The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures: National survey
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reluctancy on the use of technical equipment, financial support, time disposal, apprehension about the ecological validity of measures, perceiving measurement as a way of control, or concerns about data security contribute to the hesitant reception of measurement in clinical practice.
“For instance, reluctancy on the use of technical equipment, financial support, time disposal, apprehension about the ecological validity of measures (e.g., thinking that empirical findings do not reflect their everyday practice; Boswell et al., 2015;Gilbody et al., 2002), perceiving measurement as a way of control, or concerns about data security (de Jong & de Goede, 2015;Mütze et al., 2022).”
From Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator (2022) · cites this paper as Gilbody et al., 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · DOI · Paper page
- Wing, 1994, Outcomes into Clinical Practice, 147
- 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · DOI · Paper page
- Mayfield, 1974, The CAGE questionnaire, American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 1121, 10.1176/ajp.131.10.1121 · DOI
- 1999, National Service Framework – Mental Health
- 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.322.7283.406 · DOI
- Curtis, 1995, Measurement for Mental Health: Contributions from the College Research Unit, 33
- Nutley, 1998, League tables for performance improvement in health care, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 3, 50, 10.1177/135581969800300111 · DOI
- 10.1192/pb.16.6.329 · DOI
- 1991, The Health of the Nation: A Strategy for England
- Glover, 1997, The development of a new minimum data set for specialist mental health care, Health Trends, 29, 48
- 1998, Modernising Mental Health Services: Safe, Sound and Supportive
- 10.1007/s001270050139 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Gilbody, 2001a, The Cochrane Library – Issue I
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2010) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006 · Cited by 4,057
Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review
Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M., Puspitasari, A., Navarro, E., Howard, J., Kassab, H., Hoffman, M., Scott, K., Lyon, A., Douglas, S., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329 · Cited by 605
Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions
Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696 · Cited by 494
Holländare, F., Andersson, G., & Engström, I. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1392 · Cited by 179
Selecting outcome measures in mental health: the views of service users
Crawford, M. J., Robotham, D., Thana, L., Patterson, S., Weaver, T., Barber, R., Wykes, T., & Rose, D. (2011) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.577114 · Cited by 172
Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: Randomised controlled trial
Slade, M., McCrone, P., Kuipers, E., Leese, M., Cahill, S., Parabiaghi, A., Priebe, S., & Thornicroft, G. (2006) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015412 · Cited by 147
Yeung, A. S., Jing, Y., Brenneman, S. K., Chang, T. E., Baer, L., Hebden, T., Kalsekar, I., McQuade, R. D., Kurlander, J., Siebenaler, J., et al. (2012) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.21983 · Cited by 74
Andreas, S., Harfst, T., Dirmaier, J., Kawski, S., Koch, U., & Schulz, H. (2007) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000098492 · Cited by 48
Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator
Moggia, D., Schaffrath, J., Bommer, J., Weinmann-Lutz, B., & Lutz, W. (2022) · Revista de Psicoterapia · doi:10.33898/rdp.v33i123.35971 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbody, S. M., House, A. O., & Sheldon, T. A.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-103
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2214359641
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- outcome measures, psychiatrists, clinical practice, mental health services
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, United Kingdom, Health Services Research, Humans, Medical Audit, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires, State Medicine, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health Care Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
