Cited by 179Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSurvey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

A comparison of psychometric properties between internet and paper versions of two depression instruments (BDI-II and MADRS-S) administered to clinic patients

Open access
Holländare, Fredrik, Andersson, Gerhard, Engström, Ingemar·2010·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-report measures can guide clinical decisions and are useful when evaluating treatment outcomes. However, many clinicians do not use self-report measures systematically in their clinical practice. Internet-based questionnaires could facilitate administration, but the psychometric properties of the online version of an instrument should be explored before implementation. The recommendation from the International Test Commission is to test the psychometric properties of each questionnaire separately. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the psychometric properties of paper-and-pencil versions and Internet versions of two questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms. METHODS: The 87 participating patients were recruited from primary care and psychiatric care within the public health care system in Sweden. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-rated (MADRS-S), both on paper and on the Internet. The order was randomized to control for order effects. Symptom severity in the sample ranged from mild to severe depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Psychometric properties of the two administration formats were mostly equivalent. The internal consistency was similar for the Internet and paper versions, and significant correlations were found between the formats for both MADRS-S (r = .84) and the BDI-II (r = .89). Differences between paper and Internet total scores were not statistically significant for either questionnaire nor for the MADRS-S question dealing with suicidality (item 9) when analyzed separately. The score on the BDI-II question about suicidality (item 9) was significantly lower when administered via the Internet compared with the paper score, but the difference was small (effect size, Cohen's [d] = 0.14). There were significant main effects for order of administration on both questionnaires and significant interaction effects between format and order. This should not, however, pose a problem in clinical use as long as the administration format is not changed when repeated measurements are made. CONCLUSIONS: The MADRS-S can be transferred to online use without affecting the psychometric properties in a clinically meaningful way. The full BDI-II also seems to retain its properties when transferred; however, the item measuring suicidality in the Internet version needs further investigation since it was associated with a lower score in this study. The use of online questionnaires offers clinicians a more practical way of measuring depressive symptoms and has the potential to save resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1392

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Holländare F Askerlund A Nieminen A Engström I Can the BDI-II and MADRS-S be Transferred to Online Use Without Affecting their Psychometric Properties? E-Journal of Applied Psychology 2008 4 2 63 65
  2. [18]Beck AT Steer RA Brown GK BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory - second edition. Manual (Swedish version) 2005 Sandviken, Sweden Psykologiförlaget

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holländare, F., Andersson, G., & Engström, I.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Holländare, Fredrik
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2010-12-19
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
e49
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029775242
Cited by
179
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
internet-based questionnaire, paper-and-pencil administration, psychometric properties, Beck Depression Inventory-II, depressive symptoms, suicidality, order effects, self-report measures, depression assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychiatry, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Reproducibility of Results, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review