Cited by 611Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Risk factors for onset of eating disorders: evidence of multiple risk pathways from an 8-year prospective study

Open access
Stice, Eric, Marti, C. Nathan, Durant, Shelley·2011·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Objective Use classification tree analysis with lagged predictors to determine empirically derived cut-points for identifying adolescent girls at risk for future onset of threshold, subthreshold, and partial eating disorders and test for interactions between risk factors that may implicate qualitatively distinct risk pathways.Method Data were drawn from a prospective study of 496 adolescent girls who completed diagnostic interviews and surveys annually for 8 years.Results Body dissatisfaction emerged as the most potent predictor; adolescent girls in the upper 24% of body dissatisfaction showed a 4.0-fold increased incidence of eating disorder onset (24% vs. 6%). Among participants in the high body dissatisfaction branch, those in the upper 32% of depressive symptoms showed a 2.9-fold increased incidence of onset (43% vs. 15%). Among participants in the low body dissatisfaction branch, those in the upper 12% of dieting showed a 3.6-fold increased incidence onset (18% vs. 5%).Conclusion This three-way interaction suggests a body dissatisfaction pathway to eating disorder onset that is amplified by depressive symptoms, as well as a pathway characterized by self-reported dieting among young women who are more satisfied with their bodies. It may be possible to increase the effectiveness of prevention programs by targeting each of these qualitatively distinct risk groups, rather than only individuals with a single risk factor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.009

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stice et al. (2011) found amplification effects (interactions) between high body dissatisfaction and high depressive symptoms, as well as low body dissatisfaction and high self-reported dieting, leading to increased risk of developing eating disorders.

    “They found amplification effects (interactions) between high body dissatisfaction and high depressive symptoms, as well as low body dissatisfaction and high self-reported dieting, leading to increased risk of developing eating disorders.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hothorn T Hornik K Zeileis A 2006 Unbiased recursive partitioning Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15 3 651 674

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., & Durant, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Stice, Eric
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
49
Issue
10
Pages
622-627
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090523262
Cited by
611
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
29.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH/DK61957)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
eating disorders, risk factors, adolescent girls, body dissatisfaction, depressive symptoms, dieting, RISK pathway, subthreshold eating disorders, eating disorder prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Decision Trees, Depression, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Psychological, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Caloric Restriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review