Cited by 89Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical research

Secondary fear of childbirth prolongs the time to subsequent delivery

Open access
SYDSJÖ, GUNILLA, ANGERBJÖRN, LOUISE, PALMQUIST, SOFIE, BLADH, MARIE, SYDSJÖ, ADAM, JOSEFSSON, ANN·2013·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective. Most pregnant women are anxious about the delivery and up to 30% develop varying degrees of fear of childbirth (FOC). Secondary FOC occurs in parous women who have experienced a traumatic delivery. The aim of this study was to investigate the time to subsequent delivery and delivery outcome in women with secondary FOC, compared with a reference group. Setting. Southeast Sweden. Sample. 356 parous pregnant women with secondary FOC and a reference group of 634 parous women without FOC. Design. Descriptive, retrospective case–control study. Main outcome measures. Time to next pregnancy and delivery outcome. Results. More women with secondary FOC had a longer interval to subsequent delivery compared with parous women without FOC (p = 0.005). Women with secondary FOC had 5.2 times higher probability of having a cesarean section than the reference group. Women with secondary FOC also had on average a 40‐minute longer duration of active labor than women without FOC (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Secondary fear of childbirth prolongs the time to subsequent delivery and the active phase of labor itself, and increases the risk for cesarean section.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.12034

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SYDSJÖ, G., ANGERBJÖRN, L., PALMQUIST, S., BLADH, M., SYDSJÖ, A., & JOSEFSSON, A.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
SYDSJÖ, GUNILLA
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-05
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
210-214
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2152943500
Cited by
89
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
fear of childbirth, parous women, cesarean section, delivery outcomes, interpregnancy interval, traumatic delivery
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Cesarean Section, Fear, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Labor, Induced, Mothers, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Sweden, Time Factors, Parturition, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review