Piggott, L., & Steinkrauss, R. (2021) · Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.51751/dujal9361 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Macaro, E., & Masterman, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford, UK,
- University of Oxford, UK
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-327
- ISSN
- 1362-1688
- 1477-0954
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review