Cited by 20Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

Economic evaluation of mindfulness group therapy for patients with depression, anxiety, stress and adjustment disorders compared with treatment as usual

Open access
Saha, Sanjib, Jarl, Johan, Gerdtham, Ulf-G, Sundquist, Kristina, Sundquist, Jan·2020·The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: A randomised controlled trial found that a structured mindfulness group therapy (MGT) programme was as effective as treatment as usual (mostly cognitive–behavioural therapy) for patients with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or stress and adjustment disorders in Sweden (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01476371). Aims: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of MGT compared with treatment as usual from both a healthcare and a societal perspective for the trial duration (8 weeks). Method: The costs from a healthcare perspective included treatment as usual, medication and costs for providing MGT. The societal perspective included costs from the healthcare perspective plus savings from productivity gains for the trial duration. The effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the UK value set. Uncertainty surrounding the incremental costs and effects were estimated using non-parametric bootstrapping with 5000 replications and presented with 95% confidence intervals and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results: The MGT group had significantly lower healthcare and societal costs (mean differences –€115 (95% CI −193 to −36) and –€112 (95% CI −207 to −17), respectively) compared with the control group. In terms of effectiveness, there was no significant difference in QALY gain (mean difference −0.003, 95% CI −0.0076 to 0.0012) between the two groups. Conclusions: MGT is a cost-saving alternative to treatment as usual over the trial duration from both a healthcare and a societal perspective for patients with a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or stress and adjustment disorders in Sweden.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2018.247

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sundquist's study in Sweden showed that mindfulness is a cost-effective alternative to standard treatment for patients with depression, anxiety, or stress and adjustment disorders in general practice.

    “This aligns with Sundquist’s study in Sweden, which showed that mindfulness is a cost-effective alternative to standard treatment for patients with depression, anxiety, or stress and adjustment disorders in general practice [56].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ 1997; 6: 327-40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saha, S., Jarl, J., Gerdtham, U.-G., Sundquist, K., & Sundquist, J.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Shimane University (JP)
Corresponding author
Saha, Sanjib
Venue
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-11-23
Volume
216
Issue
4
Pages
197-203
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2900786286
Cited by
20
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet (2014-10134, 2018-02400)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cost-effectiveness, depression, anxiety, stress, adjustment disorder, quality-adjusted life years, social costs, productivity improvement, usual care, cognitive behavioral therapy, EQ-5D-5L
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Group, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Health Care Costs, Cost of Illness, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review