Cited by 20Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and Psychology

Pre‐treatment predictors and in‐treatment factors associated with change in avoidant and dependent personality disorder traits among patients with social phobia

Borge, Finn‐Magnus, Hoffart, Asle, Sexton, Harold, Martinsen, Egil, Gude, Tore, Hedley, Liv Margaret, Abrahamsen, Gun·2010·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

We examined changes in avoidant and dependent personality disorder dimensions, and pre‐treatment and in‐treatment factors associated with such changes in 77 patients, randomized to medication‐free residential cognitive (CT) or residential interpersonal therapy for social phobia. Personality disorders and personality dimensions according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM‐IV) were assessed at pre‐treatment and at one‐year post‐treatment. Both treatments were associated with a decrease in avoidant and dependent personality dimensions; dependent dimension decreased more in CT. Changes in cognitive factors predicted changes in both personality dimensions, whereas changes in symptoms or interpersonal factors did not. Change in the cognitive factor estimated cost was the most powerful predictor in the avoidant dimension, as it was the only predictor that remained significant in the forward regression analyses. Change in the cognitive factor estimated cost, and treatment were the most powerful predictors of change in the dependent dimension. Pre‐treatment use of anxiolytics predicted larger changes in both PD dimensions. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: • Improvement in symptoms and cognitions related to social phobia is associated with improvement in dependent and avoidant personality disorder traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.640

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borge, F., Hoffart, A., Sexton, H., Martinsen, E., Gude, T., Hedley, L. M., & Abrahamsen, G.
Affiliations
  • Modum Bad – Gordon Johnsens stiftelse (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Akershus University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Borge, Finn‐Magnus
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-23
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
87-99
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W2086435716
Cited by
20
References
50
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, avoidant personality disorder, dependent personality disorder, personality disorder traits, cognitive therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, residential treatment, cost of living, anxiolytic use, personality factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Dependent Personality Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Personality Disorders, Phobic Disorders, Premedication, Prognosis, Psychotherapy, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review