Cited by 378Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Research Topics

Brief scale for measuring the outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA)

Gowers, Simon G., Harrington, Richard C., Whitton, Anna, Lelliott, Paul, Beevor, Anne, Wing, John, Jezzard, Robert·1999·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Following the development of a child and adolescent version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOSCA), field trials were conducted to assess their feasibility and acceptability in routine outcome measurement. Aims To evaluate the reliability, validity and acceptability of HoNOSCA in routine outcome measurement. Method Following training, 36 field sites provided ratings on 1276 cases at one time point and outcome data on 906. Acceptability was assessed by way of written feedback and at a debriefing meeting. Results HoNOSCA demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity characteristics. It was sensitive to change and its ability to measure change accorded with the clinicians' independent rating. HoNOSCA was reasonably acceptable to clinicians' from a range of disciplines and services. Conclusions Provided that training needs can be met, HoNOSCA represents a satisfactory brief outcome measure which could be used routinely in child and adolescent mental health services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.174.5.413

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gowers, S. G., Harrington, R. C., Whitton, A., Lelliott, P., Beevor, A., Wing, J., & Jezzard, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Royal College of Psychiatrists (GB)
  • Department of Health and Social Care (GB)
Corresponding author
Gowers, Simon G.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1999-05
Volume
174
Issue
5
Pages
413-416
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2105777624
Cited by
378
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 25
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
HoNOSCA, Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, routine outcome measurement, emotional and behavioural disorders, child and adolescent mental health, outcome measure validity, clinician acceptability, sensitivity to change
MeSH terms
Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Female, United Kingdom, Health Status, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity, Observer Variation, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review