Cited by 69Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Ketamine and psychotherapy for the treatment of psychiatric disorders: Systematic review

Open access
Kew, Bess M., Porter, Richard J., Douglas, Katie M., Glue, Paul, Mentzel, Charlotte L., Beaglehole, Ben·2023·BJPsych Open

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ketamine is an effective short-term treatment for a range of psychiatric disorders. A key question is whether the addition of psychotherapy to ketamine treatment improves outcomes or delays relapse. AIM: To identify all studies combining psychotherapy with ketamine for the treatment of psychiatric disorders to summarise their effects and make recommendations for future research. METHOD: The review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022318120). Potential studies were searched for in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, the Cochrane library and Google Scholar. Eligible studies combined ketamine and psychotherapy for the treatment of psychiatric disorders and did not use case reports or qualitative designs. Key findings relating to psychotherapy type, diagnosis, ketamine protocol, sequencing of psychotherapy and study design are reported. Risk of bias was assessed using modified Joanna Briggs critical appraisal tools. RESULTS: Nineteen studies evaluating 1006 patients were included in the systematic review. A variety of supportive individual and group, manualised and non-manualised psychotherapies were used. The majority of studies evaluated substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and treatment-resistant depression. Ketamine protocols and sequencing of ketamine/psychotherapy treatment varied substantially between studies. Outcomes were largely positive for the addition of psychotherapy to ketamine treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of psychotherapy and ketamine offers promise for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, but study heterogeneity prevents definitive recommendations for their integration. Larger randomised controlled trials using manualised psychotherapies and standardised ketamine protocols are recommended to clarify the extent to which the addition of psychotherapy to ketamine improves outcomes over ketamine treatment alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2023.53

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence suggests that the future may lie in integrative models, combining fast-acting agents (e.g., ketamine, buprenorphine) with structured psychotherapeutic work on meaning and tolerability.

    “The evidence suggests that the future may lie in integrative models, combining fast-acting agents (e.g., ketamine, buprenorphine) with structured psychotherapeutic work on meaning and tolerability [79].”

    From Targeting Psychological Pain After a Suicide Attempt: Scoping Review and Intervention Protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) says combining ketamine with psychotherapy offers promise and recommends further trials using manualised psychotherapies. The cited review does not establish the same approach for buprenorphine or specifically describe psychotherapy as work on meaning and tolerability; it also says heterogeneity prevents definitive recommendations for integration. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence Systematic Review Software. Veritas Health Innovation, 2022 (www.covidence.org).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kew, B. M., Porter, R. J., Douglas, K. M., Glue, P., Mentzel, C. L., & Beaglehole, B.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Beaglehole, Ben
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2023-05
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e79-e79
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367668878
Cited by
69
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
ketamine, psychotherapy, combination therapy, mental illness, substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, treatment-resistant depression, relapse prevention, treatment sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review