Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tokophobia: An unreasoning dread of childbirth: A series of 26 cases

Hofberg, Kristina, Brockington, Ian·2000·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Some women dread and avoid childbirth despite desperately wanting a baby. This is called tokophobia. Aims: To classify tokophobia for the first time in the medical literature. Method: Twenty-six women noted to have an unreasoning dread of childbirth were interviewed by the same psychiatrist, who was not the treating doctor. A qualitative analysis of these psychiatric interviews was performed. Results: Phobic avoidance of pregnancy may date from adolescence (primary tokophobia), be secondary to atraumatic delivery (secondary tokophobia) or be a symptom of prenatal depression (tokophobia as a symptom of depression). Pregnant women with tokophobia who were refused their choice of delivery method suffered higher rates of psychological morbidity than those who achieved their desired delivery method. Conclusions: Tokophobia is a specific and harrowing condition that needs acknowledging. Close liaison between the obstetrician and the psychiatrist in order to assess the balance between surgical and psychiatric morbidity is imperative with tokophobia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.176.1.83

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 1992, The Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
  2. 10.3109/00016349709024365 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00006842-197503000-00004 · DOI
  4. Marce, 1858, Traite de la Folie des Fernmes Enceintes, des Nouvelles Accouchees et des Nourrices
  5. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01358.x · DOI
  6. Ekblad, 1961, The prognosis after sterilization on social–psychiatric grounds. A follow-up study on 225 women, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 37, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hofberg, K., & Brockington, I.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-01
Volume
176
Issue
1
Pages
83-85
ISSN
  • 0007-1250
  • 1472-1465
Cited by
238
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review