Cited by 131Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical research

Therapeutic group psychoeducation and relaxation in treating fear of childbirth

SAISTO, TERHI, TOIVANEN, RIIKKA, SALMELA‐ARO, KATARIINA, HALMESMÄKI, ERJA·2006·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background. The increase in the numbers of women fearing childbirth and requesting cesarean sections call for new forms of antenatal treatment. Methods. Finnish nulliparous women experiencing severe fear of childbirth (experimental group, n = 102) attended 5 group sessions with a psychologist, once together with a midwife, during the third trimester. One session was held 3 months after the delivery. Each session consisted of a discussion of fear and feelings towards the impending birth and parenthood in a psychotherapeutic atmosphere and of relaxation exercises focused on an imaginary childbirth. The results were compared with those of 85 women treated for fear of childbirth by 2 appointments with an obstetrician (conventional treatment). Results. Before the sessions, among the women in the experimental group, scored fear of childbirth, on a scale of one to ten, was 6.9±2.0 (SD), which is similar to the score of those receiving conventional treatment (6.0±1.6). After the sessions, 84 women in the experimental group (82.4%) and 57 in the conventional treatment group (67.1%) chose to have a vaginal delivery (p = 0.02). The women in the experimental treatment group rated the helpfulness of the sessions 8.5±1.6 on a scale where 10 was maximum help and 1 no help at all, and mentioned “sharing their feelings” twice as often as “receiving information” as the most helpful factor in relieving fear. Conclusions. Group psychoeducation and relaxation exercises were well received and rated as very helpful. More cesarean section requests were withdrawn than in the comparison group and in previous studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00016340600756920

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SAISTO, T., TOIVANEN, R., SALMELA‐ARO, K., & HALMESMÄKI, E.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
SAISTO, TERHI
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
1315-1319
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2162139610
Cited by
131
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
fear of childbirth, group psychoeducation, relaxation techniques, fetal therapy, nulliparous women, vaginal delivery, cesarean section, third trimester
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Fear, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Psychotherapy, Group, Relaxation Therapy, Parturition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review