Cited by 108Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions for people bereaved through suicide: systematic review

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Promoting the mental health of people bereaved through suicide is a key aim of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of interventions to support people bereaved through suicide. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review of data from controlled studies of interventions for people bereaved through suicide. Studies were identified using systematic searches, the methodological quality of included studies was assessed and narrative synthesis conducted. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified. None was UK-based and all but one study had substantial methodological limitations. When compared with no intervention, there was evidence of some benefit from single studies of a cognitive-behavioural family intervention of four sessions with a psychiatric nurse; a psychologist-led 10-week bereavement group intervention for children; and 8-week group therapy for adults delivered by a mental health professional and volunteer. The findings from studies comparing two or more active interventions were more equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is evidence of some benefit from interventions for people bereaved by suicide, this is not robust. Further methodologically sound evidence is required to confirm whether interventions are helpful and, if so, for whom.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040824

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Seguin, 2004, Evaluation de programmes de postvention [Evaluation of four suicide bereavement programs], Rev Fr Psychiat Psychol Med, 8, 17
  2. 2003, Dictionary for the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.
  3. Popay, 2005, Developing guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews, J Epidemiol Community Health, 59, A7
  4. 2001, Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD Guidelines For Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews
  5. 2006, Mental Health: Suicide Prevention (SUPRE).
  6. 2006, National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England: Annual Report on Progress 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–108 of 108

Metadata

Authors
McDaid, C., Trowman, R., Golder, S., Hawton, K., & Sowden, A.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
McDaid, Catriona
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2008-12
Volume
193
Issue
6
Pages
438-443
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1966368779
Cited by
107
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
suicide bereavement, bereavement interventions, grief after suicide, family intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, mental health support
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Child, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Suicide, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review