Cited by 156Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Comparison of brief dynamic and cognitive-behavioural therapies in avoidant personality disorder

Open access
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G., Benner, Ank, Kuipers, Antoinette, Feiertag, Guus A., Koster, Harrie C., van Apeldoorn, Franske J.·2006·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of controlled trials examining the effectiveness of individual psychotherapy in personality disorders, especially in patients with cluster C disorders. Aims: To compare the effectiveness of brief dynamic therapy and cognitive–behavioural therapy as out-patient treatment for people with avoidant personality disorder. Method: Patients who met the criteria for avoidant personality disorder ( n =62) were randomly assigned to 20 weekly sessions of either brief dynamic therapy ( n =23) or cognitive–behavioural therapy ( n =21), or they were assigned to the waiting-list control group ( n =18). After the waiting period, patients in the control group were randomly assigned to one of the two therapies. Results: Patients who received cognitive–behavioural therapy showed significantly more improvements on a number of measures in comparison with those who had brief dynamic psychotherapy or were in the waiting-list control group. Results were maintained at follow-up. Conclusions: Cognitive–behavioural therapy is more effective than waiting-list control and brief dynamic therapy. Brief dynamic therapy was no better than the waiting-list control condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.012153

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Benner, A., Kuipers, A., Feiertag, G. A., Koster, H. C., & van Apeldoorn, F. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord (NL)
Corresponding author
Emmelkamp, Paul M. G.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-07
Volume
189
Issue
1
Pages
60-64
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2123253697
Cited by
156
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
avoidant personality disorder, brief psychodynamic psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, individual psychotherapy, cluster C personality disorders, outpatient care, treatment effectiveness, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Brief, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review