The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Instability of eating disorder diagnoses: prospective study
Open accessAbstract
Background: The stability of eating disorder diagnoses has received little research attention. Aims: To examine the course of the full range of clinical eating disorders. Method: A sample of 192 women with a current DSM–IV eating disorder (55 with anorexia nervosa, 108 with bulimia nervosa and 29 with eating disorder not otherwise specified) were assessed three times over 30 months using a standardised interview. Results: Although the overarching category of ‘eating disorder’ was relatively stable, the stability of the three specific eating disorder diagnoses was low, with just a third of participants retaining their original diagnosis. This was due only in part to remission since the remission rate was low across all three diagnoses. Conclusions: There is considerable diagnostic flux within the eating disorders but a low overall remission rate. This suggests that underpinning their psychopathology may be common biological and psychological causal and maintaining processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a “transdiagnostic” theory and treatment
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & Shafran, R. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00088-8 · Cited by 3,374
Self-citationMedial prefrontal cortex activity associated with symptom provocation in eating disorders
Uher, R., Murphy, T., Brammer, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Phillips, M. L., Ng, V. W., Andrew, C. M., Williams, S. C. R., Campbell, I. C., & Treasure, J. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1238 · Cited by 452
Application of a Latent Class Analysis to Empirically Define EatingDisorder Phenotypes
Keel, P. K., Fichter, M., Quadflieg, N., Bulik, C. M., Baxter, M. G., Thornton, L., Halmi, K. A., Kaplan, A. S., Strober, M., Woodside, D. B., et al. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.2.192 · Cited by 181
Cited by
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., & Rohde, P. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030679 · Cited by 822
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., & Durant, S. (2011) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.009 · Cited by 611
Diagnostic Crossover in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa: Implications for DSM-V
Eddy, K. T., Dorer, D. J., Franko, D. L., Tahilani, K., Thompson-Brenner, H., & Herzog, D. B. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060951 · Cited by 535
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., Shaw, H., & Jaconis, M. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016481 · Cited by 529
Fairburn, C. G., & Bohn, K. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.011 · Cited by 496
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Milos, G., Spindler, A., Schnyder, U., & Fairburn, C. G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 573-578
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W1988778283
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
