Cited by 520Child Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

Psychiatric disorder among British children looked after by local authorities: Comparison with children living in private households

Open access
Ford, Tamsin, Vostanis, Panos, Meltzer, Howard, Goodman, Robert·2007·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Children looked after by local authorities are at higher risk of poor psychosocial outcomes than children living in private households, but nationally representative and random samples of the two groups of children have not previously been compared. Aims: To find explanations for the increased prevalence of psychiatric disorder in children looked after by local authorities. Method: We examined socio-demographic characteristics and psychopathology by type of placement among children looked after in Britain by local authorities ( n = 1453), and compared these children with deprived and non-deprived children living in private households ( n = 10 428). Results: Children looked after by local authorities had higher levels of psychopathology, educational difficulties and neurodevelopmental disorders, and ‘looked after’ status was independently associated with nearly all types of psychiatric disorder after adjusting for these educational and physical factors. The prevalence of psychiatric disorder was particularly high among those living in residential care and with many recent changes of placement. Conclusions: Our findings indicate a need for greater support of this vulnerable group of children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025023

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of mental health problems in foster children estimated by symptom checklists is in the range of 42.7% to 61.0%.

    “The prevalence of mental health problems in foster children has primarily been investigated using symptom checklists, providing an overall estimated prevalence of mental health problems in the range of 42.7% to 61.0% [6-11].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, T., Vostanis, P., Meltzer, H., & Goodman, R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Ford, Tamsin
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-04
Volume
190
Issue
4
Pages
319-325
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1980772304
Cited by
520
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 31
FWCI
31.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
children in care, child psychopathology, child welfare, residential care, placement changes, academic difficulties, neurodevelopmental disorders, deprivation, private households, psychopathology, child mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Family Characteristics, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Social Welfare, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence, Orphanages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review